Re: source grant and repo transfer

2016-10-07 Thread Jan Lahoda
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > > > On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:23, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > [snip] > >> b.) the repo size is about 3.6 GiB. That’s really huge. Devs would not > >> even be able to git-clone this over to their own

Re: The various Apache NetBeans (incubating) mailing lists

2016-10-07 Thread Wade Chandler
On Oct 7, 2016 8:39 AM, "Emilian Bold" wrote: > > > There is another thing also: the sentiment of belonging. > > This is a really good point Bruno. > > My point is that it's much simpler for contributors to join Apache. We just > use another mailing list, use another

Re: source grant and repo transfer

2016-10-07 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > ...I agree with you that we should preserve the history though Maybe create two repositories (or sets of): a historical one which stays read-only and has all the history, and a current one starting fresh from

Re: source grant and repo transfer

2016-10-07 Thread Emilian Bold
> a.) the repo contains binaries which are GPL licensed. That needs to get kicked out of the repo anyway. Could you give an example for this? Like, a revision I can look at? > b.) the repo size is about 3.6 GiB. That’s really huge. Devs would not even be able to git-clone this over to their own

Re: Wiki setup (was: The various Apache NetBeans (incubating) mailing lists)

2016-10-07 Thread Mark Struberg
We had some good experience with using asciidoc. That can be used as base for a web page but also get processed into a PDF or help pages. We only did this for much smaller projects so far though. LieGrue, strub > Am 07.10.2016 um 09:48 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga >

Re: source grant and repo transfer

2016-10-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Emilian! The problem with 2 is that it won’t work nicely. There are 2 problems as sketched. a.) the repo contains binaries which are GPL licensed. That needs to get kicked out of the repo anyway. > What is important is the legal clearance at > the moment the code grant happens. Yes, but

Re: The various Apache NetBeans (incubating) mailing lists

2016-10-07 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Yup. I think there needs to be a parallel solution like this. Gj On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Emilian Bold > wrote: > > ...if we > > only ask a lot of people will not notice this