Hi all,
Reema has put the installers created from the installer sources in her pull
request on Apache NetBeans GitHub in her repo:
https://github.com/rtaneja1/incubator-netbeans/tree/installer-bin-11vc4/nbbuild/installer/binaries
She also has a process whereby the installers can be generated as
Hi,
I’m fine with adding this with a comment that those installer are not official.
One Issue here is, when I wanted to start the installer, Windows says again
this message: https://ibb.co/2Nr8Q43. This happened also for NetBeans > 9.
Until NetBeans 9, I didn’t have this Problem. So smth change
The smartscreen warning is mentioned in the Smartscreen wikipedia page,
under criticism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SmartScreen
*SmartScreen Filter creates a problem for small software vendors when they
distribute an updated version of installation or binary files over the
internet.
So signing is missing here, if I understand it correctly. Thx for the link Pete.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Pete Whelpton
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. April 2019 10:29
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Experimental installers for 11.0
The smartscreen warning is mentioned in the Sm
No worries :) My understanding (I'm 100% sure that this my understanding
is correct) is that digital signing weights the algorithm more in favour of
not displaying a warning, but the early adopters (first few people to
download) may still get the warning until a sufficient level of "trust" has
be
Yes sure, I only wanted to say, that smth changed/smth is missing from using
NetBeans > 9. So there where no problems with the old oracle NetBeans until 8.2
(Maybe they where signed correctly) and no problems with NetBeans 9. It started
happening with NetBeans 10. But to end my discussion, I wil
I can see the binary files are committed and pushed to a code branch on
github fork of NetBeans.
In my opinion this is an anti-pattern and binary files shall not be
committed to code repository (they add to the size of the repository).
Ideally all binaries coming out of build process shall be part
NetBeans 9 did not have installers at all...
Gj
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 11:08, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Yes sure, I only wanted to say, that smth changed/smth is missing from
> using NetBeans > 9. So there where no problems with the old oracle NetBeans
> until 8.2 (Maybe they where signed correctl
+1 link for now. Users! Users everywhere!
:-)
Wade
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 03:54 Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reema has put the installers created from the installer sources in her pull
> request on Apache NetBeans GitHub in her repo:
>
>
> https://github.com/rtaneja1/incubator-netbeans
>
> explicitly linking to the above on the page below so long as we clear
> state that these are not official Apache NetBeans installers, though that
> they should be seen as experimental installers for the next release:
>
> https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb110/nb110.html
>
> Do we agree with
Hi, I will not be merging this branch to master, it is pushed to my
fork only for hosting the binaries temporarily.
Thanks,
Reema
On 05/04/19 3:28 PM, Tushar Joshi wrote:
I can see the binary files are committed and pushed to a code branch on
github fork of NetBeans.
In my opinion this is a
Dear all,
I would like to thank you to be able to be the Release Manager of Apache
NetBeans 11.0!
Thank you all, who contributed in this release either by code,
documentation, advice, or shared opinion!
This cycle started a bit sleepy, either due to the new year's duties or
due to the exha
Thanks a lot for your great work, Laszlo!!!
Junichi
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:23 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to thank you to be able to be the Release Manager of Apache
> NetBeans 11.0!
>
> Thank you all, who contributed in this release either by code,
> documentation
Yes, fantastic work, thank you very much!
Gj
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:43 PM Junichi Yamamoto
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your great work, Laszlo!!!
>
> Junichi
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:23 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I would like to thank you to be able to be the Rel
OK, added info about the installers as a tip on the Download page:
https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb110/nb110.html
Gj
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:34 PM wrote:
> Hi, I will not be merging this branch to master, it is pushed to my
> fork only for hosting the binaries temporarily.
>
> Thanks
Thanks a lot for the release!!!
And ... maven artefacts are staging at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1013 for
people wanting them.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Antonio
Envoyé : jeudi 4 avril 2019 22:39
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.
Thank you very much Laszlo! Really appreciated!
P
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:44 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Yes, fantastic work, thank you very much!
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:43 PM Junichi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for your great work, Laszlo!!!
> >
> > Junichi
> >
> > O
On 4/5/19 7:51 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
OK, added info about the installers as a tip on the Download page:
https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb110/nb110.html
Should we also mention the Snap package for Linux users?
Apache NetBeans (incubating)
https://snapcraft.io/netbeans
It was real
Congrats all on the release, I installed it on my laptop and it's running
beautifully.
Great job, all!
David
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:03 AM Eric Barboni wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the release!!!
>
> And ... maven artefacts are staging at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
Yes and the difference there is that the Snap package is officially
supported by Apache NetBeans. Maybe if that screenshot of Apache NetBeans
10 can be changed to 11.0, then we should definitely add it to the
Downloads page.
Again great work by Laszlo by the way. :-)
Gj
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5
Hi,
I would notify that we have now Apache NetBeans (incubating) 11 maven
artefacts
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1013
and the 10 version here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1012
they are respectively build by Jen
Hi all,
Thanks, Laszlo, for this great work.
Regarding the release process [1], I think we could change steps 24 and 25.
What we have now:
24. Update the WebSite for the new Release
25. Send out release announcement-s
The proposal:
24. Prepare a PR with the website for the new Release and so
Hi all,
After the 11.0 release announcement, where we migrated most of
bits.netbeans.org, shall we tackle the plugins.netbeans.org website and
infrastructure for 12.0? Or is it too early? Also, what's missing in
netbeans.apache.org that still exists in netbeans.org and we want to keep?
I can
Here's the rough proposal:
1. Move all the plugins to Maven Central. Blockers: we don't know how to do
that, if someone can advise, that will help.
2. Refactor the plugins.netbeans.org application so that (1) NBM files
cannot be uploaded anymore and (2) instead of uploading, references need to
be
Getting back to this again. I guess I'd like to release this, based on the
current content of the repository. Basically, the release would be
artifacts like these:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-jackpot-release/17/
Any objections?
Thanks,
Jan
On T
Most important would be how to use this -- i.e., this is a CLI for Apache
NetBeans Java Hints. So, how to use it?
Gj
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Getting back to this again. I guess I'd like to release this, based on the
> current content of the repository. Basically, the
The readme:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-jackpot30/blob/master/cmdline/README.md
says:
---
Running
Run using:
$ jackpot
To get help on the options, run:
$ jackpot --help
---
(Note it only runs on JDK 11/12.)
Jan
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:19 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
Thanks for a fast reply. Some comments/ideas inlined below.
El 05/04/2019 a las 20:31, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:
Here's the rough proposal:
1. Move all the plugins to Maven Central. Blockers: we don't know how to do
that, if someone can advise, that will help.
A previous step would be defin
Very cool. Would be nice to see some complete example command lines.
Sure let’s vote and by the time the vote is done we could naybe skip IPMC
vote because we’ll be out or nearly out of the incubator.
Gj
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 21:34, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The readme:
>
> https://github.com/apach
I'm a newbie to the Netbeans community but this does sound reasonable to me.
I'm particularly interested because of the C/C++ plugin source.. And if I
can help with that one, I'm more than happy to put some effort into it.
-brad w.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:31 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Her
Hear, hear--thank you for the great work, Laszlo!
Maybe the "Update titlebar version" issue (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2111 for 11.0, with associated
pull request as an example) should also be added to the release process list at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBE
Hi,
Would not be easier to allow plug-in developers to register their
updates center "on the fly".
We would do a git repository on github.
There plug-in developer would add an xml file with a link, name, etc.,
to his update center via PR.
The approval process would remain preserved...
An
There has been recurring discussions about making NetBeans look better on HiDPI
(retina) screens. This is a large umbrella issue, touching all three major
operating systems (Windows, Linux, and MacOS), with many subtasks involved. I
have created a Confluence page which summarizes the current sta
There are over 3000 bitmap icon images in the NetBeans codebase. Probably at
least several hundred of these are frequently seen by everyday NetBeans users.
The page below shows all the unique "gif" or "png" files that existed in the
NetBeans mercurial repo prior to the Apache transition:
htps:/
Have noticed for some time that nb9, nb10, nb11 consider each version the
same when trying to run one instance of nb9, nb10, or nb11 at same time.
In other words.
when running nb9 cannot run nb10 or nb11
when running nb10 cannot run nb9 or nb11
when running nb11 cannot run nb9 or nb10;
For all p
Are you using the releases or something else like dev builds on your own?
It sounds like you are using the same user directory.
Wade
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 19:27 Gary Bello wrote:
> Have noticed for some time that nb9, nb10, nb11 consider each version the
> same when trying to run one instance o
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 19:27 Gary Bello wrote:
>
> Wondering where the source code that causes this behavior is located ?
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/master/nb/ide.launcher
Wade
Regarding the plugin developers to register their plugins easily. I will
propose the Homebrew model for registering plugins.
This means maintaining the list of plugins as files in a github
repository. This repository will be considered as the plugin registry. So
the plugin developers will just
Thank you Laszlo, for the job done very well. You have set a god example
for this process.
with regards
Tushar
Tushar Joshi, Nagpur: http://www.tusharjoshi.com
* MCSD_NET C#, SCJP, RHCE, ZCE, PMP, CSM, SAFe, PRINCE2
* Senior Architect @ Persistent Systems http://www.persistent.com
* Linked
You're looking at nearly a couple decades of work. I doubt anyone could
track down all names etc or even every single source. The best info would
come from the hg logs is my guess.
Wade
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 19:09 Eirik Bakke wrote:
> There are over 3000 bitmap icon images in the NetBeans codeba
I am using the incubator netbeans release versions.
each has etc/netbeans.conf configured with its own user dir, and cache dirs
- all different
i am running windows 10 64 bit,;
yes - i do build from source - but these were downloaded apache release
versions.
anyone with multiple versions of netb
Thanks for the location info.
When netbeans refused to start there is no popup or error msg seen.
It seems that any errors detected/reported by netbeans launcher do not
appear in the netbeans log,
ie S:\Sun\nb\userdir\9.0\var\log\messages.log
Anyone know if there is a logfile that can be examined
42 matches
Mail list logo
