As a former Pentaho employee, I can add some details around this:
- Pentaho does/did have a fork of Apache VFS. Mostly it was the
application of bugs in the 2.x line against the 1.x codebase. Since
then they have contributed fixes from their branch back to the 2.x
fork, and when I left they were
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/475
- Add Maven profile to compile nifi-hadoop-libraries-nar using MapR jars
* Create a Maven profile to allow users to chose to use MapR
Hadoop-compatible JARs
when building NiFi.
Hey all,
The pentaho-hdfs-vfs artifact is in the process of being deprecated and
superceded by vfs providers in their big data plugin.
They wouldn't be sufficient for outside use either way as they depend on the
big data plugin, Kettle, and the correct shim (see Matt's comment) to work.
A
Bryan, Matt
Thanks for the input, much appreciated.
Perhaps then the simplest option may be giving the user the option to
compile against one particular vendor, while ensuring the project build
points to the Apache licensed code.
This way the user is given the following choices:
User primary
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/290#discussion_r65119862
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-lumberjack-bundle/nifi-lumberjack-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/lumberjack/ListenLumberjack.java
---
@@
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#issuecomment-222580134
This as it was replaced by [Pull Request
478](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/478).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/477
NIFI-1663: Add ConvertAvroToORC processor
There is a test template here:
https://gist.github.com/mattyb149/3644803e8e0642346cf02b89ef62b411
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/478
NIFI-1754 Rollback log messages should include the flowfile filename â¦
â¦and UUID to assist in flow management. Incorporates debug logging into
StandardProcessSession.rollback() to list Flowfile
Github user apiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/290#issuecomment-222586092
Hey @trixpan,
Scoped out your new changes and left a couple comments. Changes look good,
just had a question on whether the SSL Context should be made required and
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/290#discussion_r65120353
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-lumberjack-bundle/nifi-lumberjack-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/lumberjack/ListenLumberjack.java
---
@@
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471#discussion_r65096361
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
---
@@
Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471#issuecomment-222539446
Other changes look good! Will merge to master.
During my testing of a 1.x template in an 0.x instance I discovered a
separate issue that the templates from an
Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/424#issuecomment-222531466
@YolandaMDavis I'm having some issues saving the JSON specification in the
Custom UI while running in a clustered instance. When I click save, the value
for the
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471#discussion_r65095238
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
---
@@
Github user jtstorck commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471#discussion_r65096222
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
---
@@
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471#discussion_r65097776
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
---
@@
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/471
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
18 matches
Mail list logo
