Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/9#discussion_r59962066
--- Diff:
minifi-nar-bundles/minifi-framework-bundle/minifi-framework/minifi-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/configuration/RestChangeNotifier.java
I vote for Jetty unless it is used for a web application with many user
sessions.
On Saturday, 16 April 2016 12:00 PM, apiri wrote:
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/9#discussion_r59961984
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/9#discussion_r59961984
--- Diff:
minifi-nar-bundles/minifi-framework-bundle/minifi-framework/minifi-runtime/pom.xml
---
@@ -40,6 +40,24 @@ limitations under the License.
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10#discussion_r59961712
--- Diff:
minifi-nar-bundles/minifi-framework-bundle/minifi-framework/minifi-resources/src/main/resources/conf/bootstrap.conf
---
@@ -28,6 +28,16 @@
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10#discussion_r59961376
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/configuration/FileChangeNotifier.java
---
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ protected boolean
+1 (non-binding)
Overall, the build worked as expected on my Windows 7 desktop. I went
through the release guide and things looked good. NiFi starts up from the
convenience binary and works as expected.
Output from mvn -version infoon my Win7 desktop:
Apache Maven 3.3.9
Hello Russell,
The annotation you are looking for is @DynamicProperties[1] an example of it in
use is in the PutFTP processor[2].
[1]
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/e4b7e47836edf47042973e604005058c28eed23b/nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/annotation/behavior/DynamicProperties.java
What's the syntax for defining more than one dynamic property for a
processor? I need to specify up to three distinctly different ones and
attempting to do it all in
@DynamicProperty(
name = "{blah,blah2,blah3}",
value = "{\"blah-value\",\"blah2-value\",\"blah3-value\"}",
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59952289
--- Diff:
minifi-nar-bundles/minifi-framework-bundle/minifi-framework/minifi-resources/src/main/resources/conf/config.yml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+#
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59950579
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/util/ConfigTransformer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,566 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59950322
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/util/ConfigTransformer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,566 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/359
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user markap14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/359#issuecomment-210618998
Looks like the latest commit addresses both issues outlined above. Will
merge into master.
Thanks for knocking this out!
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10#discussion_r59930579
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/RunMiNiFi.java
---
@@ -567,6 +586,104 @@ public void dump(final File
Github user markap14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/359#issuecomment-210612644
Looks good. I verified that I was able to start NiFi using both secure and
non-secure ports. I was then able to verify that I was able to add each
component, update it,
Github user mcgilman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/356#issuecomment-210607175
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59926348
--- Diff: minifi-bootstrap/pom.xml ---
@@ -45,5 +45,16 @@ limitations under the License.
org.apache.nifi
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10#discussion_r59926319
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/RunMiNiFi.java
---
@@ -567,6 +586,104 @@ public void dump(final File dumpFile)
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10#discussion_r59926141
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/RunMiNiFi.java
---
@@ -567,6 +586,104 @@ public void dump(final File
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59925817
--- Diff:
minifi-nar-bundles/minifi-framework-bundle/minifi-framework/minifi-resources/src/main/resources/conf/config.yml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+#
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59924347
--- Diff: minifi-bootstrap/pom.xml ---
@@ -45,5 +45,16 @@ limitations under the License.
org.apache.nifi
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59923164
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/util/ConfigTransformer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,566 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/359
NIFI-1551: Prepare for introduction of Authorizer usage
- Removing the AuthorityProvider.
- Refactoring REST API in preparation for introduction of the Authorizer.
- Updating UI accordingly.
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59922487
--- Diff:
minifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/bootstrap/util/ConfigTransformer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,566 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59921795
--- Diff: minifi-bootstrap/pom.xml ---
@@ -45,5 +45,16 @@ limitations under the License.
org.apache.nifi
Mark,Joe,
I’d spotted the ‘correlation attribute’ and I’d set that to a uuid relating to
the incoming request, that much is fine. The problem I had was how the set
things up so that MergeContent knows when it has got all the files. The options
seemed to be batch size or time related, neither
Thanks for the explanation, Mark. I feel much better :-)
Chris
On 4/15/16, 2:31 PM, "Mark Payne" wrote:
>Chris,
>
>The INFO level message here is ZooKeeper's way of indicating that you are not
>configured
>to use Kerberized connections when communicating with the
Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/8#discussion_r59920842
--- Diff: minifi-bootstrap/pom.xml ---
@@ -45,5 +45,16 @@ limitations under the License.
org.apache.nifi
Chris,
The INFO level message here is ZooKeeper's way of indicating that you are not
configured
to use Kerberized connections when communicating with the ZooKeeper Server. If
you are
aware of that, then it is no issue. While it indicates that it is an unknown
error, it is not something
that
GitHub user apiri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/10
MINIFI-14 Incorporating Listener/Notifier Logic
Incorporating Listener/Notifier logic to RunMiNiFi and performing some
refactoring of how the FileChangeNotifier is handled.
You can merge this
Just to build on what Joe said - the correlation attribute can be used to
ensure that FlowFiles
are bunched together appropriately. So you could, for instance, create an
attribute named "batch.id"
and set it as UUID. So if you perform a query against your database, you can
generate a new UUID
Richard,
MergeContent supports a concept called 'correlation attribute' which
will merge things together based on a matching correlation attribute
value. That might be useful for your case.
Regarding heap use you are observing i'd be happy to work through that
more with you.
Thanks
Joe
On
Hi Mark,
Thanks for pointer, I’d not spotted I was losing my provenance information. I’d
changed my code from transferring the temporary FlowFiles to a relationship
that was auto-terminated to using session.remove() and had assumed that the
provenance report was the same. I’ve just tested it
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/321#discussion_r59908921
--- Diff: nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/TestRunner.java ---
@@ -865,4 +866,21 @@
* @return the State Manager that is used to store and
Richard,
So the order of the children may be important for some people. It certainly is
reasonable to care
about the order in which the children were created.
The larger concern, though, would be that if we moved to a Set such as HashSet,
the difference
in the amount of heap consumed is pretty
Hi,
I’m trying to track down a performance problem that I’ve spotted with a custom
NiFi processor that I’ve written. When triggered by an incoming FlowFile, the
processor loads many (up to about 500,000) records from a database and produces
an output file in a custom format. I’m trying to
Hmm, I am not sure I follow completely.
You’ve described the approach you followed (i assume successfully) to create a
NAR. Are you asking if you should follow the same approach for creating another
NAR?
Cheers
Oleg
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:16 AM, idioma wrote:
>
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/331
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Oleg,
thanks for your reply. No, in this case it is not strictly related to my
first processor so I felt myself it should go in a separate NAR. I am
probably still unsure on how to generate it. For my first one, I have
created an empty folder and then run mvn archetype:generate, then after
filling
40 matches
Mail list logo