Ashar,
You are not subscribed to the mailing list so you are not seeing replies. I
replied to you last Thursday stating that there is no support for basic
authentication for Apache NiFi.
Andy LoPresto
alopre...@apache.org
alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
He/Him
PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D
Hello team,
I just wanted to follow up on my previous request.
Regards,
Ashar
From: Ashar Azmat
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 2:57 PM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Cc: Wesley Philip
Subject: Nifi Authentication
Hello team,
Hope this email finds you well. We had a
Please use a separate thread for discussion. This is purely voting.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:38 AM wrote:
> Is it possible to document the NiFi properties that were removed in the
> release notes or an "upgrading to …” page. As an administrator it is
> difficult to know which properties shoul
Is it possible to document the NiFi properties that were removed in the release
notes or an "upgrading to …” page. As an administrator it is difficult to know
which properties should removed during our upgrade process.
--
Richard St. John, PhD
Asymmetrik
AGILITY | EXPERIENCE | RESULTS
308 Senti
+1 (non-binding)
Compile and ran with Amazon Correttto Java 8 on OSX. I had an issue getting
site-to-site to work between NiFi 1.11.4 and NiFi 1.12.0 in RAW mode
(non-secure) and had to switch to using HTTP. The message on the Remote
Process Group read “Remote instance is not configured to al
+1 (non-binding)
- verified checksums and signatures
- built source (empty local maven repo, Java 8 and 11 on Linux), start up
the binary
- untar and ran the convenience binary, tested ADLS processors and other
simple flows
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
+1 (binding) tested it with one of our client's flows and worked beautifully.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:06 AM Tony Kurc wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified checksums and signature. No issues building or running. Did not
> see any issues with LICENSE or NOTICE.
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 5:07 AM P
+1 (binding)
Verified checksums and signature. No issues building or running. Did not
see any issues with LICENSE or NOTICE.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 5:07 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and tried a
> few flows. Confirmed
+1 (binding)
Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and tried a
few flows. Confirmed some fixes, tested the ScriptedTransformRecord
processor, and the new flowfile concurrency features.
Thanks all for this great release, a lot of really good stuff!
Thanks Joe for taking c
