Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
It means versions for specific releases(e.g. 11.2, 12.0, ...). Thanks, Junichi On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:12 AM Eric Bresie wrote: > > Silly question, what is meant by "milestone" in this context? > > Is this meaning something like a notional gate type mile stone (i.e. > "feature-freeze", "ready-for-rc", etc.) or a milestone symbolizing a > "target" for a specific release (i.e. 11.2 pre-release, 11.2 release > candidate, 11.2 vote candidate, 11.2 final release, etc.) > > Eric Bresie > ebre...@gmail.com > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:17 PM Junichi Yamamoto > wrote: > > > Thank you. > > Let's add milestones as much as possible. That makes it clear that we > > add PRs to which version. > > Let's also use labels if needed after feature freeze. > > > > I'll add 11.2 as a milestone. > > > > Best regards, > > Junichi > > > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Reimers > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 for milestones > > > > > > -Sven > > > > > > Christian Lenz schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, > > 11:11: > > > > > > > +1 for Milestones. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Junichi Yamamoto > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 12:29 > > > > An: dev@netbeans.apache.org > > > > Betreff: Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels > > > > > > > > I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if > > > > some people are worried about visibility. > > > > That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search > > > > PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not > > > > required, I suppose. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Junichi > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto < > > junichi0...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > > > > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions > > are > > > > > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again > > continue to > > > > > > increase. > > > > > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version > > labels. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > > > > > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > > > > > > > > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > > > > > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 > > around > > > > > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > > > > > releases are still active. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
Silly question, what is meant by "milestone" in this context? Is this meaning something like a notional gate type mile stone (i.e. "feature-freeze", "ready-for-rc", etc.) or a milestone symbolizing a "target" for a specific release (i.e. 11.2 pre-release, 11.2 release candidate, 11.2 vote candidate, 11.2 final release, etc.) Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:17 PM Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > Thank you. > Let's add milestones as much as possible. That makes it clear that we > add PRs to which version. > Let's also use labels if needed after feature freeze. > > I'll add 11.2 as a milestone. > > Best regards, > Junichi > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Reimers > wrote: > > > > +1 for milestones > > > > -Sven > > > > Christian Lenz schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, > 11:11: > > > > > +1 for Milestones. > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Junichi Yamamoto > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 12:29 > > > An: dev@netbeans.apache.org > > > Betreff: Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels > > > > > > I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if > > > some people are worried about visibility. > > > That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search > > > PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not > > > required, I suppose. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Junichi > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto < > junichi0...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > > > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions > are > > > > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again > continue to > > > > > increase. > > > > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version > labels. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > > > > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > > > > > > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > > > > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 > around > > > > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > > > > releases are still active. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
Thank you. Let's add milestones as much as possible. That makes it clear that we add PRs to which version. Let's also use labels if needed after feature freeze. I'll add 11.2 as a milestone. Best regards, Junichi On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:06 PM Sven Reimers wrote: > > +1 for milestones > > -Sven > > Christian Lenz schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, 11:11: > > > +1 for Milestones. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > Von: Junichi Yamamoto > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 12:29 > > An: dev@netbeans.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels > > > > I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if > > some people are worried about visibility. > > That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search > > PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not > > required, I suppose. > > > > Thanks, > > Junichi > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto > > wrote: > > > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are > > > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to > > > > increase. > > > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > > > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > > > > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > > > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 around > > > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > > > releases are still active. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
+1 for milestones -Sven Christian Lenz schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, 11:11: > +1 for Milestones. > > > Cheers > > Chris > > > > Von: Junichi Yamamoto > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 12:29 > An: dev@netbeans.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels > > I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if > some people are worried about visibility. > That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search > PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not > required, I suppose. > > Thanks, > Junichi > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto > wrote: > > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are > > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to > > > increase. > > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. > > > What do you think? > > > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 around > > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > > releases are still active. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Neil > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > >
AW: Propose using milestones instead of labels
+1 for Milestones. Cheers Chris Von: Junichi Yamamoto Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 12:29 An: dev@netbeans.apache.org Betreff: Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if some people are worried about visibility. That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not required, I suppose. Thanks, Junichi On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to > > increase. > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. > > What do you think? > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 around > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > releases are still active. > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
I propose that we mark versions using both labels and milestones if some people are worried about visibility. That way, we can remove version labels without problems(we can search PRs for specific versions even if labels are removed) if they are not required, I suppose. Thanks, Junichi On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are > > released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to > > increase. > > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. > > What do you think? > > +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and > they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. > > We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the > only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 around > for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the > releases are still active. > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Propose using milestones instead of labels
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 00:54, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub > repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are > released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to > increase. > So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. > What do you think? +0 - I've found pros and cons to milestones on other projects, and they're a little less visible. OTOH, other features might be useful. We can also delete labels that are no longer required, if that's the only concern to be addressed. If so, please keep 11.0 and 11.1 around for now - they do potentially have a purpose post release while the releases are still active. Best wishes, Neil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Propose using milestones instead of labels
Hi all, Currently, we are using labels to mark specific versions in GitHub repo. However, Version labels are never used after those versions are released. It means version labels which we don't use again continue to increase. So, I suppose that we should use milestones instead of version labels. What do you think? Thanks, Junichi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
