Regarding OpenLDAP Public License
This does not appear to be listed under the approved apache licenses
to use for source or binary dependencies. However, it looks like it
is probably considered a variant of the BSD 3-Clause license which
would be ok as category a. It would be helpful to
Daniel,
I think one reason that MiNiFi Java has been successful, both as a prototype
and tool deployed in real environments today, is that it was able to leverage
much of the existing NiFi Java codebase. This greatly reduced the
"time-to-market” and allowed the development team to get working
For me personally, I don't see a value add of MiNiFi Java. The needs that
NiFi can't address MiNiFi Java can't either, so my focus is MiNiFi C++ as
that is the hole that needs fixing, again in my opinion, so that is where my
MiNiFi focus is going to be.
As I go through things I am sure I will
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for mailing and getting involved with MiNiFi!
There is no inherent coupling of versions rather, as has been the custom
within the NiFi community, we use, roughly, semantic versioning. As a
result, our initial release of MiNiFi C++ started as 0.0.1 and since there
have been
Having been out of touch since MiNiFi C++ got added and just getting into it,
is there a reason the C++ version is trying to follow closely the MiNiFi
Java version rather than just insuring connectivity with NiFi? I have not
been able to find alot of details regarding the roadmap for MiNiFi C++.
Hey folks,
There have been some nice improvements increasing stability and another
step toward framework parity with its Java counterparts. There was also
work done to update build tooling to provide a better foundation to tackle
specific environments and flexibility in generating differing
