Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
+1 (binding) -jt út 16. 7. 2019 v 20:49 odesílatel Alessandro napsal: > +1 (not binding) > > Downloaded and verified sha512 digest > Checked NOTICE and LICENSE > Built basic cluster with Oracle JDK 8 on Ubuntu Linux 18.04 > Launched built artefact > > Greets, > Alex > > > Il giorno mar 16 lug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
+1 (binding) Gj On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:11 AM Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -jt > > > út 16. 7. 2019 v 20:49 odesílatel Alessandro > napsal: > > > +1 (not binding) > > > > Downloaded and verified sha512 digest > > Checked NOTICE and LICENSE > > Built basic cluster with Oracle JDK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Kai Uwe Pel
+1 binding Thanks Kai On 7/16/2019 5:57 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: Dear all, This is our second voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans, following 11.1-beta4 and a fix to the critical issue that made us pull the first vote. There have been no changes between beta4 and this vo

Re: JavaFX Wrapper should be updated

2019-07-17 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
Just make sure you don't break anything on JDK8, JDK9, JDK10, JDK11, ..., etc. FYI: http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/org-openide-modules/apichanges.html#javafx.lib -jt út 16. 7. 2019 v 16:15 odesílatel Geertjan Wielenga napsal: > Toni is not using it, see above. > > Gj > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread John McDonnell
+1 binding On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 08:54, Kai Uwe Pel wrote: > +1 binding > > Thanks > Kai > > > On 7/16/2019 5:57 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > This is our second voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache > > NetBeans, following 11.1-beta4 and a fix to the critical issue

Re: ? about project properties..

2019-07-17 Thread Jan Lahoda
FWIW, I believe there are some corner cases where type inference works differently under source level 8 compared to source level 7. So my personal approach so far was to upgrade source level for modules I was modifying and where I want to use lambdas, as I could more easily see the potential iss

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Mike Billman
+1 (non-binding) The one issue I had with beta2 is resolved 😊 Mike -Original Message- From: John McDonnell Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 4:17 AM To: dev@netbeans.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2] +1 binding On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 08:54, K

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (non binding) the upgrade from 11.0 work like charm tested the binaries on Linux + AdoptOpenJDK12 Enrico Il giorno mer 17 lug 2019 alle ore 14:50 Mike Billman < mikebill...@qcsoftware.com> ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > The one issue I had with beta2 is resolved 😊 > > Mike > > -Origi

building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Glenn Holmer
NetBeans 11.1 is supposed to build under JDK11, isn't it? I downloaded the vc2 source and typed "ant" in the root directory, but got "You are attempting to build NetBeans using JDK 9 (or higher). This is forbidden as it may lead to accidental usage of JDK 9+ APIs." What am I doing wrong? I'm using

Re: building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
You're also told in the error message about the option to set to override that message. It's not needed anymore, that blocker, but it can be overridden via that command line option. Gj On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Glenn Holmer wrote: > NetBeans 11.1 is supposed to build under JDK11, isn't i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 7/16/19 10:57 AM, Neil C Smith wrote: > This is our second voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache > NetBeans +1 (binding) downloaded vc2 source, verified sha512sum, built from source using OpenJDK 11.0.2 -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came t

Re: building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 7/17/19 9:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > You're also told in the error message about the option to set to override > that message. Wait... you mean I have to read the error message? Horrors! voted +1 -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the afterma

Re: building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Hurray. :-) Gj On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:57 PM Glenn Holmer wrote: > On 7/17/19 9:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > You're also told in the error message about the option to set to override > > that message. > > Wait... you mean I have to read the error message? Horrors! > > voted +1 > > -- >

Re: building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi. Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2019, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > It's not needed anymore, that blocker, but it can be overridden via > that command line option. there is a sound reason to keep it. JDK 9 introduced incompatible changes and if you build against JDK 9 or newer the resulting

Re: building under JDK11

2019-07-17 Thread Neil C Smith
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 16:10, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2019, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > It's not needed anymore, that blocker, but it can be overridden via > > that command line option. > > there is a sound reason to keep it. JDK 9 introduced incompatible >

Re: Re: ? about project properties..

2019-07-17 Thread Eric Bresie
Not sure if this (as of Java 9) may impact things at some point... http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/182 Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com > On July 17, 2019 at 3:43:47 AM CDT, Jan Lahoda wrote: > FWIW, I believe there are some corner cases where type inference works > differently under source level 8 c

Re: ? about project properties..

2019-07-17 Thread Brad Walker
I'm not sure how to respond.. But, I'll try anyways.. 8-) First a little bit of background about me. I design software in the embedded space. So my interest in using NetBeans revolves around the C/C++ plugin module. I don't use Java in my professional life but do like using it. It's also interest

Fwd: kotlin plugin

2019-07-17 Thread Jonathan Bergh
Hi all, I was just wondering what happened with the donation of the Kotlin plugin to the Apache Netbeans project - did they ever go through with this? Is this still a need for Apache NB with the advent of Language Servers etc on the horizon? I would like to start getting acquainted with NB platf

Re: kotlin plugin

2019-07-17 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
You can see the new comment I added in the issue you referenced, today: https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin-netbeans/issues/137 Gj On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:38 PM Jonathan Bergh wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just wondering what happened with the donation of the Kotlin plugin > to the Apache Netb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Junichi Yamamoto
+1 (binding) All the best, Junichi On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:58 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is our second voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache > NetBeans, following 11.1-beta4 and a fix to the critical issue that > made us pull the first vote. There have been no ch

Re: AW: website build system: moving to node/npm?

2019-07-17 Thread Tim Boudreau
FWIW... 1. Calling out to node from gradle/java/whatever as an external process to generate some CSS from sass is pretty trivial and I don't see why it would be an ordeal to integrate into the existing website build. There *are* a lot of toolchains for building static websites with node that aim

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread huang kai
+1 (bindinng) 发送自我的 BlackBerry - 安全智能手机 发件人: junichi0...@gmail.com 发送时间: 2019年7月18日 07:29 收件人: dev@netbeans.apache.org 回复: dev@netbeans.apache.org 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2] +1 (binding) All the best, Junichi On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:58 AM Neil C Smith wr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Junichi Yamamoto
Change +1 to 0, sorry. I could not reproduce [1] in beta4. However, I can reproduce it in vc2. It seems that PHP feature is not activated automatically after Oracle JS Parser Implementation is installed (during opening a PHP project). Workarounds: - Reboot NetBeans - Activate PHP manually then re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread David Green
+1 SHA sums on source and bin match. Dropping ‘netbeans’ folder into the Apache NetBeans 11.1.app (view package contents, replace the netbeans in Resources with new NetBeans vc2 (as a workaround till the packaged version available). Deleted the 11.1 user directory and did not import the prio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

2019-07-17 Thread Laszlo Kishalmi
+1 (binding) What was checked: Checksum - OK Signatures - OK LICENSE, NOTICE, DEPENDENCIES - OK NOTICE Year - OK Build from Source - OK Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK8 - OK Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK12 - OK Run Snap on Ubuntu - OK No binaries, except for empty.jar and in tests - OK License Headers o