Hey Catalin,
not a big deal. Honestly the licensing question is a not trivial drama :-)
-M
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Catalin Kormos
wrote:
> Hey Matthias,
>
> All clear, thanks a lot for the clarifications, I might have went a
> bit too fast over the compatibility of licenses when I chec
Hey Matthias,
All clear, thanks a lot for the clarifications, I might have went a
bit too fast over the compatibility of licenses when I checked it out.
regards,
Catalin
On 1/28/10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hey Catalin,
>
>
> CDDL may/can work:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
>
Hey Catalin,
CDDL may/can work:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
GPL3 is NOT compatible. However, projects that are licensed under GPL3
can actually now include Apache2 licensed software;
That is the reason why *they* state GPL3 is compatible.
See here, no the "no-go" section.
http://www
Hi Bernd,
Ok, the problematic code will be removed asap. There is still an
alternate approach there, which was used first, formatting source code
with https://jhighlight.dev.java.net/. This can easily replace the JS
based formatting. Do you see any issues with using jhighlight? we
don't distribute
Hi catalin,
The apache license and the gnu public license are not compatible from the
asf side. It would be safe to remove the gpl code.
Regards
Bernd
28.01.2010 13:52 schrieb am "Catalin Kormos" :
Hi Matthias,
This JS library "SyntaxHighlighter" is used to format code, and its
license is GN