Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-25 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
Hi, Goran Rakic wrote: You can remove sr-CS and sh-YU from a list. I don't know how those two showed up, but we are using sr for Serbian Cyrillic translation and sh for Serbian Latin. I am afraid, but I cannot remove them until we understand the reasons why languages such as sr-CS and sh-YU

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
Hi, The translation coverage of OOo 3.0.0 is now summarized in the wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_3.0#Coverage Regards, Tora - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Tora, The translation coverage of OOo 3.0.0 is now summarized in the wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_3.0#Coverage thanks a lot! Florian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, tora - Takamichi Akiyama schrieb: Hi, The translation coverage of OOo 3.0.0 is now summarized in the wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_3.0#Coverage hmm .. this looks a little strange to me. You count 37,551 strings for UI translation. Looking at pootle, we

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread Erdal Ronahi
Is it easy to obtain such statistics from the Pootle? Quite easy: http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/de/index.html for the overview and http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/de/openoffice_org/ and http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/de/helpcontent2/ for more detailed statistics. Note that Pootle counts

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
Hi, Erdal Ronahi wrote: Is it easy to obtain such statistics from the Pootle? http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/de/index.html Thanks a lot! The Pootle seems to cover 31 languages instead of 108 ones. http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/ Anyway, it says German has been almost completely

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-24 Thread Goran Rakic
У чет, 25. 09 2008. у 13:30 +0900, tora - Takamichi Akiyama пише: Now, German has translation coverage of round-up-ed 100% UI and 100% Help. Regards, Tora You can remove sr-CS and sh-YU from a list. I don't know how those two showed up, but we are using sr for Serbian Cyrillic translation

[native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-18 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, does anyone has the current number of supported languages for our 3.0 PR? We currently have 80 there, but I guess the number is a little bit higher, slightly over 90? Florian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-18 Thread Jeongkyu Kim
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Florian Effenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, does anyone has the current number of supported languages for our 3.0 PR? We currently have 80 there, but I guess the number is a little bit higher, slightly over 90? I thought the number is 76 from the

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-18 Thread Badral Sanligiin
Hi all, + Mongolian. Badral Am Freitag, den 19.09.2008, 03:14 +0900 schrieb Jeongkyu Kim: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Florian Effenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, does anyone has the current number of supported languages for our 3.0 PR? We currently have 80 there, but I

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-18 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, I'm pretty sure we were about 90, but I can't confirm it at the moment... Florian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [native-lang] current number of supported languages

2008-09-18 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
I'd second that, but then, we have various languages at various stages of completion. I'll say around 100 just for the number, and I can't be that wrong... Best, Charles. Le 18 sept. 08 à 21:04, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, I'm pretty sure we were about 90, but I can't confirm it