Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Wait, wait, wait, let's be honest: I just did a simple webpage! Merit is due to Emilian for assembling the release (this is way more complicated), and to all those making 9.0 RC1 possible [1]. Those are my heroes of the RC1 release. Thanks all, I'll try to allocate more time in the future to

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Congratulations, especially to Emilian for managing the release and Antonio for doing the related website updates. Gj On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Antonio wrote: > http://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90-rc1.html > > Congratulations everybody! > > On 28/05/18 22:35, Emilian Bold

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

http://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90-rc1.html Congratulations everybody! On 28/05/18 22:35, Emilian Bold wrote: ANNOUNCE email sent: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1eb3e248e4f4f980ee21d4d3d103ed7ce17020e62489ba4be89e0a9a@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Let's update the

NetBeans 2018W21 Weekly Report

Dear all, I'm one day late with the weekly report. I'm sorry, it's the memorial day weekend. So the last week was in full NetBeans 9.0 RC1 vibe we have resolved 11 issues 9 of them were license related. We have 662 (+41) open issues: 445 (+37) bugs, 128(+5) improvements, 34 feature

Re: Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

> Considering William L. Thomson Jr. single-handledly did the Gentoo build > system for NetBeans using portage it doesn't seem like an impossible task. Most modules will be pretty simple - it's those that, say bundle runtimes and things like that whose builds are non-trivial. That may be less of

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Please wait for the ANNOUNCE email first. All the votes links are tracked here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 The downloads should be https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-rc1/ --emi

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

ANNOUNCE email sent: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1eb3e248e4f4f980ee21d4d3d103ed7ce17020e62489ba4be89e0a9a@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Let's update the website. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 28 May 2018 11:22 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > Please wait for the ANNOUNCE

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Hi Emilian, If you send me some links to votes and downloads I think we can update the website after the announcement: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/pull/45 Un abrazo, Antonio On 28/05/18 20:14, Emilian Bold wrote: Thanks to all who voted! The release has PASSED

[Mentors] Assembling NOTICE for ASF dependencies

Hello all, I was looking into: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-827 My first impression was: Everything is correct. The NOTICE file for commons-net reads: -- Apache Commons Net Copyright 2001-2017 The Apache Software

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

I think those things get dated quickly. People tend to like to have recognition IMO, and is why to me the plugin portal grew, and contrib faded off. It would also mean folks putting code there have to keep it up, and we have to rely on them to do so, and they have to be all in on the Apache

Re: output window coloring question

Yes you are right, if i switch back to old maven, it back to works. thanks Thanks From Peter From: cowwoc Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 2:36 AM To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: output window coloring question On a related note, Maven 5.0+ is

(Solved) incubator-netbeans-website "out of sync"

Hi all, So our jenkins job for rendering the website seems to be running properly [1], but our "asf-site" branch was not being published to the web server. Talked to the Infra guys, and they suggested "resyncing" the repository. There's a tool for this at:

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

Hi, On Mon, 28 May 2018, 19:02 Wade Chandler, wrote: > I think for the plugin portal, we could have a real simple registration > scheme that is a repository that has a particular structure for a publisher > with YAML files and images in it for plugin registration, and have a static > site

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Thanks to all who voted! The release has PASSED with the following IPMC votes: +1 Ate Douma (binding) +1 Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) +1 Mark Struberg (binding) +0 Justin Mclean (binding) Also, 3 community members voted +1 on the IPMC thread. 10 members of the Apache NetBeans PPMC and Apache

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

On May 28, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > > I don't think under Apache we will be able to have a NetBeans-endorsed > collection of 3rd party plugins. > > Clearly we won't be able to host them, but I'm not ever certain we could > attach the NetBeans (and Apache) brand to a repository

Re: Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

> When discussing[1] the build systems, have we also considered the Apache > view point - e.g. running Apache on Apache? From this perspective Ant and > Maven are +10... Coding in Apache Groovy using an Apache Subversion repository and an Apache Ant build system :-) > [1] I assume this thread

Re: Upload Maven bits was: Enable Nexus Access For NetBeans

Considering there is no public Apache NetBeans 9 that users may freely download it might be a very good idea that netbeans.org is still under Oracle control and users at least get to see some download button with an installer. (I would also be curious to see, at least on private@ some

Upload Maven bits was: Enable Nexus Access For NetBeans

Back to mailing list... Looks like my attempt to upload org.netbeans.html and other org.netbeans binaries to Maven repository hasn't succeeded. One of the reasons is that Oracle hasn't donated NetBeans trademark and netbeans.org domain to Apache yet. Surprising! I thought this was donated

Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

2018-05-25 16:58 GMT+02:00 Neil C Smith : > On Fri, 25 May 2018 at 02:02 Tim Boudreau wrote: > > > IMO, Gradle is a step backward for build systems - scriptability leads to > > fragile systems, and ones that are impossible for tools to reason about. >

Re: HTML/Java API goes to Gradle

Thanks a lot Hans, for connecting me with potential reviewers. Hello Piotr, Eric, [my PR](https://github.com/apache/ incubator-netbeans-html4j/pull/6) has already been merged, but I'll be thankful for any comments. I can fix them in another PR. Especially the way I [hook between compile and jar

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

I don't think under Apache we will be able to have a NetBeans-endorsed collection of 3rd party plugins. Clearly we won't be able to host them, but I'm not ever certain we could attach the NetBeans (and Apache) brand to a repository of code we don't really control or oversee much. I believe we

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

I like the idea. Good plan. Gj On Monday, May 28, 2018, Christian Lenz wrote: > Hey Devs, > > long time ago, there was mail thread (private) with Geertjan and a guy who > created an „organization“ on GitHub for NetBeans Plugins, where I wanted to > join and added all of

Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

Hey Devs, long time ago, there was mail thread (private) with Geertjan and a guy who created an „organization“ on GitHub for NetBeans Plugins, where I wanted to join and added all of my plugins to this repo, to have it under a global, public (official) repo for NetBeans. I don’t know what