Not a bad idea. We'll need to be careful to not break the release build (which can't have any sandbox stuff in it.) Just make sure everything builds fine with or without sandbox.
At some point we should also change the examples to use 'sbx' instead of 's' or 'x' (like we discussed earlier.) Also I noticed the Tobago stuff uses 't' which might get confusing ... sean On 9/6/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no problem for me. > > except that we will not have much drive towards moving components from > sandbox to tomahawk then, but that's something we should be able to cope > with, I'd say. > > regards, > > Martin > > > > On 9/6/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As we have a myfaces-all.jar, it would be nice to also add a corresponding > > tld with <uri>http://myfaces.apache.org/all< /uri> to this jar. > > This tld would roughly concatenate the ones from tomahawk & from sandbox. > > > > That way, we could recycle the old x: prefix, and avoid changing the > > applications when a component moves from the sandbox to tomahawk. > > > > I think it would be very convenient for those using sandbox's components > > in their applications (at least, it would be very convenient for me ). > > > > Any thoughts ? > > > > Sylvain. > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Trainings in English and German
