Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

Correction 7 +1 (binding) votes 7 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 votes On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:57 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Apache NiFi Community, > > I am pleased to announce that the 1.11.3 release of Apache NiFi passes with > 6 +1 (binding) votes > 6 +1

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that the 1.11.3 release of Apache NiFi passes with 6 +1 (binding) votes 6 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 votes Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. Here is the PMC vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 binding On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:36 PM Andrew Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -Ran full clean install on OS X (Catalina 10.15.2) > -Tested secure NiFi with secure NiFi Registry > -Tested TLS Toolkit new default cert validity days [1] > -Ran basic flows successfully > -Reviewed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 (non-binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (Catalina 10.15.2) -Tested secure NiFi with secure NiFi Registry -Tested TLS Toolkit new default cert validity days [1] -Ran basic flows successfully -Reviewed documentation updates Drew [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7082

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 (non-binding) Verified checksums, signatures, and commit hash Ran build and all tests on OpenJDK 1.8.0_242 on Linux and OS X Created clusters on VMs and docker and ran flows -joey On Feb 24, 2020, 11:33 AM -0800, Matt Gilman , wrote: > +1 binding > > Ran through release validation steps.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 binding Ran through release validation steps. Looks great! Thanks for RMing Joe! On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:21 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.11.3. > > The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 (binding) Ran through the release helper guide steps. Ran the resulting binary and tested NiFi Registry integration. Thanks for RM'ing, Joe! Kevin On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:52 PM Marton Szasz wrote: > > +1 non-binding > Ran through release verification checklist, tested with a simple >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 non-binding Ran through release verification checklist, tested with a simple TailFile->LogAttribute flow. Marton On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 17:45, Pierre Villard wrote: > > +1 binding > > Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and let it > run for 24h with a scenario

Re: [DISCUSS] Advanced search capabilities

FWIW, having spent a lot of time in the last year working with graph database ingestion, I really don't see this story ending well for replacing Lucene. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 5:01 PM Otto Fowler wrote: > +1 for the “bring your own golden hammer” approach > > > > > On February 24, 2020 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Advanced search capabilities

+1 for the “bring your own golden hammer” approach On February 24, 2020 at 11:46:14, Mike Thomsen (mikerthom...@gmail.com) wrote: Another thing I forgot to throw out there was that you have an issue of latency if you use Janus or Neo4j. Lucene will almost certainly have substantially lower

Re: [DISCUSS] Advanced search capabilities

Another thing I forgot to throw out there was that you have an issue of latency if you use Janus or Neo4j. Lucene will almost certainly have substantially lower latency for updating and querying the provenance data if you were to do a bake off between the two to power a provenance repository.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 binding Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and let it run for 24h with a scenario where the leak should have been observed. All LGTM. Thanks Joe for taking care of the release. Pierre Le lun. 24 févr. 2020 à 05:30, Robert Fellows a écrit : > +1 (non-binding) >

Re: Jira contributor access

Hi Roberto! I've added you to the contributor role for all projects within NiFi. Welcome and we look forward to working with you! --aldrin On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:03 AM Roberto Marturano < marturano.robe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I’d like to start to contribute to NiFi. I’ve some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.3

+1 (non-binding) Ran through the release checklist, verified signature and hashes. Built with OpenJDK 11.0.4 (Zulu) Ran a few basic flows Quick check of parameter functionality Looks Good, Thanks for RM'ing Joe! - Rob On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:10 AM Chad Zobrisky wrote: > +1 non-binding. >

Jira contributor access

Dear all, I’d like to start to contribute to NiFi. I’ve some changes to propose and I’d like to get contributor access to JIRA. My username in Jira is: rmarturano Thank you very much, Best regards Roberto Marturano

Re: Benchmark and Timer driven vs. Event driven

Hi Mike, thank you for your reply! I think I need to clarify my intention. I think NiFi is a very good product and I am also aware of the positive aspects beside performance, that you mentioned! It is just the difference between event vs. timer driven scheduling und the future plans about this.

Re: [DISCUSS] Advanced search capabilities

Hi, Thanks for your approval! I created a ticket for that. For now, containing the proposal. Later I will update it as I go on, I hope that is okay with you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7188 As this is not the only thing on my