+1 binding
Edward,
If you could provide some additional details in a new thread, that would be
helpful. As stated, the primary purpose of the proposed goals is to reduce
technical debt without introducing too many breaking changes. Depending on
the components in question, there may be
+1 (non-binding)
Nathan Gough ezt írta (időpont: 2022. dec. 14., Sze,
20:46):
> +1 (binding)
>
> The proposal sounds great to me
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, 1:01 PM Edward Armes wrote:
>
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Im not sure if this is covered by 8 and 5 , but I would like to suggest
> >
+1 (binding)
The proposal sounds great to me
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, 1:01 PM Edward Armes wrote:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> Im not sure if this is covered by 8 and 5 , but I would like to suggest
> that as part of 2.0 focus on removing places were concrete implementations
> are used over
-1 (non-binding)
Im not sure if this is covered by 8 and 5 , but I would like to suggest
that as part of 2.0 focus on removing places were concrete implementations
are used over interfaces, and update the way the website docs are generated
to ensure that NARs that not included in the standard
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:10 AM Mike Thomsen
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 9:33 AM Mark Bean wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
> > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Team,
> > >
> > >
+1 binding
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 9:33 AM Mark Bean wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> > recent discussion
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 7:45 AM Tony Kurc wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 12:02 PM David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> > recent discussion
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 12:02 PM David Handermann
wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8 support
+1 binding
Le mar. 13 déc. 2022 à 12:32, Marton Szasz a écrit :
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 09:04, Ferenc Erdei
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > On 2022. Dec 12., at 18:02, David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Team,
> > >
> > >
+1 (binding)
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 09:04, Ferenc Erdei wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On 2022. Dec 12., at 18:02, David Handermann
> > wrote:
> >
> > Team,
> >
> > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> > recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this
+1 (non-binding)
> On 2022. Dec 12., at 18:02, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (non-binding)
> On 2022. Dec 12., at 18:02, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (non-binding)
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 6:02 PM, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java
+1 (binding)
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 12:02 PM, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (non-binding)
David Handermann schrieb am Mo., 12. Dez.
2022, 18:02:
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (non-binding)
> On 2022. Dec 12., at 18:02, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann
wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (binding)
On Dec 12, 2022 at 12:41:16, Matt Gilman wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
>
> recent discussion thread [2],
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 6:42 PM Matt Gilman wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> > recent discussion
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann <
exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi
+1 (binding)
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 12:02 PM, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
>
> 1. Remove Java 8
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:27 PM Chris Sampson
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> ---
> Chris Sampson
> IT Consultant
> chris.samp...@naimuri.com
>
>
> > On 12 Dec 2022, at 17:02, David Handermann
> > wrote:
> >
> > Team,
> >
> > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
---
Chris Sampson
IT Consultant
chris.samp...@naimuri.com
> On 12 Dec 2022, at 17:02, David Handermann
> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt
+1 binding
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:02 AM David Handermann <
exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the
> recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following
> as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0:
25 matches
Mail list logo
