Done: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/180
Gj
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Great, thanks, will implement these insights.
>
> Gj
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think Matthias
Great, thanks, will implement these insights.
Gj
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Yes, I think Matthias is right, anything before the first %%TestCase should
> be ignored, so a license header there should be OK. (I guess it might make
> sense to place the header inside a Ja
Yes, I think Matthias is right, anything before the first %%TestCase should
be ignored, so a license header there should be OK. (I guess it might make
sense to place the header inside a Java comment as for Java files, but
shouldn't be necessary.)
For the two empty files under resources (one .hintm
Hi Geertjan,
Am Sonntag, den 22.10.2017, 20:27 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> I'm looking at the Rat report for the java.hints.declarative module -- and
> these are the ones identified as not having Apache licenses yet.
>
> In the below, there is one file with a ".hint" extension, which is em
