Re: Rust, anyone?

Hello there. There has already been something about Rust (written in JavaCC). Ioannis. On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:18 AM Antonio wrote: > Thanks Michael! > > D'oh! My intents to add Rust to the NetBeans core (very much as in

distribute question

Hello Can i distribute my paid program based on NB with my own closed module/s without any changing base NB platform modules/core? I found a way how to make NB great again.

Re: Dependent PRs.

Thanks, Laszlo! сб, 11 февр. 2023 г. в 15:16, Laszlo Kishalmi : > Yes that kind of thing is a bit hard to crack and could be itchy. > > I'd prefer the 1st option, the 3rd could also work in some cases. > > So, wait till your PR gets merged. Do something else during that time. > You can also have

Extract Interface...

I'm starting to work with some unfamiliar code. For example I've got class DerivedTableModel extends AbstractTableModel class DerivedJTable extends JTable I want a list of all methods in DerivedTableModel that are not in AbstractTableModel. I tried "Refactor > ExtractInterface" but the

Re: Compatibility with JDK 8: Shift work to people wanting it (was: Re: Lets talk about JDK 8 (new year edition))

While I appreciate Jaroslav's point about libraries being compatible with a wide variety of Java versions, we do have to balance that with keeping up with recent developments and the extra effort it entails to avoid using modern features that are otherwise available. I personally don't see an

Re: Compatibility with JDK 8: Shift work to people wanting it (was: Re: Lets talk about JDK 8 (new year edition))

On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 19:11 Matthias Bläsing, wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, dem 10.02.2023 um 10:12 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:02, Matthias Bläsing > > > wrote: > > > - commit to make NetBeans runnable on JDK LTS -1 > > > - build with JDK LTS -1 > > > - be able to

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

Thanks Neil Gonna try it. I'll keep posting. BR, === Edwin F. López A. ===

Re: Compatibility with JDK 8: Shift work to people wanting it (was: Re: Lets talk about JDK 8 (new year edition))

Hi, Am Freitag, dem 10.02.2023 um 10:12 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:02, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > - commit to make NetBeans runnable on JDK LTS -1 > > - build with JDK LTS -1 > > - be able to be build with the current JDK > > +1 as long as that includes the

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 16:29 Edwin F., wrote: > Can I please have the url where these boms are available? > I'm interested initially in the bom that has the required dependencies for > the database module to work on its own. > I wonder if the kit module covers what you're looking for though?

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

Hi Antonio. Yes, I checked them, but I assumed that was the initial conversation :-D Anyways, thanks for answering my question. I'll think about it. Is there any resource you can point me to at learning about contributions? Thanks. BR, === Edwin F. López A.

Re: Gradle Distribution Settings

I’m an odd ball with more than just my Gradle setup 藍 Basically I just want to use the latest version unless I need to pin it down for compatibility. That lets me see when I’m using something that has been deprecated etc. Regarding the Gradle User Home setting… I think these days the people

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

Hi Edwin, I was pointing to two old threads that talked about adding BOMs to NetBeans that Neil was talking about. The fact is that we don't have a BOM yet. But contributions are welcome :-). Cheers, Antonio On 12/2/23 17:28, Edwin F. wrote: Can I please have the url where these boms are

Re: Bill of Materials POMs for Netbeans Modules

Thanks Antonio. Can I please have the url where these boms are available? I'm interested initially in the bom that has the required dependencies for the database module to work on its own. Thanks a lot. BR, === Edwin F. López A. === El vie, 10 feb 2023 a

Re: Rust, anyone?

Thanks Michael! D'oh! My intents to add Rust to the NetBeans core (very much as in the Linux kernel case) have been detected! :-D Latest commits solve these issues, though (and add new bugs). Next challenge: Cargo workspaces [1]. Cheers, Antonio [1]

Re: How to incorporate MIT source code?

On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 09:06 Antonio, wrote: > I've updated the "licenseinfo.xml" (adding the proper license in > nbbuild/licenses. Question is, shall I mantain the original MIT license > header in the file as well as the Apache one such as in [1]? > Yes. I covered that with ASF link in my

Re: Gradle Distribution Settings

sounds good to me. regarding the gradle custom dist selection: One argument for keeping it would be to have parity to maven which is still fairly similar in setup, it has daemons, wrappers etc. The UI has a dist selector too - I use that one sometimes. But I do also agree that it is more

Re: How to incorporate MIT source code?

Thanks, Laszlo, I've updated the "licenseinfo.xml" (adding the proper license in nbbuild/licenses. Question is, shall I mantain the original MIT license header in the file as well as the Apache one such as in [1]? On other news, I generate the grammars at build time with [2] (using the

Re: Rust, anyone?

well, I just wrote my first Rust program in NetBeans - great work Antonio! already added the 'Rust' label :) for others who want to give it a try: I had to fix two things to make the build pass:  - removed references of RustPackage in org.openide.nodes.Node (probably a happy coding accident)