, 2019 10:02 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
I discovered what appears to be a bug while compiling on Windows.
Line 46 of NiFiGroovyTest.groovy should be
private static final String TEST_RES_PATH =
Paths.get
eks
Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2019 9:07 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
I've created Pull Request https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3462 for this
change. I'm still doing some testing and it might not actually work right but I
wan
and I'll implement it.
Thanks
Shawn Weeks
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Bende
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 7:05 PM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
Should be available through the existing scan methods, they take a
ResultHandler
ow to get the
> timestamp on fetch. That will probably require a change or new scan method.
>
> Thanks
> Shawn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Bende
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 4:29 PM
> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for At
at everything I had another question. Why is the cache
> > > currently using a scan instead of a get to fetch values from HBase. It
> > > seems like that would be much less performant considering we know the row
> > > key we're looking for.
> > >
> &g
; }
> > }
> >
> > If the atomic guarantee for the original checkAndPut is good enough then
> > there is no reason I can't implement the atomic map cache for both versions
> > of HBase.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shawn
> >
> > -Orig
As I was looking at everything I had another question. Why is the cache
> > currently using a scan instead of a get to fetch values from HBase. It
> > seems like that would be much less performant considering we know the row
> > key we're looking for.
> >
> >
> >
for both versions of HBase.
Thanks
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Bende
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 12:39 PM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
I'm not totally if would matter if there were changes in between, as long
; Thanks
> Shawn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Bende
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 11:56 AM
> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
>
> Can it not be done with the existing checkAndPut method? [1]
&
we're
looking for.
Thanks
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Bende
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 11:56 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
Can it not be done with the existing checkAndPut method? [1]
I think if you use
Thursday, April 25, 2019 9:11 AM
> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support for AtomicDistributedMapCacheClient
>
> I'm not aware of a JIRA, so I'd say go for it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:27 PM Shawn Weeks wrote:
> >
> > Seems like this should be fa
it doesn't provide a
way to filter on timestamp which is part of how I was going to implement the
revision requirement for AtomicMapCache.
Thanks
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Bende
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 9:11 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding HBase Support
I'm not aware of a JIRA, so I'd say go for it.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:27 PM Shawn Weeks wrote:
>
> Seems like this should be fairly easy for HBase 2.x with the checkAndMutate
> functionality and I was wondering if there is already a Jira for this.
> Otherwise I might make an attempt at it.
Seems like this should be fairly easy for HBase 2.x with the checkAndMutate
functionality and I was wondering if there is already a Jira for this.
Otherwise I might make an attempt at it. It would be good to be able to support
Wait/Notify and other things that need
14 matches
Mail list logo
