Re: Clarity needed -- adjusting the license headers

Great, thanks. Could you also take a look at the thread entitled "Assembling LICENSE and NOTICE" -- i.e., we need a mentor's perspective here to make sure we're taking the right approach. Gj On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 2017-09-16 21:32, Craig Russell

Re: AW: Github issue tracker or Jira?

Sounds great and thanks for offering to help, great to see experienced NetBeans users popping up all over the place. Gj On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > I have been an enthusiast NetBeans use since version 3, if possible I would > like to

Re: Assembling LICENSE and NOTICE

Two things I don't understand right now, hope mentors can advise or someone who knows: 1. Is there any reason why we would not simply have one NOTICE and one LICENSE file, i.e., in the top level of incubator-netbeans. In other words, why and under what conditions would we want to have more than

Re: Portions Copyright 2005-2006 Andrei Badea

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, change it. > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 14:50, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > jumpto/

Re: Portions Copyright 2005-2006 Andrei Badea

Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I'll leave somebody from Oracle as Oracle employed afaik Andrei Badea. > >> > >> > >> --emi > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > >>

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

able to do the merges? Thanks, Gj On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > So, we should each do a fork and then create a branch from that fork for > each PR? > > If so, if possible could you update these instructi

Two module reviews in one PR

Hi all, I messed up a bit and have two different modules reviewed in the same PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/69 Is that a problem and can be something be done to fix it. Thanks, Gj

Re: Contributor(s): marki...@netbeans.org

Yes, change it. Gj On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 14:51, Emilian Bold wrote: > > jumpto/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/jumpto/common/HighlightingNameFormatterTest.java > has > > Copyright 2012 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. > > > but also > >

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

-netbeans? Thanks, Gj On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not a problem, you will get two commits when merged. > > --emi > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote

Re: Contributor(s): marki...@netbeans.org

body from > Oracle change that header. > > > --emi > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, change it. > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 14:51, Emilian Bold <e

Re: Using #Hacktoberfest for the modules review

38leinad has been given permission when you asked for it, you can edit the Wiki. Gj On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Provide your confluence id and I'll give you permissions to the Wiki. > > Gj > > On Fri

Re: hi all & request for confluence rights

You have permission, see above. 38leinad has permission. Gj On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Really awesome -- and done! > > Gj > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Daniel Platz <daniel.pl...@icloud.com>

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

com> wrote: > Hi, > > You need a new git branch for every PR. This is the thing I mentioned > always confuses people the other day. > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, 16:50 Geertjan Wielenga, < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrot

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

o the PRs remain in a limbo > state with the existing commits and you cannot change them ever. > > Just push --force into your broken branch and the PR will pick up the > updated commits. > > --emi > > Pe 6 oct. 2017, la 18:35, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@goo

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

If you have done a fork instead of a branch, how would this step above be done: git merge Thanks, Gj On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Matthias Bläsing <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote: > Hey Geertjan, > > Am Freitag, den 06.10.2017, 19:44 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielen

Re: Two module reviews in one PR

review-pr # Merge the working branch (we created it above) > git push > > Now your work is in upstream and now you can use the normal "branch" > and merge workflow. > > The difference to the hg (mercurial) workflow is, that the mercurial > workflow had now revi

Re: applemenu: applemenu-external-desktop-classes.zip Oracle dependency which is GPL w/ CPE + CDDL

> ;-) > > +1 ;-) > > > --emi > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Neil C Smith < > neilcsmith@googlemail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:33 AM Geertjan Wielenga < > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: &g

Re: applemenu: applemenu-external-desktop-classes.zip Oracle dependency which is GPL w/ CPE + CDDL

I think the CDDL approach could work. But what's stopping us from creating those files from scratch ourselves, under Apache? I.e., just because Oracle did not donate them does not mean we cannot create them ourselves, since they're simply stub classes? Gj On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:08 AM,

Re: Development version

Yes, I saw that -- reported it and it's being looked at. Note though that this is unrelated to Apache, i.e., if you want to use Apache NetBeans, use the Apache NetBeans GitHub repo: github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans Thanks, Gj On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Michael Müller <

New pattern for converter tool in javx files in apisupport.wizards

Hi all, Some files in apisupport.wizards, such as this one, have an Oracle license and a 'javx' file extension, and are templates used internally in NetBeans to generate files via the NetBeans Module wizards:

Binaries list for junitlib

Hi all, In the binaries list for junitlib, the following content is found: A6C32B40BF3D76ECA54E3C601E5D1470C86FCDFA junit-4.12-sources.jar 941A8BE4506C65F0A9001C08812FB7DA1E505E21 junit-4.12-javadoc.jar Both the hashes above are findable on Maven central. I just don't know how to refer to

Re: Binaries list for junitlib

Thanks, that's what I tried. I got this when I did the build, with that specifier: Expecting groupId:artifactId:version, but was junit:junit:4.12:sources in /Users/geertjanwielenga/main/incubator-netbeans/junitlib/external/binaries-list - Gj On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Antonio

Re: Binaries list for junitlib

> If you've already up to date with these changes and things still don't > work I'll suggest adding a test case & opening an issue. > > > > On 08/10/17 22:55, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> Thanks, that's what I tried. I got this when I did the build, with

New pattern for license converter tool

Hi all, Yesterday at JavaOne, some of us got together to work on the Modules Review and found a new pattern that needs to be handled in the converter tool. The pattern can be found in several hundred files, so we can clean these all up at the same time by twesking the tool for this. Here are

Re: New pattern for license converter tool

second comment, so the tool won't find it. > -the tool only looks for comments that begin in the first 100 characters > from the beginning (a safety feature, as a few files contain texts of the > license headers as patterns) > > I'll look at those. > > Jan > > > On W

Re: Editing permissions for making changes to the Wiki.

Done! And welcome! Gj On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Borxa Varela Bouzas wrote: > Hi, > > Would someone please add my confluence id " borxa " to the list of > people allowed to make changes to the list of modules to review at > [1]? > > Thanks, > Borxa > > [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5

Yes, one thing a lot of us are assuming is that everything must be perfect for it to be released. In Apache, that's not the case, but then the question becomes what the minimum requirement of the first release should be -- i.e., maybe all that needs to be done is updating license headers to

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2017

Yes, I filled it out based on all the various things that have happened. Didn't think of turning the report into a community thing, I think that's a great idea, we should I think try to do that next time. Gj On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 09:03, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5

Tried again and the build succeeds. When the problem occurs with the test, it seems like the build hangs, but when I click the terminal window the build continues, takes quite a long time, and after lots of things happening the build completes. Gj On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Geertjan

Re: How do I assign bug to myself?

Yes, will take a look, I think everyone who is a committer should be given the same rights. Gj On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 18:20, John McDonnell wrote: > Sorry for the double post, > > But looking at the Issue Permissions it seems only users with the > following

Re: Linking GitHub account to

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15271 Gj On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > OK, sounds like there are no objects -- and a lot of advantages -- to > using GitBox, so I'll request it (and looking forward to bein

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > > BTW, will all the issues at netbeans.org be migrated to JIRA? > There are various schools of thought on this question. We could move all issues over. Many of the issues are old or out of date or irrelevant, i.e.,

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Antonio wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 10:49, Peter Steele wrote: > >> The Apache integration should be very prominent on the main page, it >> should >> link to all the relevant Apache pages and should ask for volunteers etc. >> The Apache wiki is

Re: Linking GitHub account to

Or maybe we should vote on this as a community before going ahead with it? Gj On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15271 > > Gj > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11

Re: Linking GitHub account to

use I could not close it. > > Maybe gitbox could help there? > > Greetings > > Matthias > > > Am Samstag, den 14.10.2017, 14:46 +0200 schrieb Matthias Bläsing: > > Hey, > > > > Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 13:25 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: >

Re: Request for subscription to mailing list : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org

Welcome and details on how to register on the mailing list are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate Gj On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Vikas Prabhakar wrote: > Dear Team, > > This is Vikas Kumar Prabhakar. I have 7.5 years

Re: hi all & request for confluence rights

Really awesome -- and done! Gj On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Daniel Platz wrote: > Hi all, > My name is Daniel (username 38leinad) and i am a long-time Netbeans user > and now the move to apache seems to be the perfect time to get involved and > give back. > I would

Re: [VOTE] Build #19 as HTML/Java API release 1.5

+1 Gj On Monday, October 16, 2017, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Everybody please vote for HTML/Java API version 1.5 - thanks in advance for > confirming the bits work for you. You can find the ZIP, MD5 and SHA1 files > at >

Current Status of Apache NetBeans

Hi all, Many things going on right now and lots of progress: - We have around 2000 files left that need to be relicensed to Apache or handled in some way, out of 45000, really great progress. - We're setting up GitBox (please no merges until that is complete, could take another day or so) so

Re: Linking GitHub account to

submit many PRs this week, I’m afraid. > > Anyway I’d appreciate you telling us when this GitBox thingy is ready for > use. Instructions would be also appreciated. > > Thanks, > Antonio > > > El 16 oct 2017, a las 9:56, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlem

Re: Current Status of Apache NetBeans

n.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > NetBeans #Hacktoberfest has been pretty nice also so far. Got around > 17 new people committing to NetBeans. > > --emi > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, >

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Martin Dindoffer wrote: > Sure, I was just trying to explain myself, and also the opinions of others > around me. Of course Netbeans has many positives, otherwise I wouldn't use > it. But we need to take a sober realistic look at it if we

Re: Rat violations as test failures

Wow, excellent! Gj On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Hi team, > thanks to hard work of Eric Barboni we count the RAT violations as test > failures. See: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/ >

Re: Odd Sun Public License Notice chunk in test generator

https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/140 Hope it helps! Gj On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > OK, no worries at all, will do it. > > Gj > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Martin Dindoffer wrote: > > * Maven integration is bad. Compared to competition it is slow, the > periodic indexing is painful. The dependency graph generator is unusable on > large projects. > That's an interesting observation because

Re: Linking GitHub account to

OK, sounds like there are no objects -- and a lot of advantages -- to using GitBox, so I'll request it (and looking forward to being able to do merges from GitHub). Gj On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/11/2017 02:06 PM, Geertjan Wiele

Re: Who is asfgit?

org> wrote: > On 10/11/2017 12:28 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Someone appears to automatically (I guess a bot) be merging PRs after a > > couple of days of inactivity, i.e., if there are no comments etc, such as > > this one of mine: >

Re: Who is asfgit?

not be committing to master but to a development branch where someone reviews a PR before accepting it into master? Gj On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/11/2017 12:31 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > OK, so I did a PR (https://github.com/a

Linking GitHub account to

Hi all, I have permissions for Apache NetBeans Git -- how do I connect my GitHub account to those permissions so that I can do merges of pull requests? Or is that not possible and should merges be done to Git, with asfgit doing the sync from Git to GitHub? Thanks, Gj

Who is asfgit?

Hi all, Someone appears to automatically (I guess a bot) be merging PRs after a couple of days of inactivity, i.e., if there are no comments etc, such as this one of mine: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/103 Is that correct and what we want? I.e., nobody reviewed the above nor

Re: Linking GitHub account to

I think that would be handy -- are there any disadvantages? Gj On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/11/2017 02:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have permissions for Apache NetBeans Git -- how do I co

Re: Incubator NetBeans Build Test Cases Failures

Hi Arunava, Great that you're looking into this. >From my point of view, I'd prefer option 2 -- for exactly the reason you mention: if we keep them, someone can use them in the future. Really looking forward to seeing the tests succeed -- excluding those that fail, because of the reason you

Re: Linking GitHub account to

now no credit card required. It’s you guys that are the > rockstars. I just pay for the beers! > > Abrazos, > Antonio > > > > El 16 oct 2017, a las 21:42, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> escribió: > > > > https://www.apach

Re: Linking GitHub account to

So, where do I > get one of those? Will that require a credit card? > > Thanks :-) > Antonio > > > > El 16 oct 2017, a las 21:33, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> escribió: > > > > Yes -- instructions and tracking the issue can be done

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > - netbeans.org is totally void of any Apache information, if you want more > people involved then communication should be updated there. > Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re Apache? I

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Javier Ortiz wrote: > > If NetBeans was unique there would be more help since there were no other > options. But if your time is limited and not available or buggy on NetBeans > you just look around and there are other options. > >

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Vieiro > wrote: > > ...Should NetBeans support Apache Spark? Tomcat? The Go programming > > language? R? Whatever? Just find a big pool of

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > ➢ Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re > Apache? > ➢ I can see it already myself, it's been there for months -- but where > would > ➢ you like to see it, where are you looking and not

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > Yeah they started and then they cancled it. The go plugins, are far away > of usable. I talked to the devs, because you can see no source Code in the > plugin Portal. One Project is at github now, the other one,

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net> > wrote: > >> ➢ Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re >&g

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Antonio <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 10:19, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> >> OK, will work on the main page, to add that info more explicitly -- do we >> have a central page at Apache we should point to fro

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > The Apache integration should be very prominent on the main page, it should > link to all the relevant Apache pages and should ask for volunteers etc. > The Apache wiki is ok, but most people know about netbeans.org. >

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

PS: See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/on+top+of+NetBeans for a list, this is the updated version, with more info being added, of https://platform.netbeans.org/screenshots.html. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Antonio wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 09:49,

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > >Have you tried this plugin: > >plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/62424/darcula-laf-for-netbeans > > > >Would be great to have that as part of Apache NetBeans. > > I use this, it's definitely the best look and feel that you

Re: [Mentors] Access to Jenkins. Can I get one?

I believe you'll need to create an Infra request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa Gj On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Hi. > I'd like to set a continuous build for Apache HTML/Java API from the >

Current status of 1st NetBeans code donation to Apache

Hi all, Quite some progress has been made since the release of the 1st NetBeans software grant to Apache. Jarda and Jan have taken two of the three repos that are part of the 1st code donation and pushed them to Apache Git, mirrored at these GitHub locations:

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

longer has > access to Oracle's key for signing. Someone "fixed" this by changing the > build to not sign the installer. > > -Alvin > > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > Not sure

Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

see >> messages above. >> >> >> On 11-09-17 17:12, Simon IJskes wrote: >> >>> I'm missing a README or something with the build instructions. >>> >>> G. Simon >>> >>> On 11-09-17 17:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: >>> >>

Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

s+Transition+Process Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yes, README and much more must be added. > > -- Build it: ant build -Dcluster.config=java in the root of the sources > -- Try it: ant tryme in the root of the sou

Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

Would be great to do some sanity checks, e.g., does it build, if not why not, and somebody should try to check it out and do a quick recursive diff with the unzipped donation ZIP file to make sure all files are there. Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wi

NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

Hi all, Big milestone -- git://git.apache.org/incubator-netbeans.git https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans The main repo from the 1st code donation has landed in Apache Git, mirrored at Apache GitHub. Thanks all, especially Petr Gebauer, for doing the push, and thanks also for the

Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

The sooner the better. :-) Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Simon IJskes <si...@ijskes.org> wrote: > When can we start contributing patches? > > G. Simon > > > On 11-09-17 17:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> Yes, README and much more must be ad

Re: 1st code donation is complete

en Apache NetBeans is ready to accept contributions. > > > Peter > > > > > > > On Monday, September 11, 2017 8:40 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > Great, thanks a lot. > > Gj > > > On Mon,

Re: 1st code donation is complete

, others can build it. > > > > Regards, Raphael > > > > > > Am .08.2017, 09:38 Uhr, schrieb Geertjan Wielenga < > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>: > > > > By the way, this is the same repository that you and others successfully > >>

Re: 1st code donation is complete

sful build i see: > > > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > Total time: 3 minutes 6 seconds > > > > > > > > On 11-09-17 18:19, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > > >> I see this problem still when building, of course we have not fixed this > >> at

Re: [Mentors] NetBeans (main) job on Jenkins

netbeans-html4j is already there: https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j/ Yarda created an issue then went to the infra hipchat and it was done really fast. Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Simon IJskes wrote: > On 11-09-17 18:15, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > it

Re: 1st code donation is complete

Ah, now it works. The JS file is downloaded thanks to the binaries-list entry, during the build. Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I see this problem still when building, of course we have not fixed this > a

Re: 1st code donation is complete

BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 3 minutes 6 seconds > > > > On 11-09-17 18:19, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I see this problem still when building, of course we have not fixed this >> at >> this point. But the fix above does not work for me, so I cannot build.

Re: 1st code donation is complete

Great, thanks a lot. Gj On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Both done. For building simple "ant" should now suffice. > > Jan > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com&

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

Not sure about the reminder part -- can you point to an issue that you're referring to here and a way to reproduce or somehow reproduce this? Gj On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Alvin Thompson wrote: > I figure I'd write an annoying reminder that currently the

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > netbeans-jackpot30.git;a=commit;h=ddcdd3d6e2c523e1db7a292867fe9619eff6b92b > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > netbeans-jackpot30.git;a=commit;h=9ed0a3779e5ab9860c2126a9377da9b1b7aaa335 > &g

Re: (Main) NetBeans source to Apache

Hi mentors et al, We're following the advice of caution -- and waiting to hear whether/when the push of the 'netbeans' repo can be done. There appear to be varying perspectives on how cautious we should be and also varying perspectives on how clean the ZIP file and the grant itself is. Whatever

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

daily builds are still working on the original site and > are producing builds, which seem to have differences between them: > > > > http://bits.netbeans.org/download/trunk/nightly/latest/ < > http://bits.netbeans.org/download/trunk/nightly/latest/> > > > >

Re: [Show and tell] What the NetBeans Platform is good for

Excellent. Gj On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > This kind of tooling: YaMeter - Yet Another Load Testing Tool with more > Cloud > > https://vimeo.com/233443690 > > --emi >

Re: Clarity needed -- adjusting the license headers

>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Geertjan Wielenga >>> <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Just checking to make 100% sure -- "adjust the license headers -- Which >>> this should be done by a

Re: Github issue tracker or Jira?

Yes, this is a good question and I was waiting for someone to bring it up. Hoping others can advise here -- after all there are hundreds of Apache projects, so this is one of those questions that have been thought about and handled hundreds of times. Gj On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Christian

Re: [Mentors] Towards release of HTML/Java API

I wonder whether it works like that or whether, since that repo is part of the Apache NetBeans project, it needs to graduate as part of Apache NetBeans. I.e., there is no Apache HTML4J project -- there is instead an html4j repo that is part of the Apache NetBeans project. But my interpretation

Re: [Mentors] Access to Jenkins. Can I get one?

Re Travis and Apache: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci Gj On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>: 08.09.17 @ 15:12 > <

Re: Commit bit

I'd discuss anything you're planning to commit before committing, especially in the current state where I think we're mainly focusing on relicensing and getting an incubator release out there ASAP, but in principle it should be the same as working with any Git repo:

Adjusting the license headers

Hi all, The very first step we now need to take, i.e., now that NetBeans has landed in Apache Git, is the adjusting of the license headers to Apache. This is a task that has to be done by an Oracle representing committer. Here is the issue where this is being tracked:

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

:19 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Sorry, Attila, this is not how Apache works. In Apache, everyone is equal > and anyone only becomes a committer when they prove their value to a > project. > > Gj > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

The good news is, we’re all nice > people and graciously change our opinions when presented with better > information. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >

Re: Adding Apache Rat to NetBeans build

Sounds like there's no objections, can't imagine why there would be objections, let's do it. Gj On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 at 16:01, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@oracle.com> wrote: > On úterý 12. září 2017 13:56:27 CEST Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > I think that would be great -- ge

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

It seems not. That's what Ate said and then reversed on that. Gj On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote: > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Attila Kelemen > >

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

Sorry, Attila, this is not how Apache works. In Apache, everyone is equal and anyone only becomes a committer when they prove their value to a project. Gj On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Attila Kelemen wrote: > I understand your concern but I wanted to point out

Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git

av did for the -html4j repository. > > Regards, > Ate (who regrettably has very limited time this week to monitor anything > going on here) > > > On 2017-09-11 17:04, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Big milestone -- >> >> git://git.apache.org/i

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

olvement in that task, which gives them enough > merit to > >> be committers. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Michael > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >

Re: Voting in 3 Oracle devs from the CCLA as committers

To Apache, the people in the project, i.e., the community, is more important than the code. The project constitutes people plus code. The project as a whole has been in incubation, even without the code. Gj On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 at 16:39, Emilian Bold wrote: > This makes

Re: Adding Apache Rat to NetBeans build

Looking forward to typing 'ant rat' on the command line, to build NetBeans and produce Rat output... Gj On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 at 19:06, Emilian Bold wrote: > I didn't find Rat a very flexible tool when I looked into it. > > I wouldn't want it to run for every build. > >

Re: Closing/Switch read-only hg.netbeans.org

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > I believe it's not possible to close main/ since development is still > ongoing for the stuff that wasn't donated. > Yes. > > The way I see it, until everything is donated development will happen > in parallel but

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >