- sobota 27. června 2020 10:06:56 CEST, Geertjan Wielenga -
> Azul would most likely want to include functionality for selecting, using,
> and updating Zulu from within their bundle of NetBeans. I.e., so that when
> Java development is done in the NetBeans bundled with Zulu, the developer
> can cho
>
>
> In case of Batik, there may be someone creating a plugin for NetBeans 12.0
> that depends on it. It is (shall be) in our interest to make sure that
> such
> plugin continues to work "eternally".
In fact, here is one right now (I've been giving some vector editor
goodness to my old modularit
Funny, I implemented HighlightsContainer a while back for performance
reasons (coalescing large numbers of overlapping highlights resulting in
multi-second hangs), for the Antlr preview stuff where the highlighting
gets regenerated frequently and can be very complex. A handy library for
that (and
> > > The thing is that now you cannot remove Batik (easily). It has
> > > become part of the NetBeans platform and shall be supported (until
> > > EOL). OracleLabs has already changed the build of IGV to rely on
> > > platform's provided Batik libraries.
> >
> > So, it looks like it is API as opp
+1, I like Zulu and use it. Would definitely make it an easy install.
As for the specialized distribution, I concur with Neil. If we could make
an API or plugin that could be used by any JDK vendor to create a
distribution, then I think that would be the best route.
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.
+1
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:58 PM Tim Boudreau wrote:
> I think if Azul is asking for some labor from the community here, some sort
> of contribution of value that supports the community might be a nice idea.
>
> Like, say, hosting update center mirrors or, given that mirror-based
> updates see
I think if Azul is asking for some labor from the community here, some sort
of contribution of value that supports the community might be a nice idea.
Like, say, hosting update center mirrors or, given that mirror-based
updates seem to be proving problematic for some people on corporate
networks,
+1
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:06 AM Patrick Musembi
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 09:33 Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If Azul were to distribute a bundle of NetBeans with Zulu, i.e., the
> bundle
> > would be downloadable from an Azul domain, would we as a community be
>
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.06.2020, 09:12 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 07:13, Jaroslav Tulach <
> jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > - is any of it API? I still think we'd be better looking at
> > > svgSalamander, given option to use in FlatLaf and that Karl
> > > appears
Right, these are good and simpler ideas. Yes, simply Apache NetBeans is the
idea.
If we can do 2) then the problem is simple and solved.
So, how would bundles pre-include plugins?
Gj
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 09:07, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
Hi,
what is correct way how to include third party file as test file for unit tests?
Related PR is here: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2208
Files testRealFile_01.latte, testRealFile_03.latte and testRealFile_04.latte
were in Oracle repository
(https://hg.netbeans.org/releases/file/5fd
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 09:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> Azul would most likely want to include functionality for selecting, using,
> and updating Zulu from within their bundle of NetBeans. I.e., so that when
> Java development is done in the NetBeans bundled with Zulu, the developer
> can choos
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 07:36, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote: ```
> --release
> Compile for a specific VM version. Supported targets: 6, 7, 8, 9,
> 10, 11
> ```
> modifying our build scripts to use it on JDK9+ would avoid the `ByteBuffer`
> & co. issues.
>From recollection, Ant, unlike Maven, d
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 07:13, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> > - is any of it API? I still think we'd be better looking at
> > svgSalamander, given option to use in FlatLaf and that Karl appears to
> > now be maintaining it.
> >
>
> The thing is that now you cannot remove Batik (easily). It has become
Azul would most likely want to include functionality for selecting, using,
and updating Zulu from within their bundle of NetBeans. I.e., so that when
Java development is done in the NetBeans bundled with Zulu, the developer
can choose Zulu and also keep their Zulu install updated.
This would not b
+1
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 09:33 Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If Azul were to distribute a bundle of NetBeans with Zulu, i.e., the bundle
> would be downloadable from an Azul domain, would we as a community be
> interested in doing the work of putting that bundle together?
>
> It would b
16 matches
Mail list logo
