Re: [DISCUSS] CI / Travis / Jenkins

Joe, Thanks for that! yes, you are correct. The builds occurred twice as the parallel build was broken. :-) Since we can now build and run tests in parallel with contrib-check (YEAY) the dual build is no longer necessary. THANK YOU for chasing this down. While travis is one of the drivers

Re: [DISCUSS] CI / Travis / Jenkins

Team, Ok so finally some really solid news to share on the Travis-CI front. First, huge thanks to Aldrin for getting this started and folks like Andre and Pierre who have tweaked it to make it more usable as well. After a long run of it helping us out as we all know it went poorly with every

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Jeff Storck

Congrats Jeff! On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Jeff wrote: > Thanks, all! It's great to be a part of this amazing community. > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:27 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > > > Congrats Jeff! Welcome aboard! > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at

Re: MiNiFi (Java) 0.3.0

Jeff, Yes, I think we are certainly overdue and it has been on my list of items to get discussion around a release going. Makes a lot of sense to me. I'll create a JIRA to get this in motion. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > I'm curious what the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Jeff Storck

Thanks, all! It's great to be a part of this amazing community. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:27 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > Congrats Jeff! Welcome aboard! > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tony Kurc wrote: > > NiFi community, > > On behalf of the Apache

MiNiFi (Java) 0.3.0

I'm curious what the community thinks about a Java MiNiFi 0.3.0 release. Looks like 18 tasks [1] have been closed in 0.3.0 and there are no open pull requests. Is there anything outstanding that is waiting to be addressed and should go into a 0.3.0? Thanks, Jeff [1]