If you're solving this, it might be nice to also integrate this into the
building of maven artifacts so POMs have a section - lots of
people use these for product license audits.
-Tim
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 4:30 PM Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.06.2019, 15:34
It won't magically happen on Gradle. The support needs to be patched for
that. Hopefully not a big deal and might catch the release train...
On 6/19/19 4:50 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
That is great.
Is "Java EE 8 Web" correct as a label or should it have "Jakarta" there in
some way instead?
Hi all,
I vote +1.
Regards,
Jose.
El mié., 19 jun. 2019 a las 7:52, Gaurav Gupta ()
escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Payara Server integration is based on Apache NetBeans GlassFish modules
> which supports Payara Server v4.1.144 to v5.192 with additional features
> like payara-web.xml DD editor, JDK
See the previous thread, "NetBeans GUI icons, who drew them?"
I listed the various possible approaches at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/HiDPI+%28Retina%29+improvements
. Downsides to using an existing icon library include: (1) quite a few
NetBeans icons will have no
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.06.2019, 19:56 +0200 schrieb David Schulz:
> Makes sense, we could also check some Icon libraries like Streamline
> or Icon8 to use them as a base for our icon rework. Not sure how the
> apache license works with icon libraries like that, any opinions?
I think this is
Makes sense, we could also check some Icon libraries like Streamline or Icon8
to use them as a base for our icon rework. Not sure how the apache license
works with icon libraries like that, any opinions?
Best,
Dave
From: Eirik Bakke
Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 17:12
To:
It means those Oracle apps are built on top of NetBeans and the devs from
Oracle Labs are about to move to the latest Apache NetBeans release. In
short, “import”, in a way.
Gj
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 19:26, Glenn Holmer
wrote:
> On 6/19/19 11:43 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> > [IGV](
> >
>
On 6/19/19 11:43 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> [IGV](
> https://www.graalvm.org/docs/graalvm-as-a-platform/implement-language/#igv)
> stands for Ideal Graph Visualizer and it is a great way to get an insight
> into what kind of optimizations the Graal compiler does when generating the
> native code
[IGV](
https://www.graalvm.org/docs/graalvm-as-a-platform/implement-language/#igv)
stands for Ideal Graph Visualizer and it is a great way to get an insight
into what kind of optimizations the Graal compiler does when generating the
native code for your bytecodes.
-jt
st 19. 6. 2019 v 16:30
And of course I would love to recruit David to help with the SVGification of
NetBeans icons :-) But I know it's a big boring task...
(SVG icons will soon be supported, for improving NetBeans' appearance on HiDPI
displays, once the PR at https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1278 is
finalized
If it's not urgent for legal/trademark reasons, it would be natural to do this
as part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2617 ("Redraw common
icons in SVG"). Added a comment about this.
See https://people.csail.mit.edu/ebakke/misc/netbeans-icons/prioritized.html
for a list of
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 4:02 AM wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> We use Code Signing service for signing NetBeans installers.
>
> Is there an action required to continue using this?
>
I hadn't seen any production signings, so didn't realize that you were
already using this.
At this stage, the thing
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:37 AM wrote:
>
> Production signing of Windows installer is one that I haven't tried yet
> and it is not free.
>
> Other is limited testing of installers.
>
Please don't feel constrained by the 'not free' portion of production
signing. As long as you have validated with
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 14:17, Sven Reimers wrote:
>
> For the activation,
>
> - open plugins dialog
> - select installed tab.
> - check all checkboxes
> - press activate button.
Thanks, that triggers it for me too - so looks like it's installing
from the notification bubble?
Out of interest,
Hi all,
Payara Server integration is based on Apache NetBeans GlassFish modules
which supports Payara Server v4.1.144 to v5.192 with additional features
like payara-web.xml DD editor, JDK 11, and connection pool properties, etc.
And Payara Micro integration supports Payara Micro v 4.1.2.174 to
Hi Geertjan,
I think for this release "Java EE 8" is the correct label. We do not yet
have a release of "Jakarta EE 8". However, I will put in a PR once that
has occurred.
I will test the Ant and Gradle based Java web projects to see how things
work with the Java EE 8 integration.
Thanks
On
Some of what you describe, specifically the downloading of JavaFX, may be
related to this: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/917
Gj
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:43 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 15:29, Sven Reimers wrote:
> > Hi just ran NetBeans 11.1 beta 1 on
Hi David and Chris,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2727
That would be a great item to have resolved, i.e., remove the blue NetBeans
icon and use the new one instead, together with similar or some different
overlay on top to indicate the difference between them in functionality.
Hi Geertjan,
You are correct. The drop-down you've mentioned should now include "Java
EE 8 Web" as an option.
Additionally, if you right-click on an existing Maven Web Project using
Java EE 7 or less, the Project Properties dialog "Run" panel now contains
"Java EE 8 Web" as a Java EE Version.
Great, thanks Josh. Just to understand what this consists of -- when I go
to the New Project dialog and I choose "Java with Maven" and then "Web
Application" and click Next, and Next again, there is a "Java EE Version"
drop-down, which now has "Java EE 7 Web", "Java EE 6 Web", and "Java EE 5".
Thanks Neil, for the information. I created the PR for Java EE 8
integration, and those enhancements are specifically geared towards Maven
projects. The PR includes the following functionality:
- Ability to create a new Maven Web Project using Java EE 8 (utilizes a
Java EE 8 maven archetype)
-
Hi All,
This email follows some off-list discussion with various people
including Geertjan and the relevant contributors. The release
schedule we agreed has an open question about allowing selective
feature freeze bypass based on mailing list agreement - hence ...
I propose we allow the pending
Hi All,
We're obviously still getting our heads around how the new release
process will work in practice, and one thing we still need to firm up
is how to handle tagging and merging PRs to master outside of the
merge windows. I'd like to propose the following for NB 11.1, to be
reviewed after
Hi David,
We use Code Signing service for signing NetBeans installers.
Is there an action required to continue using this?
Thanks,
Reema
On 19/06/19 9:29 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks,
Apologies for the interruption of your regularly scheduled project discussion.
Infra is in the
24 matches
Mail list logo