ential problem I was imagining is
not too relevant.
-- Eirik
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bien
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2023 10:37 PM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org; Eirik Bakke
Subject: Re: maven indexing tweaks
On 18.03.23 14:41, Eirik Bakke wrote:
> - "sliding window" tim
inal Message-
From: Michael Bien
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 8:26 PM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org; Antonio
Subject: Re: maven indexing tweaks
On 17.03.23 22:38, Antonio wrote:
Hi,
These are impressive savings!
yeah I am pretty happy about the results too. Esp the removal of the
sha1 fi
s artifact in the cache".
-- Eirik
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bien
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 8:26 PM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org; Antonio
Subject: Re: maven indexing tweaks
On 17.03.23 22:38, Antonio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are impressive savings!
yeah I am pr
On 17.03.23 22:38, Antonio wrote:
Hi,
These are impressive savings!
yeah I am pretty happy about the results too. Esp the removal of the
sha1 field had a great effect. Technically we do actually offer this as
query through the public API, however, it doesn't appear as anything is
using it
Hi,
These are impressive savings!
Out of curiosity, we don't build the index incrementally using Maven's
IndexReader, do we? That's why we download the whole index, right?
Thanks,
Antonio
[1]
Hello everyone,
I experimented a bit with the maven index extraction process and got
some pretty good results (I think).
There might be a way to filter the index during extraction without
noteworthy overhead, which allows the following:
- "sliding window" time filters, e.g drop all
