>
>
> Do the sources of the installers matter, at all? What they are is a
> convenience binary, which is outside the scope of what Apache releases in
> the same way as a ZIP file.
>
>
For RCP based applications it sure does.
>
> 1. Is this too late for inclusion in our official release? They haven't
> been tried out as part of the NetCAT process, so should we wait to include
> these not in the upcoming release, but in the release afterwards?
>
As the PR has not been merged, this piece of code hasn't been voted on yet.
+1
>
>
> To help us out of this situation and save Java as a programming language I
> dedicated my days to smoothing out interoperability between Java and
> JavaScript with the goal to reuse the most flexible and portable rendering
> system of these days: the browser. My work has already been donated
+1
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <
> jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (informational)
> >
> > >> Geertjan Wielenga : 13.11.17 @
> 22:01
> > <<
> > > https:
+1
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Anton Epple
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am 13.11.17, 11:35 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" >:
> >
> > Last 12h to cast your vote...
> > -jt
> >
> >
+1
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think that's right. I've re-run the job, specifying the version. The
> updated artefacts are:
> source:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>
>
>
> things might get lost that are important without us realising,
> particularly in channels other than #general. Whether the solution is
> logging or another similar service with better archiving, I don't
> know. I do think it's a communication medium that ends up being used
> in a way that's