As a possible work around, there were date functions added to record path
in 1.5.0, so if you had a schema that treated the field as a string, you
could reformat the column in place using UpdateRecord to get it into
whatever format it needs to be in.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:17 PM Koji Kawamura
Hi Derek,
By looking at the code briefly, I guess you are using ValidateRecord
processor with CSVReader and AvroWriter..
As you pointed out, it seems DataTypeUtils.isCompatibleDataType does
not use the date format user defined at CSVReader.
Is it possible for you to share followings for us to
I have a question about the expected behavior of convertSimpleIfPossible in
CSVRecordReader.java (NiFi 1.5.0).
I have a custom CSV file that I am taking to an avro schema using
ValidateRecord. The schema contains a logical date type and the CSV has
the date in the format MM/DD/. I expected
In order to use Provenance to view details of a flow file, a user must
belong to the 'view the data' policy for a given component(s) along the
flow. For example, the lineage graph will show "UNKNOWN" for any component
which the user does not possess 'view the data'. Not only can the user not
I completely second Mike's sentiment here as well as cautionary
statements by other contributors over this thread's history (Matt
Burgess' post in particular). Besides fueling flame wars and religious
inquisition, you cannot open the door to Scala without opening it to
other (JVM languages at
Milan,
I don't think you can do that without creating a lot of fuel for a flame
war. I have personally never met a Scala developer who was incapable of
writing decent Java. The same is true of Groovy. I think anyone who finds
the requirement to use Java over their language of choice to be a deal
I think we should not add blindly any language but should be open to add couple
of language like Scala.
In Bigdata world Scala/Python/Java are widely accepted.
Thanks,
Milan Das
Interset
On 2/13/18, 10:20 AM, "Weiss, Adam" wrote:
I think it makes the most
I think it makes the most sense to me for us to publish a separate repo with a
module and nar build for now and post when it's available in the users group.
Thanks for the discussion everyone, hopefully we can start making some helpful
contributions soon.
-Adam
On 2018/02/10 23:43:31, Tony