any UI or Rest tweaks desired for this? On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Swapnil Daingade <swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Just learned from Santosh that my email last night did not make it to the > mailing list. > resending... > > Regards > Swapnil > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Swapnil Daingade <swapnil.daing...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:00 AM > Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope > To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org > > > > I think Myriad HA is also in good shape. We discussed work preserving NM > restart internally and it looks like it is disabled by default in Apache > Hadoop. > > https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/NodeManagerRestart.html > > All 3 major distro's seem to have it disabled by default. I think we can > revisit it in the next Myriad release. > For the time being we can continue with the NM + Executor merge. It too has > been tried out and reviewed by Darin and Santosh. > > The current PR we have for Myriad state store implementation should work > for phase1. > There is some additional work required for supporting FGS that I am working > on. > Should be able to complete by the time FGS is merged into phase1. > > Regards > Swapnil > > > > Santosh Marella wrote: > > I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses moving to > hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently reviewed by > Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and 2.7.x > clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are more > reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is merged > into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > > Thanks, > Santosh > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > > > > We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues use it > yet. > I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work under > Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to get our > first Apache release out ASAP. > We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases with > other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel free to > correct me or disagree with this approach.) > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > > Regards > Swapnil >
