Re: [DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

Great – looks like a good consensus from the positive response. I'll send a vote soon to formalize a decision. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:06 PM Joe Witt wrote: > I'd be +1 and thanks for explaining. > > Just using a descriptive name and keeping the concept open for various >

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

I'd be +1 and thanks for explaining. Just using a descriptive name and keeping the concept open for various design systems to be leveraged is a good approach and doesn't require us to change anything later. Doing this now before a first release is a big win as well. Also didn't realize these

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

Makes complete sense to me +1 On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Matt Burgess wrote: > Makes sense to me, I'm a +1 as well. > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Scott Aslan > wrote: > > Good timing as we're close to ready for a first nifi-fds

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

Makes sense to me, I'm a +1 as well. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Scott Aslan wrote: > Good timing as we're close to ready for a first nifi-fds release. > > I would definitely favor us keeping the 'nifi-fds' naming as that means I > dont have to change a bunch of code

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

Good timing as we're close to ready for a first nifi-fds release. I would definitely favor us keeping the 'nifi-fds' naming as that means I dont have to change a bunch of code so Apache NiFi Flow Design System does that just fine. I will take care of updating the readme and other areas we need to

[DISCUSS] Change Apache NiFi Fluid Design System naming

I think it's important to highlight that for nifi-fds the 'f' part of the name was for 'fluid.' This is part of a FLUID product design system [1] to which I also contribute, that at the time was an internal concept, but is now being described in a public manner. However, nifi-fds is partially