Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-20 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:40, John Mc wrote: > Oh I totally understand, and I've not been active recently Yes, me neither much with this release cycle unfortunately ... :-\ > I definitely didn't want to -1 the release > but wanted to call it out in case it was missed by others. JFTR, my

Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-19 Thread Scott Palmer
Just a note about not filing a bug report. The bug is with Apple, I filed a bug with them while Big Sur was still in beta - hoping that it would be addressed before the release. While testing NB 12.2, there were no installers and I always copy the binaries over my existing install and then

Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-19 Thread Christian Oyarzun
>Btw. does `netbeans --jdkhome //` also work? Yes it does. It never hits the /usr/libexec/java_home logic if that variable is set. >Mind you, part of me thinks that anyone who upgrades to a new macOS >within a year of release is just asking for trouble anyway ... Agreed, which is why I have

Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-19 Thread John Mc
> > > > Totally agree, although also agree with Laszlo's annoyance about lack > of critical / blocking issue, and I think also the 0 votes. Be active > not passive - call it! :-) > > > Oh I totally understand, and I've not been active recently (Find myself doing more and more C# at work) around

Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-19 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 08:33, John Mc wrote: > > 12.0 LTS, that should be our focus. At the end 12.2 is just "dev version", > > but > > we should fix 12.0 LTS in my opinion. > > > Is it just a "dev version"? Or is it just a release that has a shorter > support cycle? Definitely the latter! In

Re: BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-19 Thread John Mc
> > > 12.0 LTS, that should be our focus. At the end 12.2 is just "dev version", > but > we should fix 12.0 LTS in my opinion. > > Is it just a "dev version"? Or is it just a release that has a shorter support cycle? Anyways that besides the point, we're releasing software, that software in my

BigSur fix for LTS and 12.2.1 was: Release Apache NetBeans 12.2 (vote candidate 1)

2020-11-18 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
> 0 (binding) I have seen few "zero" votes and I appreciate your nice attitude of not blocking the 12.2! Thank you, I am eagerly waiting for the vote to finish, so we can proceed with other votes on derived complementary binaries. > Having submitted the pull request, I think it would be better