Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello, I'd go for the first or the third option. Charles, On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 01:34 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: Hello all, We were talking about holding the conf at #ooonlc I just sent an email about moderating the channel. This means that we need a channel op there to change the

Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Daniel Carrera
Pavel Janík wrote: Please have a look at VOICE privilege on IRC. Yes, I know about voice. And during the talk itself and the QA all we need is voice. But when the talk first starts an op has to be there to set the channel to +m and after the QA set it back to -m. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera

Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Daniel Carrera
Charles-H.Schulz wrote: I'd go for the first or the third option. Sure. Whatever floats your boat. :-) As long as we can make this work without pulling any teeth... Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org

Re: [native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-24 Thread Pavel Janík
From: Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:27:32 -0500 need is voice. But when the talk first starts an op has to be there to set the channel to +m and after the QA set it back to -m. You seem to already have op access to @ooonlc ;-) -- Pavel Jank

[native-lang] IRC Conf -- channel op

2005-02-23 Thread Daniel Carrera
Hello all, We were talking about holding the conf at #ooonlc I just sent an email about moderating the channel. This means that we need a channel op there to change the channel modes. I can see 3 solutions: 1) Give channel op to whoever is speaking. 2) Give channel op to whoever is