Hi,
Thanks for your kind answer. Currently, _Korean team relies on Sun's
build_ and provide it through Korean NL website. And, my question was
about smoke testing which allows to change rc3 build into stable one.
As far as I know, if community submits a report that rc3 is
satisfactory to
On 10/26/05, Andre Schnabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You don't need to present the full results. We are used to trust in the
local QA represantatives. If they give a GO, we accept this in most
cases. So .. best (and fastes way) is, if your QA team updates the
status page and files an
+1 for extensions.openoffice.org
--- Charles-H.Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Laurent,
+1 for this project from my side (although I doubt
it'll have any
weight)! :-)
Laurent Godard wrote:
Here are the propositions
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
-
From: Joerg Barfurth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:45:05 +0200
-1,
We already have a cvs module named 'extensions' in the 'util' project.
Another example is external, which is even worst.
--
Pavel Janík
In case you're wondering what's the reason for this spate
From: Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:14:36 +0200
Hi,
- addon.openoffice.org (already 1 vote)
I'd prefer addons...
--
Pavel Janík
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are
different.
-- Larry McVoy
Hi john
I think the rules are that the proposal must be discussed on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, i ommitted this list
i send the mail immediatelly
You may also have trouble getting hold of LS-P this week as he's
travelling around the Far East...
email are so kind for waiting in servers to be