On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
The code is in the repo... I will start to work on it tomorrow again..
Contact me via mail (or google talk same address)
if you need further assistance!
I'd still prefer that the discussion is done via this *public*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12689824#action_12689824
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1258:
--
+ServletRequest req
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
New documentation for myfaces-builder-plugin is available at
Stephen, wrote an awesome article:
http://www.jroller.com/scolebourne/entry/no_more_java_7
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Hi,
what do people think about this guy:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1434
A *possible* fix could be, to simple move this if:
snip
// If the encoding is already right, we can bail
if (encoding.equals(_encoding))
return;
/snip
a little bit up, and only do the WARNING when the
Werner Punz schrieb:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
The code is in the repo... I will start to work on it tomorrow again..
Contact me via mail (or google talk same address)
if you need further assistance!
I'd still
eh,yeah,sure.
private things don't belong here.
all dev-related things do...
-M
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Werner Punz schrieb:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
The code
Hello ok I should have consulted the spec, but we have a compile target
of java 6 in our myfaces 2.0 builds. I am not sure if jsf2.0 really opts
for java 6?
I assumed it is really java 5 still or am I wrong?
Cheers
Werner
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
The code is in the repo... I will start to work on it tomorrow again..
Contact me via mail (or google talk same address)
if you need further assistance!
I'd still prefer that the discussion
Well I can live with it although I dont see too much reason to target
java6 codewise, since we do not use too many new features of it extensively
(In january it was just one data structure which replaced the old Stack
data structure that was it).
I think we should target java5 still in our
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I can live with it although I dont see too much reason to target java6
codewise, since we do not use too many new features of it extensively
(In january it was just one data structure
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well I can live with it although I dont see too much reason to target
java6
codewise, since we do not use too
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I can live with it although I dont see too much reason to target java6
codewise, since we do not use too many new features of it extensively
(In january it was just one data structure which replaced the old Stack
Hey Werner,
I am not entire sure, but I'd guess that it is Java6, because scope is Java EE 6
and that is also somewhat depending on JAva 6, AFAIK.
-Matthias
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello ok I should have consulted the spec, but we have a
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well I can live with it although
good news, werner :-)
http://markmail.org/message/ir6p5hu35vjznatv
-M
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Werner Punz
Hi,
Actually the original release was intended to be in sync with JEE 6, so Java
6 was ok and used (I do use Deque). However, it was announced recently that
2.0 will be out before JEE 6 and a maintenance release of JSF (hopefully
2.1) will be bundled with JEE 6. Therefore, I guess your point is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12689908#action_12689908
]
Christian Beutenmueller commented on TRINIDAD-1357:
---
I just ran into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12689911#action_12689911
]
Christian Beutenmueller commented on TRINIDAD-1357:
---
I forgot versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Beutenmueller updated TRINIDAD-1357:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
RowKeySetTreeImpl.iterator()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-1401.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT
Promote sandbox toggleLink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-1405.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT
PanelTab style and
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 3/27/2009 12:11 AM PT:
Hi,
what do people think about this guy:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1434
A *possible* fix could be, to simple move this if:
snip
// If the encoding is already right, we can bail
if (encoding.equals(_encoding))
Blocking during PPR for IE on return from dialog
Key: TRINIDAD-1439
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1439
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Hi Werner,
I've been reading the current MyFaces 2.0 AJAX code. I want to try and
share my concerns on 4 subjects:
1. The collecting of form parameters will need some refinement:
getFormMap doesn't care for upper/lower case of tagname and type though
differ per browser and between HTML/XHTML.
Hi everyone,
I want to propose some new public apis for Trinidad.
*Overview*
We need a public API to get the CSS style properties (e.g., color: red)
on the server in our renderers. We work around the lack of apis by
using skinning custom style properties instead (e.g., -tr-color: red)
adding TRINIDAD to the subject.
Jeanne Waldman wrote, On 3/27/2009 4:36 PM PT:
Hi
everyone,
I want to propose some new public apis for Trinidad.
*Overview*
We need a public API to get the CSS style properties (e.g., color: red)
on the server in our renderers. We work around the lack of
27 matches
Mail list logo
