Mike/Mark,
Thanks for the responses! Given the background and current state, I'd vote
to mark as deprecated too. If in agreement, I'll create the ticket for
further discussion/planning.
Mike, that's a great point around IO vs CPU driven tasking buckets. With
some of the modern reactive
Joe,
Mike is right in that it was intended to be a more efficient scheduling
strategy. With Timer-Driven,
the processors used to constantly be checking if they had work to do and if not
would switch contexts
and check again. And again. This was pretty expensive, so we added the
Event-Driven
Hi Joe,
I'm guessing here, but I think the Event Driven scheduling was intended to
be more efficient than Timer Driven scheduling, in the way that push
notifications should be more efficient than polling. In practice, I'm not
sure anyone has measured the difference.
I have seen folks use Event
Hey everyone,
The dataflow I'm running has one main flow and a couple other disjoint
process groups. Within that main flow, there are sections which aren't used
very often. In trying to optimize things, I looked into the guidance we
have on the "event-driven" scheduling type. There doesn't appear
