[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-525?page=comments#action_12322757 
] 

Bruno Aranda commented on MYFACES-525:
--------------------------------------

> I think that 'hibernate'... 
I wanted to say 'myfaces' instead. A co-worker was asking me a question about 
hibernate when I was writing this.... :-)

> Myfaces does not handle correctly the from-view-id's with wildcards
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MYFACES-525
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-525
>      Project: MyFaces
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: JSR-127
>     Versions: 1.0.9m9
>     Reporter: Bruno Aranda

>
> From the spec (section 7.4.2, p5-10/11), when talking about the 
> NavigationHandler:
> << Rule instances are
> considered in the following order:
> - An exact match of the view identifier against a <from-view-id> pattern that
> does not end with an asterisk ("*") character.
> - For <from-view-id> patterns that end with an asterisk, an exact match on
> characters preceding the asterisk against the prefix of the view id. If the
> patterns for multiple navigation rules match, pick the longest matching prefix
> first.
> - If there is a <navigation-rule> with a <from-view-id> pattern of only an
> asterisk, it matches any view identifier.>>
> In myfaces something happens with the from-view-id's with asterisk. Lets 
> illustrate a case:
> 1. <from-view-id>test3</from-view-id>
> 2. <from-view-id>test*</from-view-id>
> 3. <from-view-id>*</from-view-id>
> I think that hibernate does not understand correctly the <from-view-id>'s 
> with asterisk. For instance, if I am in the a view with id 'tes' (sic), the 
> from-view-id used is the #2 when it should be the number #3.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to