I had another question regarding the "CHECK_STATE_SERIALIZATION"
parameter (check dev@)
patch for the other items is attached to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1652
Also, check:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1661
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-166
I will ignore the temporary
"org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_PPR_OPTIMIZATION"
parameter, until we know more.
See here:
http://markmail.org/message/dqgeqwkzdwjkrhgm
-Matthias
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_goes_Pro
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Simon Lessard
wrote:
> Looks good to me as well. I've got to admit that this ProjectStage thing
> seems to get more useful than what I was thinking when I first saw it pop on
> the EG list
+1 same here :-) I love the feature now :-)
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:
Looks good to me as well. I've got to admit that this ProjectStage thing
seems to get more useful than what I was thinking when I first saw it pop on
the EG list
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> awesome.
>
> I plan to start development on that next week... Till than y
awesome.
I plan to start development on that next week... Till than you can
change your mind :-)
-Matthias
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Jeanne Waldman
wrote:
> I agree with your list Matthias.
> Jeanne
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 12/8/2009 8:56 AM PT:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/myface
I agree with your list Matthias.
Jeanne
Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 12/8/2009 8:56 AM PT:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_goes_ProjectStage
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
ok,
I updated the wiki:
I will continue with these values, as there
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_goes_ProjectStage
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> ok,
>
> I updated the wiki:
>
> I will continue with these values, as there was no concern against them.
>
> regarding the hidden, unspecified
> "javax.faces.FACELETS_REFRESH_PER
ok,
I updated the wiki:
I will continue with these values, as there was no concern against them.
regarding the hidden, unspecified
"javax.faces.FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD" parameter, I will follow up in
a different thread.
-Matthias
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam
wrote:
> "Matthias Wessendorf wrote:" On 12/2/2009 10:43 AM PT:
>
> Ok,
>
> I added some value suggestions to those guys that we identified to fit
> into the ProjectStage API:
>
>
> -org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DEBUG_JAVASCRIPT
> * Production =>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Martin Koci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my question was not clear probably, so I try to reformulate it:
>
> - Trindad has param CHECK_FILE_MODIFICATION
> - JSF 2.0 has param FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD
> - javax.faces.ProjectStage is a general parameter at higher level of
> abstr
"Matthias Wessendorf wrote:" On 12/2/2009 10:43 AM PT:
Ok,
I added some value suggestions to those guys that we identified to fit
into the ProjectStage API:
-org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DEBUG_JAVASCRIPT
* Production => FALSE
* other stages => TRUE
+1. although I think if a user were to ch
Hi,
my question was not clear probably, so I try to reformulate it:
- Trindad has param CHECK_FILE_MODIFICATION
- JSF 2.0 has param FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD
- javax.faces.ProjectStage is a general parameter at higher level of
abstraction than previous two
- FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD vs. ProjectSta
Ok,
I added some value suggestions to those guys that we identified to fit
into the ProjectStage API:
-org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DEBUG_JAVASCRIPT
* Production => FALSE
* other stages => TRUE
-org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION
* Production => FALSE
* other stages => TR
yep, that's what I was saying
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jakob Korherr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the best way would be that the init parameters have stage related
> standard values (actually that what Matthias suggested), for example:
>
> If we are in ProjectStage.Production the standard valu
Hi,
I think the best way would be that the init parameters have stage related
standard values (actually that what Matthias suggested), for example:
If we are in ProjectStage.Production the standard value of
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION is false, otherwise
it is true.
B
Hi,
does trinidad reload both JSP and facelets views if
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CHECK_FILE_MODIFICATION=true?
For facelets based views there is a new JSF 2.0 param
javax.faces.FACELETS_REFRESH_PERIOD (-1 = never reload, 0=always, 1,2,
3,.. - check interval) but it's relation to project stage
Hi,
I created a quick wiki page for to cover our "research":
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_goes_ProjectStage
-Matthias
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do agree. The list looks fine to me, and yes, we should allow the users to
> override parameters whe
Hi,
I do agree. The list looks fine to me, and yes, we should allow the users to
override parameters when they wish so in the web.xml.
Cheers,
Bruno
2009/12/2 Matthias Wessendorf
> Hi,
>
> here is a (complete?) list of all Trinidad configuration parameters:
>
> * System Properties ( => System
Hi,
here is a (complete?) list of all Trinidad configuration parameters:
* System Properties ( => System.getProperty()):
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CHECK_STATE_SERIALIZATION
documentation is here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1245
http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-
19 matches
Mail list logo