We should definitely encourage review feedback from non-committers.
Getting additional perspectives, interest, and enthusiasm from users is
critical for any project, doubly so for an integrating application where
committers cannot be experts in all the systems we are integrating with. I
believe
It is undefined at this point and I agree we should reach consensus
and document it.
I am in favor making non-committer reviews binding.
Why do we do RTC:
- To help bring along new committers/grow the community
- To help promote quality by having peer reviews
Enabling non-committer reviews to
All, I was having a discussion with Mike Hogue - a recent contributor - off
list, and he had some questions about the review process. And largely the
root of the question was, if a non-committer reviews a patch or PR (which
Mike has spent some time doing), is that considered a "review"? I didn't
+1
2017-07-06 14:09 GMT+02:00 Joe Skora :
> +1 Release this package as NiFi Board Report July 2017
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
>
> > I don't have any concerns, looks good!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Aldrin Piri
+1 Release this package as NiFi Board Report July 2017
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> I don't have any concerns, looks good!
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
>
> > Looks good. Thanks for compiling this, Joe.
>
I don't have any concerns, looks good!
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks for compiling this, Joe.
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > It's that time again to submit our board
Looks good. Thanks for compiling this, Joe.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Team,
>
> It's that time again to submit our board report for Apache NiFi.
> Please see below draft. If you have any suggestions/fixes, edits
> please advise.
>
> I'll submit the