Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.26.0 (RC1)

- Processor change history on property hover Thank you Pierre and team for 1.26.0! Nissim Shiman On Friday, May 3, 2024 at 12:47:45 PM UTC, Pierre Villard wrote: Team, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi 1.26.0. Please review the following guide

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M2 (RC4)

with component that migrates properties, controller service reference is invalid NIFI-12666 Correct NiFi Registry Data Source Configuration Thank you David and team for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 02:30:45 AM UTC, David Handermann wrote: Team, I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M2 (RC2)

or 2.0.0 M1 to this RC as well (i.e. the registry starts up, but doesn't see any of the buckets/versioned flows) Thanks, Nissim Shiman                      On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 10:35:34 AM EST, David Handermann wrote: Team, I am pleased to be calling this vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M1 (RC5)

for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 10:40:25 PM UTC, David Handermann wrote: Team, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M1. Please review the following guide for how to verify a release candidate build: https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M1 (RC5)

Nissim Shiman wrote: > >  Team, > > > I'm having difficulty migrating from registry 1.22.0 or earlier to 2.0.0-M1.  > This was not seen on when moving to 1.24.0 (RC3). > > > i.e. Migrating registry from 1.23.2 to 2.0.0-M1 or 1.24.0 (RC3) works fine. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 2.0.0-M1 (RC5)

t(FileStore.java:916)        at org.h2.mvstore.MVStore.(MVStore.java:289)        at org.h2.mvstore.MVStore$Builder.open(MVStore.java:2035)        at org.h2.mvstore.db.Store.(Store.java:133)        ... 136 common frames omitted Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 10:40:25 PM U

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.24.0 (RC3)

when PG was copied from a version controlled PG Thank you Pierre and team for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 08:10:20 PM UTC, Dan S wrote: +1 (non-binding)   - Went through the Release Candidate Verification   <https://cwiki.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.23.0 (RC3)

/browse/NIFI-11872 Verified these issues where in existance in prior releases as well.   Not blockers. Thank you David and team for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 03:57:25 PM UTC, Ferenc Kis wrote: +1 (non-binding) Went through the helper guide, full

dynamic properties not recovering from ghost component state

as is.  It is not so common to have components in ghost state, and only some of them allow Dynamic Properties so this is an acceptable risk considering the alternatives. I am interested in community feedback and/or other suggestions to the current situation.  Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.22.0 (RC1)

is not a blocker. Also, noticed that MonitorMemory has difficulty running when scheduled as a cron.Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11661Also not a blocker. Thank you for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 09:38:43 PM UTC, Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I am

Re: [discuss] nifi 1.22 looking worthy at this point

d. > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11560 > > Thanks, > -- Mike > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:13 PM Nissim Shiman > wrote: > > >  Joe and team, > > > > Thank you for the coming release. > > I am hoping someone can review/com

Re: [discuss] nifi 1.22 looking worthy at this point

and mosermw for previous recent reviews/merging of tickets I was working on)  Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 12:57:42 PM EDT, David Handermann wrote: Joe, Thanks for initiating the discussion, I agree that the number of bug fixes, dependency upgrades, and other

request for ticket review

Hello apache nifi committers, Could someone review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10756 StandardSSLContextService will fail silently on nifi restart if keystore no longer exists I would very much appreciate it. Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.21.0 (RC2)

(in Controller Service Details's Settings tab) are sometimes not working.  Made NIFI-11389 for this.  Not a blocker. Thank you for upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:11:38 AM UTC, Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.20.0 (RC1)

.  nifi screen looses look and feel when this occurs and displays  OutOfMemoryError Put in a jira for this  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11153 This would be a very limited user initiated edge case, so I don't think this is a blocker. Thank you for the upcoming release! Nissim

Re: request for review, NIFI-10608

descriptor)  I would greatly appreciate that as well. Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 01:40:40 PM EST, Nissim Shiman wrote: Hello apache devs, Could someone review/merge: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10608 Copied Processor Group no longer

request for review, NIFI-10608

, Nissim Shiman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.19.0 (RC1)

guess from before nifi 1.16) this might be noticed. Will put in a jira for this edge case. Thank you for the upcoming release! Nissim Shiman On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 03:58:27 PM UTC, Joe Witt wrote: Hello, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache

Re: copied PG not containing controller service from the original?

Joe, Sorry for the previous brevity, but for example: create new PG -> right click -> Configure -> Controller Sevices -> Add any controller service (AvroReader for example) copy PG new PG -> right click -> Configure -> Controller Services -> (new controller service will be not listed/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.18.0 (RC4)

+1 (non-binding) verified source release sha256/512 checksums  built and ran successfully using:Apache Maven 3.6.3 Java openjdk version: 1.8.0_332 linux kernel 3.10.0-1160 verified out of the box simple invokeHTTP to ListenHTTP flow put  simple invokeHTTP to ListenHTTP flow in process

Re: request for ticket review

Hello apache nifi devs, Resending request ... in hopes of still making 1.18  Thanks, Nissim On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 03:52:49 PM EDT, Nissim Shiman wrote: Hello apache nifi committers, Could you look at two bug fixes:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9878

request for ticket review

for python These have relatively modest amount of code changes and have already been reviewed. Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Load Distribution Service nar location

Hello nifi devs, Are we aware of a location for an implementation of the Load Distribution Service api [1] ? This is used in the DistributeLoad processor [2], but is not found when chosen.  I searched the nifi code for an implementation and there doesn't appear to be one.  Maybe it is in a

Re: request to commit reviewed PR - adding bulletin level control to Controller Services

Hello Apache NiFi team, Resending below email with request to review/commit  PR: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6035 It already has a review with +1, but is waiting on a committer to look at it. Thanks, Nissim On Thursday, May 19, 2022, 02:55:40 PM EDT, Nissim Shiman wrote

request to commit reviewed PR - adding bulletin level control to Controller Services

users to have finer control over bulletin levels (i.e. settings of NONE, DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR) just like processors currently allow.  I think this functionality will be useful for many nifi users. This has already been reviewed. Thanks, Nissim Shiman

turning off bulletins for controller services

Hello NiFi devs, Do we know if there is way to turn off bulletins for controller services? Processors have Bulletin level configurable on the "Settings" tabs, but it is not clear there is similar functionality exposed for controller services Thanks, Nissim

"Active Threads" different on status bar then "Active Thread Count" when listed by nodes

ve Thread Count" is more comprehensive and includes has other threads as well (i.e. reporting tasks etc.) Is this correct?  And do we know the various other sources that nifi threads can come from besides processors that "Active Thread Count" captures? Thanks, Nissim Shiman   

ListenHTTP - filters http headers but not flowfile attributes

eaders (when dealing with non-FFv3 data) as well as incoming attributes (when dealing with FFv3 data)  Thank You, Nissim Shiman

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache NiFi 1.13.0

NIFI-7738 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738 (Provenance Search Events - add feature to allow inverse query) has had PR updated based on comments. It would be very much appreciated if this could make it into 1.13.0 as well Thanks, Nissim On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 01:58:30

Re: request to merge PRs to main

. Also, thank you Mark Payne for merging NIFI-7225 and commenting on NIFI-7738! Thank You, Nissim Shiman On Monday, December 28, 2020, 12:25:25 PM EST, Nissim Shiman wrote: Hello apache nifi devs, I have thoroughly reviewed and tested PRs for 2 bug related tickets (both on java 8

request to merge PRs to main

that has been reviewed and tested by another contributer as well. So no additional reviewing/testing needs to be done by a PMC/committer as they have been vetted. Could someone commit these to main? Thank You! Nissim Shiman

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache NiFi 1.13.0

Hello Nifi Team, NIFI-7738 [1]  https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4563  has already been reviewed/tested by a fellow contributer I would greatly appreciate a committer moving this to main for 1.13.0 Thanks, Nissim Shiman [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738 On Sunday

Re: FILE_EXISTS_VALIDATOR allows directories as well, is this a feature or a bug?

validator that checks for the existence of a folder > >and that it is a folder, not a file. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Mike > > > >On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:06 PM Nissim Shiman > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Nifi devs, > >> It has

FILE_EXISTS_VALIDATOR allows directories as well, is this a feature or a bug?

/nifi-commons/nifi-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/util/StandardValidators.java#L505[2]   https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/main/nifi-commons/nifi-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/util/StandardValidators.java#L851-L852 Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

noticed this conversation and has already reviewed my PR and has made some useful comments.  So we are already seeing results.  (and thank you Mark!) I plan to start reviewing/testing PRs. Thank You, Nissim Shiman On Thursday, October 8, 2020, 12:17:13 PM EDT, Joe Witt wrote: Hello Anyone

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

Second attempt... Hello NiFi team, Could someone respond to this email. Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Monday, October 5, 2020, 11:01:57 AM EDT, Nissim Shiman wrote: Hello NiFi team, Could someone review the pull request for NIFI-7738 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738

request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

epostories) and VolatileProvenanceRepository.java The rest are just involved in propagating the ability to query the "NOT" option for a given user entered provenance search value from the gui to the backend query. Thank You, Nissim Shiman

potential new feature - inverse Provenance queries

e user is indicating to do an inverse query for the value entered.) I put together a proof of concept and it works without any obvious complexity or gotcha issues. What do you think about this? Thank You, Nissim Shiman [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/main/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-p

can contributers review PRs?

. This way the final merge is still done by a committer, but the review step has already been handled. Thanks, Nissim SHiman

onPropertyModified() is triggered on Processors and Controller Services, even when properties are the defaults, bug or feature?

/ConfigurableComponent.java#L68 Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Re: [discuss] Apache NiFi 1.11.0

Could someone look at merging in NIFI-6851 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6851 Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Monday, January 6, 2020, 12:06:06 PM EST, Joe Witt wrote: Team, We've already seen a good stream of nice fixes, improvements, and some minor features land on NIFi

jira contributer access request

Hello Apache Nifi team, I would like to request jira contributer access to apache nifi.  I would like to work ticket NIFI-6851. My jira username is:Nissim Shiman Thanks, Nissim Shiman

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

ay, November 4, 2019, 12:50:11 PM EST, Nissim Shiman wrote: Having an attribute added indicating passive/active/query for RECEIVE and FETCH will work,  but nifi attributes are stateful (i.e. they will still be on the flowfile as metadata a couple of processor steps down the flow) Maybe an

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

Nissim Shiman wrote: >  Mike, > I like the QUERY type as well.  Basically a more refined PULL.  Very nice. > > > Part of the challenge of adding PULL as a type is that there are currently > two flavors of RECEIVEs. > RECEIVE and FETCH [1] > > So any addition of a PULL

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

- Go looking for the data and take what matches your search. Ex. JsonQueryElasticsearch, GetMongo, any SQL query processor, etc. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:31 PM Nissim Shiman wrote: >  Joe, > > > It is hard to say how much value transit URI would bring to clarify a > RECEIVE

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

here that is all opt-in for existing users and components. Thanks On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Nissim Shiman wrote: >  Adam, > good points... > I missed a step in explaining the use case where Provenance Events is > incomplete... > Where the second nifi does a GetSFTP from th

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/HandleHttpResponse.java#L191 On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:47 PM Nissim Shiman wrote: >  Adam, > I believe there is a need for more detailed ProvenanceEvents. > A use case wou

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

wever even more important to realize, this change would affect many other downstream consumers of provenance data which aren't necessarily in the stock NiFi distribution." Thanks, Nissim On Friday, October 11, 2019, 11:30:19 AM EDT, Nissim Shiman wrote: Adam, "Yes" to yo

Re: PULL ProvenanceEvent

trong vision to help demonstrate the value for this vs. the cost of the cascading effects related to this change. Thanks, Adam On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:02 PM Nissim Shiman wrote: > Hello Team, > > The ProvenanceEventType class does a good job capturing possible events, > but the PULL even

PULL ProvenanceEvent

capture the event. Thanks, Nissim Shiman