Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/21#discussion_r69371933
--- Diff:
minifi-toolkit/minifi-toolkit-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/toolkit/configuration/ConfigMain.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,342
ddewaele,
> 2. Sometimes, when syncing files to my S3 buckets, I notice that the ListS3
> processor is picking up the same file twice. Is there a way to avoid that ?
Joe's response is correct. If you upload an object to S3 that
overwrites an existing key, the modified date will change, and
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
Can you put your template in a Gist? I'll give it a try too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
Were there quotes (single or double) in the real flow's value?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
I cherry-picked in the commits that added unit tests, to show that they
would fail without your fix, however they pass. Any idea how the tests differ
from the error that spawned the Jira?
---
If
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
I also added Apache Commons Email to NOTICE
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
@joewitt According to to
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.subethamail/subethasmtp/3.1.7
The only dependencies should be
Ok team I put in a request for 'issues@nifi.a.o' and updated
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12191# to reflect our
plans. Will now edit the website to document the purpose of each
list.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Joe Skora wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue,
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69357651
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
An example could be another test just like that one with cql.args.10.value
set to "I'm not a timestamp" or a timestamp not in ISO-8601 format like
"07.01.2016". Not saying the operation should
Github user jeffoxenberg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
No problem. I think I added a test for a good value here:
`https://github.com/jeffoxenberg/nifi/commit/335e4f08a60989909d2d152f426fa5d46dec9a1b`.
Could you give me an example of writing
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69355562
--- Diff:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/597
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/603
@mcgilman excellent - all looks good, as far as I can tell. This PR
addresses several issues that existed in the application. I've pushed to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69353249
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r6935
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/21#discussion_r69352051
--- Diff:
minifi-toolkit/minifi-toolkit-configuration/src/test/resources/Splunk_Processors_with_Listen_TCP.xml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69351172
--- Diff:
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/21#discussion_r69346935
--- Diff:
minifi-toolkit/minifi-toolkit-configuration/src/test/resources/Splunk_Processors_with_Listen_TCP.xml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69346410
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
Looks good, mind adding unit test(s) to try various good and bad values?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/603
NIFI-1781: Updating UI to respect access controls outside of canvas
- Updating UI according to permissions through out the application.
- Shuffling provenance events, template, and cluster search
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/21#discussion_r69342080
--- Diff:
minifi-toolkit/minifi-toolkit-configuration/src/test/resources/Splunk_Processors_with_Listen_TCP.xml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+
GitHub user jeffoxenberg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/602
NIFI-2165: fix support for inserting timestamps into cassandra
As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2165, fixing support for
inserting timestamps into Cassandra.
You can merge this
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/593
@mcgilman good call. Looks good to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/593
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/593
@markap14 Looks great! I made one additional change to populate snippet
results off of the actual components instead of just the snippet contents
(since the contents are now pruned).
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/601
NIFI-2039: Provide a new ProcessSession.read() method that provides an
InputStream instead of using a callback
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69325929
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-processors/pom.xml
---
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ language governing permissions and
Github user JPercivall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576
It would be nice to have integration tests similar to those in the original
Fetch/PutElasticSearch processors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69324539
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69323436
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69320973
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69320860
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69320695
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-processors/pom.xml
---
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ language governing permissions and
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69320414
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319929
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319909
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319708
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319637
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319591
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319479
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69319085
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69318800
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69318859
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69318837
--- Diff:
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69318666
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-processors/pom.xml
---
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ language governing permissions and
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69318008
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69317662
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69317330
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69317281
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69317035
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69316350
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69314307
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69313807
--- Diff:
GitHub user ijokarumawak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/600
NIFI-906: Make NiFi docs responsible
- Switched from absolute layout to responsible using flex-box.
- Added toggle switch to control component listing pane visibility.
- Tested with
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69313182
--- Diff:
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69312668
--- Diff:
Richard,
NiFi allows you to configure how many threads are executing at the same time.
This is configured
by right-clicking on the processor and going to the "Scheduling" tab. You can
choose the number of
concurrent tasks. If that is set to 1, then only one FlowFile will be processed
at a
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/576#discussion_r69306232
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-processors/pom.xml
---
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ language governing permissions and
So my guess here is that the controller service or processor or whatever it is
that was created was the one
that logged "Shutting down server" as one of its lifecycle methods, but the
Mock Processor Logger has a bug
where instead of logging the toString() of the Processor or Controller Service
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
@ijokarumawak thanks for the gist.
Interesting that junit missed that and I incorrectly assumed the change in
structure had not lead to side effects. Feedback was much appreciated and
unless
Joe
Personally I probably need to look at it more thoroughly to have an intelligent
answer, but one thing I know for sure (or at least I believe. . .) is that if
you see any of these Mock* references in the log when you starting NiFi
instance it’s definitely a bug.
If that is what you see,
Mark and Oleg, thanks, it makes sense now.
But, I'm still trying to track down how we have logs containing "... INFO
[Finalizer] o.a.n.d.mock.MockProcessorLogger Shutting down server". It
still doesn't seem like that should occur.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Oleg Zhurakousky <
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
@trixpan Thanks for addressing comments promptly! I confirmed that all of
my comments are addressed. However the modification on ExtractEmailHeader.java
didn't work with following error:
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483#discussion_r69261278
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/ExtractEmailHeaders.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,234
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483#discussion_r69260944
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/ExtractEmailAttachments.java
---
@@ -0,0
67 matches
Mail list logo