Is anyone having issues running this build?
I can build, however, when I try to run the above on commit in on my on a
JamaicaVM running on ThreadX but I am getting the following error:
org.junit.runners.model.TestTimedOutException: test timed out after 2
milliseconds
at java.io.FileI
I'm +1 for this as a release.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Tony,
>
> With regards to the error, I have seen this on heavily taxed systems. The
> Travis jobs I have set up against my fork suffer with these from time to
> time, presumably when that service is burdened (or
Regarding my Fedora Core 23 and nifi-framework-core
4th time is a charm. Killed some other processes on the box, test finished
in 19 seconds.
(Not sure if this is the same as NIFI-1145, which looks very similar)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> Well, I've run into 2 known bug
Tony,
With regards to the error, I have seen this on heavily taxed systems. The
Travis jobs I have set up against my fork suffer with these from time to
time, presumably when that service is burdened (or whatever allotment it is
that Apache has negotiated with that platform).
This pertains to NIF
Well, I've run into 2 known bugs that are environment problems (must have
java in path when building and DISPLAY being set with no X server), and a
GetHTTP that timed out, but worked on retry..
Ubuntu 14.04 (no issues) built and run with java 1.8 (u65) and java 1.7
(u79)
Centos 6.7 (no issues) bui
Bob,
The error indicates that there were files in the queue. This is as
expected in terms of how connections are handled as these connections are
the queues that hold the actual FlowFiles as they progress through their
flow. A FlowFIle "passes through" a processor as it moves from one
connection
Verified Keys and Hashes.
I've got a Fedora 23, CentOS 6.7 and Ubuntu 14.04 (all x86_64) and Windows
10 (64 bit) build all going simultaneously now. Should cover the problem
children from last RC. So happy TestJdbcHugeStream is faster.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Foll
Followed helper provided by Joe.
Keys good.
Signatures good.
Hashes good.
Source release builds and passes contrib on both OS X 10.10.5, Oracle Java
1.8.0u60, Maven 3.3.9 & Win 7 Pro, Oracle Java 1.8.0u51, Maven 3.3.3
Required docs present and look correct.
Checked out copy of repo for specified c
Oh, wonderful!
NIFI will be the golden bridge over the data lake!
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:07:16 -0700
From: ml-node+s39713n5599...@n7.nabble.com
To: bob.zhao.w...@live.com
Subject: Re: PutSQL : feature enhancement - PutPropertyToSQL
Bob
Please don’t feel like your question about Hive
+1 (binding)
- ran through joe's helper and all looked good
- tested some sample flows and functioned as expected
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Ricky Saltzer wrote:
> +1
>
> build works
> test works
> hashes/keys check out
> tested a couple simple workflows
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:57 PM,
Hello,
I build a working flow for testing. After finish the test, I decide to
remove some conditional branches in *RouteOnAttribute* processor, so I just
delete some property rows inside the processor. Then when I close the
processor window and try to delete the according relations which linked t
+1
build works
test works
hashes/keys check out
tested a couple simple workflows
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Joe Percivall <
joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Ran through the helper: validated keys, built binaries on Windows and Mac,
> ran some templates.
> Everything worked as expect
Ran through the helper: validated keys, built binaries on Windows and Mac, ran
some templates.
Everything worked as expected.
+1 Release this package as Apache NiFi 0.4.0. - - - - - - Joseph
Percivalllinkedin.com/in/Percivalle: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 3:29 PM,
I ran through Joe’s helper procedure:
Signatures, digests, etc. look good. Source downloaded and built (with tests
successful) and started successfully. Tried importing, instantiating, and
running templates. Added, configured, and deleted processors. Looks good to me
:)
+1 (non-binding)
On
All,
This helper still applies for RC2.
Thanks
Joe
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Joe Percivall
wrote:
> I actually had a problem unzipping this package on Windows. I tried unzipping
> in my Downloads folder and it gave me a "Path Too Long" error. Both the
> built-in Windows extractor and W
Hello NiFi Community,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache
NiFi 0.4.0.
The source zip, including signatures, digests, and associated
convenience binaries can be found at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.4.0/
The staged maven artifacts of the b
Jeff,
Please be sure you're on latest master and manually delete those
target dirs (as root) once more. I had a bug in that test last night.
But it should now be fixed. the issue was that it made a file,
changed its perms to be something we cannot delete, then moves on.
Second pass, it will fail
I created a nifi user on my VM, moved the /root/nifi folder to / and changed
the owner of /nifi to nifi:nifi recursively
I executed mvn -e -X -T 2.0C clean install as the nifi user
Below is the error;
Downloaded:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/yammer/metrics/metrics-ganglia/2.2.0/metrics-g
Hello,
The directory property should only need the path in HDFS. The other stuff
like the file system, host, and port would be determined from the provided
configuration files.
Do you receive any different response if you set the directory to just
"/root" (or some other path)?
If you still recei
Hi Team,
I have been exploring NiFi for couple of days now.
NiFi is running on a machine which is not a part of Hadoop cluster. I want
to put files into HDFS (On my machine I have configured the hortonworks
sandbox by using virtual machine ). As to writ into HDFS I have created the
process PUTH
I think Joe's perspective maps more closely to what Andre was searching for
in terms of a knowing when a consumer can be notified/guaranteed of
successful handoff of data in the overall flow process. Primarily, the key
factor is that this mechanism provides at least once delivery in that the
unit o
At the high level we try not to copy anything unless we have to, so when you
say “under NiFi care” it becomes a bit unclear. For example, one may be copying
a file using zero-copy algorithm. Let’s assume that NiFi was the facilitator of
that process. With that said, the data is/was never under N
Andre,
Excellent. Glad to hear you're making progress. NiFi is said to be
under control of data once a FlowFile with its content has been
generated in a ProcessSession and that session has been committed.
A more detailed overview of this part of the process is here
https://nifi.apache.org/docs/
All,
Still working on the lumberjack processor. Data is currently being decoded,
SSL is sort of working but before I start wrapping up I wanted to confirm:
Lumberjack is a protocol that includes the dispatch of an acknowledgement
message to the producing agent.
As consequence, usually a producer
24 matches
Mail list logo
