Hello,
what is the alternative?
How is this handled by the RI?
What is the performance impakt?
Why not a container can separate each jsf webapp with a separate
classloader? Independent of the jsf implementation is provided by the
container or not.
Can we remove commons logging and use jdk
this was discussed near to death in the past.
search for simon kitching and logging here in the myfaces list
-M
On 2/27/07, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
what is the alternative?
How is this handled by the RI?
What is the performance impakt?
Why not a container can separa
Dennis Byrne schrieb:
> Alright. Here's my +1 binding. Let's put the nail in this coffin.
>
> Dennis Byrne
+1 for that as well, this has been a code burden for too long.
Sorry to jump in here again,
I have been playing guinea pig the last
week for marios work.
All I can say is this thing now is highly usable
by now.
You can put a view controller under conversation scope
(not a shale one yet, you will lose the callbacks)
and simply work on the stuff now like you wou
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> @troubles: just like you should never put component-bindings in
> session-scope.
>
@Solved in fusion...
how can I see the result of this work?
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to jump in here again,
I have been playing guinea pig the last
week for marios work.
All I can say is this thing now is highly usable
by now.
You can put a view controller under conversation scope
(n
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> how can I see the result of this work?
>
The demos are not quite there yet (mario is working on them)
but you can contact me this evening so that I can drop
some example code.
;-)
Ok here is a first small bite:
What we have here is a simple detail conversation
the master gets injected so that we can have work done
after update
but lives in its own conversation
what happens the user id is injected so is the master
(design decision i chose, you probably could get
the affecte
Additon,
so that you can see that there is nothing hidden in the dao and bo
layers which hides complexity:
dao:
public User createUpdateUser(User user) {
if(!getEm().contains(user) && user.getId() == null)
getEm().persist(user);
//we flush here because t
Not much happened yet...
See just added page http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TomahawkRelease115.
--Manfred
On 2/26/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Their was a flurry of mailing list traffic last week around the 1.1.5
release of Tomahawk. I do not see a release plan for this release o
+1
--Manfred
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Byrne schrieb:
> Alright. Here's my +1 binding. Let's put the nail in this coffin.
>
> Dennis Byrne
+1 for that as well, this has been a code burden for too long.
Hi Matthias!
> this was discussed near to death in the past.
> search for simon kitching and logging here in the myfaces list
Anyway, just that we really know what we are talking about:
We have to remove the "static" keyword from the logger
and add a method getLog() which will lazily get the logge
inputSugestAjax onchange JavaScript error
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-910
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-910
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: InputSuggestAjax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476126
]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-305:
-
Please remove the escape="false", than it works.
with escape=false the "ü"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Schuster updated TOMAHAWK-910:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> inputSugestAjax onchange JavaScript error
>
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
> And - some prerequisites have changed - how many sense does it make when
> all new jee container forbid to have a custom jsf jar in your webapp-lib?
> Then the gc problem should no longer exist as this library will not be
> reloaded then, no?
>
I think it still makes s
The account (mrmaven) is still locked...
I'm not a member of the private list. Any chance to get me in?
2007/2/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello continuum admins,
>
> the http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8081 "mrmaven" account
Hi Arash!
> how can I see the result of this work?
I don't know if Werner is able to put his work into public, though, I am
working on an example showing the same patterns.
It took some time to setup the examples framework, though, yesterday I
managed to bring it up and can start now to implement
Hello Nikolaos,
you mentioned a couple of days ago that you will post some code. Can you please
post it? I am having
the same problem, and even though I tried the solution mentioned by Robert (the
one with binding the
dataScroller to a null field) it didn't worked for me.
So maybe you solution
Hi!
Ok, I'll start the naming question now.
My personal favorit for the new library still is "MyFaces Fusion", for
what I have seen on the Internet and the "United States Patent and
Trademark Office" there is already a oracle product called "Oracle
Fusion", though, they trademarked the whole phra
Theres a page about this on the logging wiki here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/StaticLog
Niall
On 2/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this was discussed near to death in the past.
search for simon kitching and logging here in the myfaces list
-M
On 2/2
So from MY legal point of view "MyFaces Fusion" is safe as long as we
assure that the official name of the library contains the name MyFaces too.
quick note, that is should be "Apache MyFaces Fusion" instead of
"just" MyFaces Fusion
What do you think?
Ciao,
Mario
--
Matthias Wessendorf
+1 for removing the static.
What is about java.util.logging? Can/Should we use it for 1.2?
IMO it is better to use java.util.logging. Apart from the unusable
default implementation for java.util.logging the reason not to use it
in myfaces 1.1 was the dependency to java 1.4. But jsf 1.2 will only
I personally like fusion
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> Ok, I'll start the naming question now.
>
> My personal favorit for the new library still is "MyFaces Fusion", for
> what I have seen on the Internet and the "United States Patent and
> Trademark Office" there is already a oracle prod
good point if you can hook commons.logging (I know this is somewhat
insane because commons is just a meta logger)
below it, I do not know the core java logging api good enough
but every dependency we can remove is a + from me.
Problem is if we cannot provide a path to hook commons logging into
it
Hi Matthias!
>> So from MY legal point of view "MyFaces Fusion" is safe as long as we
>> assure that the official name of the library contains the name
>> MyFaces too.
>
> quick note, that is should be "Apache MyFaces Fusion" instead of
> "just" MyFaces Fusion
Right, thanks for the pointer!
Ciao,
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
> Hi Matthias!
>>> So from MY legal point of view "MyFaces Fusion" is safe as long as we
>>> assure that the official name of the library contains the name
>>> MyFaces too.
>> quick note, that is should be "Apache MyFaces Fusion" instead of
>> "just" MyFaces Fusion
>
> Ri
Apache MyFaces Sesams ? :-)
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
> Hi Matthias!
>>> So from MY legal point of view "MyFaces Fusion" is safe as long as we
>>> assure that the official name of the library contains the name
>>> MyFaces too.
>> quick note, tha
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
> Apache MyFaces Sesams ? :-)
>
Apache Vista :-D
Werner Punz schrieb:
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>> Apache MyFaces Sesams ? :-)
>>
> Apache Vista :-D
>
>
Now a serious one
Apache MyFaces Salida
> Now a serious one
> Apache MyFaces Salida
>
I like the spanish style - one more: Apache MyFaces Defender
In Spanish its something like to hold/to know etc
Even in English we can argue we "defend" against detached objects ;-)
Ciao,
Mario
Now a serious one
Apache MyFaces Salida
I like that one
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
On 2/27/07, Mathias Brökelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The account (mrmaven) is still locked...
I'm not a member of the private list. Any chance to get me in?
Done.
--
Wendy
Thanks, Wendy!
2007/2/27, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2/27/07, Mathias Brökelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The account (mrmaven) is still locked...
>
> I'm not a member of the private list. Any chance to get me in?
Done.
--
Wendy
--
Mathias
Werner,
Why not add this an example app to the fusion project?
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> how can I see the result of this work?
>
The demos are not quite there yet (mario is working on them)
but you can contact me this evening so that I can d
On 2/27/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just as a procedural note, the only votes that PMC members have
binding votes on is releases. For technical issues (like this one),
all committer votes are not only binding, but a -1 (supported by
adequate reasoning) is a blocker (whereas a
Manfred,
Are you the release manager on this one? If not, who is?
What is the projected timetable for the release?
Paul Spencer
Manfred Geiler wrote:
Not much happened yet...
See just added page http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TomahawkRelease115.
--Manfred
On 2/26/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PR
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
> Werner,
>
> Why not add this an example app to the fusion project?
>
>
Problem is i do not know the code rights of the current code I do.
I have to clear that up first.
But what I am currently doing is following.
I code my app which is a bigger than the usual exampl
UISelectOne validation fails with custom converter
--
Key: MYFACES-1545
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1545
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.5
Ah, Ok.
I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
not trying to use it for real work :-)
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
> Werner,
>
> Why not add this an example app to the fusion project?
>
>
Problem is i do not know th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476201
]
Dennis Hauser commented on TOBAGO-302:
--
I added some logging to tobago.js and tobago-sheet.js that might lead to
thank a lot mario, I have started to give it a try.
hope I can learn it fast and write about it soon.
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Arash!
> how can I see the result of this work?
I don't know if Werner is able to put his work into public, though, I am
working on a
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
> Ah, Ok.
>
> I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
> not trying to use it for real work :-)
>
Actually no it is a production project, it was kindof risky, the
schedule for the project
is very tight, I opted for fusion because it saves me a
Hello,
I was thrilled to find the excelExport component, as I have a business need
to export a datatable to excel. And on the whole, it works great! Thank
you!
However, I have found two areas where the behavior is unexpected, perhaps
bugs?
1) If the dataTable has sortable=true, then none of t
+1 for removing static, +1 for using java.util.logging. I'm also somewhat
against using commons logging; what real benefit would it afford us ?
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
good point if you can hook commons.logging (I know this is somewhat
insane because commons is just a
Hi Tara,
Could you please file a jira issue for the points you mentioned and link it
to the nabble link below;
http://www.nabble.com/ExcelExport-column-headers-in-Excel-file-tf3302286.html#a9185916
Also next time we'd appreciate if you post these kind of stuff to the users
mail instead.
Thanks
This is a very precise explanation.
Thank you Mike!
--Manfred
On 2/27/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/27/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just as a procedural note, the only votes that PMC members have
> binding votes on is releases. For technical issues
+ 1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
- 2 : Apache MyFaces Defender (awful!)
+0 : Apache MyFaces Salida (e...)
--
Grant Smith
Allow valueReference in basename of tc:loadBundle like f:loadBundle
---
Key: TOBAGO-306
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-306
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type:
+1 for removing static logging.
-1 for java.util.logging. I like the freedom that commons logging
provides. In my case, I use log4j to email log entries that meet a
specific criteria while others are written to a rotating log. Their may
be way to do this using java.util.logging, I am pretty
-0.9 for removing commons-logging from jsf1.2 branch (now)
Explanation:
In the near future we will have to manage two "branches" that
originate from the same source: jsf 1.1.x and 1.2.x. Making massive
changes to the jsf1.2 codebase that are NOT alone based on jsf 1.1 and
1.2 spec differences are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-306.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Allow valueReference in basename of tc:loadBundle like f:loadBundle
> -
> I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
> not trying to use it for real work :-)
He is really enthusiastic and an adventurer ;-)
Kudos to Werner!
Ciao,
Mario
Are you the release manager on this one? If not, who is?
Not set in stone, of course.
Any other volunteer stepping forward? Welcome!
:-)
What is the projected timetable for the release?
The timetable is:
ASAP - depending on my spare time during the next days provided that
I'm the release m
There's no way that "Fusion" as a web development framework is going
to pass legal. It doesn't matter if you call it Fusion, MyFaces
Fusion, or Apache Myfaces Fusion. Even if it could (and it can't),
why would you want to develop product that would be confused with any
of the other "fusion" we
+1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
-0.9 : Apache MyFaces Salida
-1 : Apache MyFaces Defender
-1 : Apache MyFaces Sesams
On 2/27/07, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ 1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
- 2 : Apache MyFaces Defender (awful!)
+0 : Apache MyFaces Salida (e...)
--
Grant Smith
Ok, after reading Mikes mail and looking at these sites
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/
http://www.netobjects.com/index.html
I must revert my previous vote:
-1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
-1 : Apache MyFaces Defender
-0.9 : Apache MyFaces Salida
-0.9 : Apache MyFaces Sesams
What about "Ap
On 2/27/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, after reading Mikes mail and looking at these sites
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/
http://www.netobjects.com/index.html
I must revert my previous vote:
there is also a Fusion from Oracle.
-1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
-1 : A
hello *,
there are two "Apache Trinidad API" projects on
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8080
I can't remove them... I am getting errors... any idea. or are we
going to "remove" the old continuum soon ?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.co
Hi Manfred!
> What about "Apache MyFaces Seamless" ?!
I don't think its a good idea to use anything which sounds like Seam.
Seam aims to be much more than I have in mind for Fusion now.
See, they integrated stuff to create PDFs lately.
I don't wont to suggest - by using nearly the same name - that
What about "Apache MyFaces Seamless" ?!
+1
--Manfred
On 2/27/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1: Apache MyFaces Fusion
> -0.9 : Apache MyFaces Salida
> -1 : Apache MyFaces Defender
> -1 : Apache MyFaces Sesams
>
>
> On 2/27/07, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476362
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-548:
One possiblity -- an actionlistener component:
> Abilit
Ok here are my serious suggestions:
* Apache MyFaces Mergence
* Apache MyFaces Accretion
* Apache MyFaces Collective
I have neither checked for legal issues nor do I know how these names
sound for native speakers. But I like project names that are not only
names but also describe the idea.
--Ma
What about something completely different:
Apache MyFaces Aurora
Positive thing, no? Seriously.
Ciao,
Mario
Apache Faces Concerto anyone?
Zubin.
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about something completely different:
Apache MyFaces Aurora
Positive thing, no? Seriously.
Ciao,
Mario
Apache MyFaces Orchestra?
--Manfred
On 2/27/07, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache Faces Concerto anyone?
Zubin.
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about something completely different:
>
> Apache MyFaces Aurora
>
> Positive thing, no? Seriously.
>
>
>
guys,
let's collect these names in a jira task.
eclipse did that in the past for one for their naming issues and the
Trinidad podling did it as well.
Also this will give users a change to put in their ideas as well
-M
On 2/27/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache MyFaces Orches
I'd suggest "Maestro" since it focuses on different aspects like orm, view
and etc.
My other suggestion will be Lamborghini but unfortunately it's taken by a
company some time ago:)
Cheers,
Cagatay
On 2/27/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache MyFaces Orchestra?
--Manfred
O
well...
these aren't that easy to use...
please consider registered names as a no
:-)
On 2/27/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd suggest "Maestro" since it focuses on different aspects like orm, view
and etc.
My other suggestion will be Lamborghini but unfortunately it's taken b
Find a new name for Apache MyFaces Fusion
-
Key: MYFACES-1546
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1546
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Task
Components: General
Re
Create a tc:selectItems tag
---
Key: TOBAGO-307
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-307
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core
Reporter: Bernd Bohmann
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476388
]
Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1546:
---
some more
MyFaces ease
MyFaces Snug
MyFaces Rush
> Find a
It's up to you, but I'd think using a wiki page would be far easier to manage.
You can propose names, and then group them as they're added:
- current contenders
- names eliminated because
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
> let's collect these names in a jira t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-307.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Create a tc:selectItems tag
> ---
>
>
Dennis Byrne schrieb:
>
> What about "Apache MyFaces Seamless" ?!
>
>
> +1
>
Definite -1 on that, I do not want to get into a fight with the jboss
guys over such a name
mario is right, even if we cover certain common grounds, seam has an
entirely different scope. After all we have a somewha
nice demo, dose any documentation exist any where to start? (other than this
example)
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Arash!
> how can I see the result of this work?
I don't know if Werner is able to put his work into public, though, I am
working on an example showin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476407
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-302:
--
I can't reproduce the problem on my windows IE.
But can you try this, p
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
>> I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
>> not trying to use it for real work :-)
> He is really enthusiastic and an adventurer ;-)
>
It has less to do with adventure more along the lines of having been on
a dreadful schedule for the ap
Hi Arash!
> nice demo,
hehe, dont lie ;-)
> dose any documentation exist any where to start? (other than this example)
Unfortunately no, not yet. But I'll start one soon.
Ciao,
Mario
Mike,
> It's up to you, but I'd think using a wiki page would be far easier to
> manage.
> You can propose names, and then group them as they're added:
I thought that too, and I'll do so tomorrow, for now letz use the jira
just to collect the names without any bias.
I'll close the jira (maybe tom
This was definitely no serious suggestion. Of course. Therefore the smiley.
Sorry if I did not state this clear enough.
Of course we all have no interest in any (malicious) allusion [is
"innuendo" a better word?].
Although perhaps every open source community should have enough humor
to bear such
I propose "Chasb"
Chasb means Glue in my native language, we can use other translations of
glue like
colle
colla
Kleber
lijm
κόλλα
клей
colagem
pegamento
On 2/28/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike,
> It's up to you, but I'd think using a wiki page would be far easier to
> ma
+1 for
"Apache MyFaces Kleber"
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose "Chasb"
Chasb means Glue in my native language, we can use other translations of
glue like
colle
colla
Kleber
lijm
κόλλα
клей
colagem
pegamento
On 2/28/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Hey,
> let's collect these names in a jira task.
here we go:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1546
Ciao,
Mario
just give me some hints if possible
I have two more days to finish this part of the book I am writing and I am
interested to replace the seam framework I used in my example with fusion
(or what ever it will be called in future)
I have used only seam for integration with JPA, and it looks like I ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476389
]
Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1546:
---
Including Apache on the above for sure
> Find a new name fo
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
>> I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
>> not trying to use it for real work :-)
> He is really enthusiastic and an adventurer ;-)
>
It has less to do with adventure more along the li
another Idea using name of foods people cook and eat when they are in hurry,
I eat fish tuna or omelet when I don't have time too cook!
may be the name brings similar idea in mind to developers.
Tuna,
Grill,
Omelette or (omelet),
Sandwich,
Snack,
Chips,
Sausage,
...
Add Apache MyFaces to the be
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
>
> Except that you might have been able to save some work by leveraging
> one of the existing dialog manager solutions (including possibly
> negotiating feature additions if you needed something that wasn't
> already supported). Instead, you guys just created another o
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> just give me some hints if possible
> I have two more days to finish this part of the book I am writing and I
> am interested to replace the seam framework I used in my example with
> fusion (or what ever it will be called in future)
> I have used only seam for integratio
I am more interested in ORM control part.
I prefer to stay neutral between seam and shale in the book :)
On 2/28/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> just give me some hints if possible
> I have two more days to finish this part of the book I am writing and I
>
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> I am more interested in ORM control part.
> I prefer to stay neutral between seam and shale in the book :)
>
Ok what info do you need exactly?
Hi Arash!
> just give me some hints if possible
> I have two more days to finish this part of the book I am writing and
> I am interested to replace the seam framework I used in my example
> with fusion (or what ever it will be called in future)
> I have used only seam for integration with JPA, and
ExcelExport doesn't populate column headers in Excel file
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-911
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-911
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Aff
Thank you for the reply. I have submitted it to JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-911
Sorry for posting to the wrong list.
--Tara
Cagatay Civici wrote:
>
> Hi Tara,
>
> Could you please file a jira issue for the points you mentioned and link
> it
> to the nabble link bel
Thanks mario, (and Werner)
thats this is more than enough!
On 2/28/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Arash!
> just give me some hints if possible
> I have two more days to finish this part of the book I am writing and
> I am interested to replace the seam framework I used in my
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am more interested in ORM control part.
I prefer to stay neutral between seam and shale in the book :)
Don't forget about the conversation scope implementation in Trinidad, too :-).
Craig
oh yes, also conversation scope of Trinidad
does you (or any one one else) have access to JSR 299 info?
do you which approach are they going to standardize for
conversation/dialog/(or what ever they name it)?
On 2/28/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan <[
Aaresh feel free to contact me via gtalk if you need help.
I am pretty far along in my app already, I have covered most usecases
you run into a typical app.
Werner
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
> Thanks mario, (and Werner)
> thats this is more than enough!
>
> On 2/28/07, *Mario Ivankovits* <[E
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh yes, also conversation scope of Trinidad
does you (or any one one else) have access to JSR 299 info?
do you which approach are they going to standardize for
conversation/dialog/(or what ever they name it)?
EG discussions on JSR-299 have
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo