On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:37 AM wrote:
>
> Production signing of Windows installer is one that I haven't tried yet
> and it is not free.
>
> Other is limited testing of installers.
>
Please don't feel constrained by the 'not free' portion of production
signing. As long as you have validated with
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 14:56, wrote:
> On 18/06/19 5:40 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 13:32, wrote:
> >> I have created build job [1] for generating installers for Windows
> >> and Linux. Mac installer needs to be built locally.
> > Can you confirm the reasons and
On 18/06/19 5:40 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 13:32, wrote:
I have created build job [1] for generating installers for Windows
and Linux. Mac installer needs to be built locally.
Can you confirm the reasons and requirements for the local Mac build?
Apache infra
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 13:32, wrote:
> I have created build job [1] for generating installers for Windows
> and Linux. Mac installer needs to be built locally.
Can you confirm the reasons and requirements for the local Mac build?
> This build job currently points to zip generated from a
All the sources for these generated installers are in Apache NetBeans
GitHub and the entire generation process is handled by the Apache build
process.
Hence there should be nothing preventing these installers as being released
as convenience binaries as part of the 11.1 release.
Gj
On Mon, 17
