Re: [commons] How to name the artifacts and version numbering? (question required to release commons!)

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, +1 for number 2 also. i expect a 1.2 version of a lib as a compatible improvement of a 1.1 version and even maven does this when building.

Re: [commons] How to name the artifacts and version numbering? (question required to release commons!)

Hi, +1 for number 2 also. i expect a 1.2 version of a lib as a compatible improvement of a 1.1 version and even maven does this when building. Regards, Volker 2008/9/5 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi On a previous discussion (please see):

Re: [commons] How to name the artifacts and version numbering? (question required to release commons!)

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, +1 for number 2 also. i expect a 1.2 version of a lib as a compatible improvement of a 1.1 version and even maven does this when building. If no objections I'll change the artifact names and version for release

[commons] How to name the artifacts and version numbering? (question required to release commons!)

Hi On a previous discussion (please see): http://www.nabble.com/-myfaces-commons--discussion-about-reorganization-of-this-project-is-required!-td17692039.htmlhttp://www.nabble.com/-myfaces-commons--discussion-about-reorganization-of-this-project-is-required%21-td17692039.html It was proposed to