Hi!
I don't think this will be controversial - I find it a rather good
basic introduction to the concepts behind JSF, actually.
I too think that this is a good introduction for any newbie. Something
you'll normally read in a book but now public for everyone.
Ciao,
Mario
regards,
Martin
our jira instance has these fields (and more...):
Fix Version/s:
Affects Version/s:
Both are editable by the bug filer.
The Affects Version/s: makes sense, since they need to identify the
broken version.
Now, I have problems in understanding the Fix Version/s field.
I understand it this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-934:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.5-core)
Hi!
Sounds good - can you send your example again utilizing the
detailStamp approach if that fits?
So, not it is getting stressy again. I have a bad need for it now.
So, using the detailStamp approach it might look like:
t:datable var=group1 value=#{bean.data}
...
t:column colspan=10
On Feb 6, 2008 12:01 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matze,
This is a (hardcoded?) Jira feature.
I don't know.
There is one special issue permission in Jira that controls who is
allowed to assign a fix version:
Resolve Issues (Ability to resolve and reopen issues. This includes
Matze,
This is a (hardcoded?) Jira feature.
There is one special issue permission in Jira that controls who is
allowed to assign a fix version:
Resolve Issues (Ability to resolve and reopen issues. This includes
the ability to set a fix version.)
Since it is necessary for the reporter to be able
Yes, and this is only possible by taking away the Resolve Issues
permission for reporters (=issue-filers) which would also forbid the
reporter to reopen an issue.
Question is: do we want this.
My feeling is: no, because: In a perfect world :-) the reporter
downloads the fix version release as soon
2008/2/6, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
but the Fix version/s should
be only for the committer, when closing.
Not only when closing. It can be used to schedule tickets. At Struts and
Tiles we use this technique very frequently: at least it is useful to
schedule on a branch or on the
On Feb 6, 2008 12:29 PM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/6, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
but the Fix version/s should
be only for the committer, when closing.
Not only when closing. It can be used to schedule tickets. At Struts and
Tiles we use this technique
On Feb 6, 2008 12:44 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, and this is only possible by taking away the Resolve Issues
permission for reporters (=issue-filers) which would also forbid the
reporter to reopen an issue.
ah...
Question is: do we want this.
no :)
My feeling is: no,
Orchestra in Portal Environment
---
Key: ORCHESTRA-15
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-15
Project: MyFaces Orchestra
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.0
Environment:
Sounds good!
regards,
Martin
On 2/6/08, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Sounds good - can you send your example again utilizing the
detailStamp approach if that fits?
So, not it is getting stressy again. I have a bad need for it now.
So, using the detailStamp approach it
panelBox is inside of panelHorizontalLayout with valign=top halign=end does
not render correctly.
-
Key: TRINIDAD-938
URL:
shortcut links in Skinning document do not work.
Key: TRINIDAD-939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-939
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566276#action_12566276
]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-939:
-
in other words, clicking on them does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566287#action_12566287
]
Mario Ivankovits commented on TOMAHAWK-1181:
Three new attribute on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Ivankovits resolved TOMAHAWK-1181.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Mario
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved TOMAHAWK-1187.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee:
hrm.
on my box it works
(sure the mentioned commit isn't related to the failure, but wondering
if someone else is seeing this too)
-M
On Feb 6, 0008 9:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Online report :
GenericConverterFactory.getInstance() should not be storing factory instance as
a static variable
-
Key: TRINIDAD-940
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Max Starets updated TRINIDAD-940:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
GenericConverterFactory.getInstance() should not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12566334#action_12566334
]
Max Starets commented on TRINIDAD-940:
--
Changes in the patch were reviewed by Blake
hello,
is someone able to provide a quick answer (see [1])?
(before i'll have a look at it.)
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-935
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional
inputHtml
-
Key: MYFACES-1813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1813
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.2
Environment: myfaces 1.2.2, tomahawk 1.1.6, facelets 1.1.13.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek deleted MYFACES-1813:
---
inputHtml
-
Key: MYFACES-1813
URL:
Not tested it:
If removing it doesn't break existing apps, I think removing is OK
-M
On Feb 6, 2008 10:16 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
is someone able to provide a quick answer (see [1])?
(before i'll have a look at it.)
regards,
gerhard
[1]
26 matches
Mail list logo