gt; > >
> > > > > > > > Could we get this small PR merged (reviews appear to be
> done)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3723
> > > > > > > >
> > > &
all PR merged (reviews appear to be done)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3723
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> >
>
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:55 AM koter...@yahoo-corp.jp <
> > > > > > koter...@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Pierre,
> > > > > > &
koter...@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Pierre,
> > > > > > Thanks for your quick reviews!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Kotaro Terada
> >
t; > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:55 AM koter...@yahoo-corp.jp <
> > > > koter...@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Pierre,
> > > > > Thanks for your quick reviews!
> > > > >
> > > >
gt; >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kotaro Terada
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 差出人: Pierre Villard
> > > > 送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
> > > > 宛先: dev@nifi.apache.org
> > >
; > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kotaro Terada
> > >
> > > ________________
> > > 差出人: Pierre Villard
> > > 送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
> > > 宛先: dev@nifi.apache.org
> > > 件名: Re: [discuss] appr
er...@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pierre,
> > Thanks for your quick reviews!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kotaro Terada
> >
> >
> > 差出人: Pierre Villard
> > 送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
> > 宛先: de
s,
> Kotaro Terada
>
>
> 差出人: Pierre Villard
> 送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
> 宛先: dev@nifi.apache.org
> 件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
>
> Thanks Koji, I went ahead and squashed/merged the PR into master, thanks!
>
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for your quick reviews!
Regards,
Kotaro Terada
差出人: Pierre Villard
送信日時: Thursday, October 3, 2019 6:40:29 PM
宛先: dev@nifi.apache.org
件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
Thanks Koji, I went ahead and squashed/merged the PR
handle
> them before the 1.10 release, if possible.
>
> Best regards,
> Kotaro Terada
>
>
> 差出人: Koji Kawamura
> 送信日時: 2019年10月3日 9:04
> 宛先: dev
> 件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> The PR3394 l
them, please? I think it's better to handle them
before the 1.10 release, if possible.
Best regards,
Kotaro Terada
差出人: Koji Kawamura
送信日時: 2019年10月3日 9:04
宛先: dev
件名: Re: [discuss] approaching a NiFi 1.10.0 release
Hi Pierre,
The PR3394 looks good, but is
Hi Pierre,
The PR3394 looks good, but is hard to merge to master without manually
resolving conflict, at least with the commands I know. Please see my
comment on the PR.
Thanks,
Koji
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:59 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
>
> Someone willing to merge https://github.com/apache/nifi
Someone willing to merge https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3394? It's
been reviewed, just wanted to avoid merging my own PR.
Le mer. 2 oct. 2019 à 18:44, Jeff a écrit :
> Joe,
>
> NIFI-6275 [1] has been resolved, and PR 3483 [2] has been merged to master.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira
Joe,
NIFI-6275 [1] has been resolved, and PR 3483 [2] has been merged to master.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6275
[2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:30 AM Jeff wrote:
> Thanks Joe! I should have an update/resolution for NIFI-6275 tomorrow
Thanks Joe! I should have an update/resolution for NIFI-6275 tomorrow.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:48 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Team,
>
> We are pretty much there now it looks like for a 1.10.0. In scanning
> through this thread it looks like the ListHDFS ask from Jeff is perhaps the
> only remainin
Team,
We are pretty much there now it looks like for a 1.10.0. In scanning
through this thread it looks like the ListHDFS ask from Jeff is perhaps the
only remaining bit.
I'll probably create the RC branch soon so folks can keep moving on master
and I'll try to pull in other things that look rea
+1 for getting a 1.10.0 release soon - a lot of great things has been added.
If I may ask, it would be great to have a +1 from a committer on NIFI-6159
[1].
The PR has been reviewed by turcsanyip but it would need a final go from a
committer.
However, I do understand that other PRs mentioned in th
I'd also like to get the PR [1] for NIFI-6275 merged before 1.10.0 is
released. It's an update to ListHDFS so that the scheme and authority are
ignored when using the "Full Path" filter mode.
[1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 PM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> I c
I created NIFI-6604 [1] to reduce assembly size and listed it as a Blocker
for this release. The issue has a link to the associated discussion thread
and an initial PR.
--aldrin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6604
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:08 PM Matt Burgess wrote:
> Mike,
>
>
There is a critical issue with RAW Site-to-Site server side code with Java 11.
RAW Site-to-Site cannot be used currently due to the illegal blocking
mode error.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5952
There is a PR to make RAW S2S not using blocking mode. This addresses
the issue and RAW S
Mike,
I’ll review those two graph PRs tonight or tomorrow (if they’re still open by
then)
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 3:43 PM, Mike Thomsen wrote:
>
> I have two open graph-related PR's that are really small and are needed to
> close some bugs that will be bad for early adopters:
>
> https://github
I have two open graph-related PR's that are really small and are needed to
close some bugs that will be bad for early adopters:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3571
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3572
If someone wants to review, that'd be great. Otherwise, I can merge them in
because I'm
We had another discuss on that recently and the intent is to drop a few
toys off the raft and update migration guidance.
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jeremy Dyer wrote:
> +1 looking forward to this.
>
> I recall seeing some issues about Apache Infra and the binary size. Were
> all of
+1 looking forward to this.
I recall seeing some issues about Apache Infra and the binary size. Were
all of those appropriate modules removed as discussed and the build size
will be small enough now?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:35 PM Bryan Bende wrote:
> +1 Looking forward to getting parameters a
+1 Looking forward to getting parameters and Java 11 support out there
in a release.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:02 PM Joe Witt wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> It looks like we're reaching a point in which it is time to close in on
> 1.10.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6595?jql=project%20%3D%
Team,
It looks like we're reaching a point in which it is time to close in on
1.10.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6595?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.10.0
There are 250+ issues in there nearly 240 of which are already resolved. I
haven't gone through yet for
27 matches
Mail list logo
