Re: Incompatibility of Tomahawk + JSF 2

Hello Thank you very much for your reply. I am not sure how I should build. It has many modules. How can I get the tomahawk.jar file? I tried to use maven and I get the following error The following mojo encountered an error while executing: Group-Id: org.apache.myfaces.buildtools Artifact-Id:

Re: Incompatibility of Tomahawk + JSF 2

Hi Try build the latest code here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/ First you may need to build some of these projects: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/test/trunk/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/trunk/maven2-plugins/myfaces-builder-plu

Incompatibility of Tomahawk + JSF 2

Hello All I have built a datatable based on Tomahawk 1.1.9 & JSF 1.2 for my current project. Recently, we decided to upgrade our JSF implementation from 1.2 to 2. Now, if the upgrade happens, the datatable (based on tomahawk 1.1.9) is not going to work anymore. However, I am in desperate need of

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TRINIDAD-1893) trh:tablelayout not a layout table in screen reader mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902656#action_12902656 ] Dave Robinson edited comment on TRINIDAD-1893 at 8/25/10 5:58 PM:

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-1893) trh:tablelayout not a layout table in screen reader mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Robinson updated TRINIDAD-1893: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > trh:tablelayout not a layout table in screen read

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1893) trh:tablelayout not a layout table in screen reader mode

trh:tablelayout not a layout table in screen reader mode Key: TRINIDAD-1893 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1893 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug

Re: hud...@myfaces

pretty cool stuff. Interesting option on the Apache configuration: We could also use Harmony to build our stuff :-) -Matthias On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Gerhard wrote: > hi grant, > it's great that you looked for the myfaces view. > for the others: > i created it to group all our build-job

Re: hud...@myfaces

hi grant, it's great that you looked for the myfaces view. for the others: i created it to group all our build-jobs - see [1]. regards, gerhard [1] https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/MyFaces/ http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and G

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2889) [PERF] Remove String.intern() calls in FlashELResolver and ImplicitObjectResolver

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902582#action_12902582 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-2889: I am not commenting on whether i

Re: EL method invocation performance

Hi, I'll try it but not today :) Optimization is my priority task for next few months and certainly I'll compare all four (or more?) EL implementations. Mark Struberg píše v St 25. 08. 2010 v 17:52 +: > Martin, could you please give juel a quick try? Would be interested if if > also > suff

Re: EL method invocation performance

great, I think Glassfish, Tomcat and JBoss do appreciate a bug report :-) -Matthias On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Martin Koci wrote: > Now I'm sure that it is an implementation problem: it was very > suspicious that both Tomcat and Glassfish implementations have it - but > Geronimo does not

Re: EL method invocation performance

Now I'm sure that it is an implementation problem: it was very suspicious that both Tomcat and Glassfish implementations have it - but Geronimo does not have this problem. Andy Schwartz píše v St 25. 08. 2010 v 11:38 -0400: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jakob Korherr > wrote: > > > If it

Re: EL method invocation performance

Great! I thought that tomcat and geronimo EL implementation are from same source; But just now I'm looking in geronimo code and expressionFactory instance is cached - I'll definitely try it, thanks! Ivan píše v St 25. 08. 2010 v 22:54 +0800: > How about trying the el api published by Geronimo ? i

Re: EL method invocation performance

Martin, could you please give juel a quick try? Would be interested if if also suffers from this problem. You can find a slightly tweaked (bugfixed) version of it on my github page http://github.com/struberg/juel The original is on juel.sourceforge.net LieGrue, strub > >From: Jakob Korherr

Re: hud...@myfaces

OK, I have added a whole lot of builds. Currently testing them. All under the Myfaces view. Next I need to figure out how to copy the artifacts to the nightly builds area... On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Gerhard wrote: > thx, > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerho

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-2893) Update qdox to 1.12 on myfaces-builder-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2893. Fix Version/s: 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Update qdox to 1.12 on myfaces-b

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-2893) Update qdox to 1.12 on myfaces-builder-plugin

Update qdox to 1.12 on myfaces-builder-plugin - Key: MYFACES-2893 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2893 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Task Components: build process

Re: EL method invocation performance

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jakob Korherr wrote: > If it is an implementation problem and can be circumvent in any way, I would > contact the Glassfish and Tomcat developers about this ;) +1. I pinged Kin-man as a heads up on this... Andy

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1892) Support source template for JSP tag generation

Support source template for JSP tag generation -- Key: TRINIDAD-1892 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1892 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Improvement Components:

Re: EL method invocation performance

Hi, Does this really have to happen at every method invocation or is this an implementation problem? If it is an implementation problem and can be circumvent in any way, I would contact the Glassfish and Tomcat developers about this ;) Regards, Jakob 2010/8/25 Ivan > How about trying the el a

Re: EL method invocation performance

How about trying the el api published by Geronimo ? it caches the ExpressionFactory to avoid the search action by default. 2010/8/25 Martin Koci > Hi, > > this problem is not in myfaces but affects performance especially in > render response phase: > > EL 2.2 introduces method invocation but if

EL method invocation performance

Hi, this problem is not in myfaces but affects performance especially in render response phase: EL 2.2 introduces method invocation but if you try use it like rendered="#{bean.getRendered(param)}" there is an unpleasant surprise: both implementations of BeanELResolver (Glassfish, Tomcat) use thi

Re: hud...@myfaces

thx, regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/8/25 Matthias Wessendorf > Also, I added: > -Leo > -Werner > -Gerhard > > -Matthias > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:27 AM

Re: hud...@myfaces

Hi Thanks Matthias ;-) best regards, Leonardo 2010/8/25 Matthias Wessendorf > Also, I added: > -Leo > -Werner > -Gerhard > > -Matthias > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > > done > > > > -M > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Scott O'Bryan > wrote: > >> H

Re: hud...@myfaces

Also, I added: -Leo -Werner -Gerhard -Matthias On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > done > > -M > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: >> Hey Matthias, can you add me to this?  I'd be willing to try the >> bridge stuff.  Continuum has proven fairly un

Setup email notifications from hudson for myfaces

Hello we should ensure that hudson can send emails notification to dev@myfaces.apache.org, comm...@myfaces.apache.org and notificati...@myfaces.apache.org. see http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_allow_Hudson_to_mail_to_my_project.27s_.22dev.22_list.3F Can the list moderator take a l

[Trinidad] Nested grid not showing details

Hello, At this moment I am trying to get a nested grid working. The 'detailStamp' column is shown, but when a expand button is clicked, the table is not expanded. I created a small test project in Netbeans 6.9, using Trinidad 2 Alpha. The table is not created in the xhtml page, but programmatic

Re: hud...@myfaces

done -M On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > Hey Matthias, can you add me to this?  I'd be willing to try the > bridge stuff.  Continuum has proven fairly unreliable for us. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> Thanks Bernd!

Re: hud...@myfaces

Hey Matthias, can you add me to this? I'd be willing to try the bridge stuff. Continuum has proven fairly unreliable for us. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 25, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Thanks Bernd! > > Right now the following committers have been added: > -Bernd Bohmann > -

Re: hud...@myfaces

Thanks Bernd! Right now the following committers have been added: -Bernd Bohmann -Grant Smith -Matthias Wessendorf -M On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Bernd Bohmann wrote: > Hello > > for trying hudson instead of continuum you need a hudson account. > > You can ask matthias for adding you to th