I'm not sure, but if this processor is included, probably the NiFi LICENSE
file has to be updated with something like this:
https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/LICENSE#L229
--
Javi Roman
Twitter: @javiromanrh
GitHub: github.com/javiroman
Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
Big
Likewise - thanks! Will be good to see this come back into core so they
can grow together. This along with the work happening for stateless nifi
will offer a lot of choices for users to use the most appropriate engine
for their use case while building flows against consistent flow
+1 to all of this - I'm really looking forward to seeing more of this!
Le lun. 16 nov. 2020 à 18:39, Kevin Doran a écrit :
> Thanks for your attention and effort on this, Matt. I look forward to the
> discuss threads, but at a high level, this sounds like a good and important
> step for MiNiFi
Thanks for your attention and effort on this, Matt. I look forward to the
discuss threads, but at a high level, this sounds like a good and important
step for MiNiFi Java and C2.
Cheers,
Kevin
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 12:28, Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As you know, MiNiFi Java is a
All,
As you know, MiNiFi Java is a separate project and codebase than NiFi,
it's my understanding that this was done because MiNiFi Java was a
fledgling effort while NiFi was an established project, and trying to
do rapid development and releases on MiNiFi would cause some
interference with NiFi
