t; > > why you can add a lot of stuff to the Java Editor with 3rd-party
> Plugins.
> > > If we are open-source, we should open minded too to let the Developers
> > > decide, whether I want to add my feature into the core and wait 6 month
> > > after it is relased to the n
a lot of stuff to the Java Editor with 3rd-party
> Plugins.
> > > If we are open-source, we should open minded too to let the Developers
> > > decide, whether I want to add my feature into the core and wait 6 month
> > > after it is relased to the next Vers
bring it up today or tomorrow.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Peter Hull
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. November 2018 09:06
> > An: dev.ataur.rah...@gmail.com
> > Cc: neilcsm...@apache.org; jiri.koval...@or
r 2018 09:06
> An: dev.ataur.rah...@gmail.com
> Cc: neilcsm...@apache.org; jiri.koval...@oracle.com; NetCAT team;
> NetBeans Mailing List; d...@netbeans.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap updates
>
> The 2 + 2 option makes sense to me. I'd be interested
it up today or
tomorrow.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Peter Hull
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. November 2018 09:06
An: dev.ataur.rah...@gmail.com
Cc: neilcsm...@apache.org; jiri.koval...@oracle.com; NetCAT team; NetBeans
Mailing List; d...@netbeans.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap
I'm also in favor of 2+2 releases.
For me it would also make sense to have only 2 major releases and deliver the
patch release fixes with the current update system, but I see no issue in
delivering 2 patch releases also.
My 2 cents.
The 2 + 2 option makes sense to me. I'd be interested in hearing
people's thoughts about how this lines up with JDK releases:
* Is it better to do the NB testing after the general availability of
the JDK, or aim to have them released about the same time?
* What versions of JDK does Netbeans need
I am just gonna put my opinion here in two line.
I support the idea of two major and two optional release a year.
I want to focus on updating my code, not IDE.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, 22:20 Jiří Kovalský I am glad to see that except two respondents the vast majority likes the
> proposal for only two mandatory major (with NetCAT programs) and two
> optional minor releases per year.
>
You could equally say that a vast majority of committers on dev@ wanted
We should not overreact yet.
My 2 cents
Cheers
Chris
Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2018 18:08
An: net...@netbeans.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap updates
Well, it is not that simple.
Having major plugins to have their own release means that
Indeed, you are correct Geertjan. I think we are on the same page. Thanks
for the proposal...looks great.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:47 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> The proposal is exactly as we are all arguing for — including Neil and
> Chris — a quarterly release cycle, though with two
I like the idea of two major releases each year...those being releases
incorporating new functionality. However, I think it would be a good idea
to have patch releases in-between...making for a total of four releases
each year.
Josh
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 7:19 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 22:17, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Maybe reducing the NetCat process or changing it?
OK, so in the interests of [DISCUSS] :-) I think Chris is right here.
I wasn't able to take part in NetCAT for NB10, but did for NB9, and
that process probably does need to adapt. We had a
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, 14:16 Emilian Bold Two releases per year seems more manageable.
>
The point of 4 was to be more manageable though. Less changes, less
pressure for new features to meet deadlines (dropping 3 months less of an
issue)
I'm happy with either, but I don't think the current
Two releases per year seems more manageable.
--emi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:19 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've completed the NetCAT process (on the functioning of the convenience
> binary of Apache NetBeans 10) and the PPMC vote (on the sources of Apache
> NetBeans 10).
>
>
Hi all,
We've completed the NetCAT process (on the functioning of the convenience
binary of Apache NetBeans 10) and the PPMC vote (on the sources of Apache
NetBeans 10).
Right now, the IPMC (the incubator project management committee) is voting
on the sources of Apache NetBeans 10, since Apache
16 matches
Mail list logo
