gt;
> > > > > > > Congrats!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Matt Burgess <
> > > mattyb...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
Congrats Jeffrey!
On Dec 5, 2017 11:51 AM, "Joe Witt" wrote:
Congrats Jeff! You've done a lot of great and difficult work
including wading into the scary world of Kerberos!
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> NiFi community,
> On behalf
I've seen it get stuck only to unstick with another merge
On Fri, May 11, 2018, 8:50 AM Mike Thomsen wrote:
> I approved one of Matt's PRs and merged, but it seems to be taking
> unusually long for the sync to GitHub. Is something broken?
>
+1 binding to release this package as minifi-0.4.0
* Verified sigs/hashes
* Built and ran with typical test flows across builds ( to include
SiteToSite )
Looks good thanks!
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Ran through everything in
Congrats! Well deserved!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 8:41 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> Congrats Kevin, very well deserved, thanks for all your work on the NiFi
> projects!
>
> 2018-07-31 14:26 GMT+02:00 Tony Kurc :
>
> > NiFi Community,
> >
> > On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce
Congrats Jeremy! Well deserved for you as well!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 8:42 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> Congrats Jeremy! Well deserved, thanks for all the work on the (Mi)NiFi
> projects (and the OAuth part under review)!
>
> 2018-07-31 14:36 GMT+02:00 Tony Kurc :
>
> > All,
> >
> > On behalf of
+1 binding
Built and tested flow on osx and centos
Worked through release helper's guide
Validates Sig's and hashes.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 6:10 AM Pierre Villard
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - went through the release helper guide
> - full clean install on OS X
> -
+1 ( binding )
Ran through the helper guide, testing normal flows ( w and w/o secure comms
)
Thanks,
Marc
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:05 AM Koji Kawamura
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran through the release helper.
> No issue was found.
> Thanks for RM duties, Jeff!
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at
+1 binding
Did the usual release helper validation, tested with typical use cases
and test flows, with and without minifi in a secure env.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:09 AM Andrew Psaltis
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Verified README.md, NOTICE, checksum, keys, Documentation for Load
> Balancing
+1 -- binding
Validated sigs, checksums, built, and used within current integration
testing techniques in secure mode.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:16 AM Mark Payne wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated hashes, build with contrib-check. Started and ensured that
> registry is
> able to store and
The Apache NiFi team would like to announce the release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi
C++ 0.6.0.
MiNiFi—a subproject of Apache NiFi—is a complementary data collection
approach that supplements the core tenets of NiFi in dataflow management,
focusing on the collection of data at the source of its
Hi ,
I've submitted a PR to Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ that enables the project
to access and run NiFi processors. This requires that certain jars be
included to bootstrap that process long with a set of NARs from which we
will access the desired components. Effectively this means that a user can
+1 ( binding )
verified sigs and hashes.
Built and tested with centos and u18, performing simple flow verification
with minifi and registry.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:09 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> +1, binding
>
> signature good
> hashes looked good
> full build and tests looked good on macos
]
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/blob/master/extensions/jni/ExecuteJavaProcessor.cpp#L103
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Marc Parisi
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:44 PM Brett Tiplitz
wrote:
> I'm trying to make a call from C++ into the Apache Nifi Logger. I
g to NiFi.
> >
> > According to my experience preventing the merge of a breaking change is
> easier than fixing later, which would make me vote for #2, however this
> approach has a side effect, too: introducing a breaking change (that MiNiFi
> needs to adapt) becomes a huge p
anyone would like
to take those duties.
Best Regards,
Marc Parisi
Hello Apache NiFi community,
I am pleased to call this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi
C++ 0.6.0
The source tar.gz, including signatures, digests, and convenience binaries.
can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-minifi-cpp/0.6.0/
Hello Apache NiFi community,
Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in
validating/verifying the release so they can vote.
# Download latest KEYS file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS
# Import keys file:
gpg --import KEYS
# Pull down nifi-minifi-cpp-0.6.0
The E-mail I sent moments ago has an incorrect subject line. This release
helper guide is for the second release candidate ( RC2), not RC1. I
apologize for the error.
Thanks,
Marc
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:52 PM Marc Parisi wrote:
> Hello Apache NiFi community,
>
> Please find the a
Hello Apache NiFi community,
I am pleased to call this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi
C++ 0.6.0
The source tar.gz, including signatures, digests, and convenience binaries.
can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-minifi-cpp/0.6.0-rc2/
The Git tag is
Hello Apache NiFi community,
Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in
validating/verifying the release so they can vote.
# Download latest KEYS file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS
# Import keys file:
gpg --import KEYS
# Pull down nifi-minifi-cpp-0.6.0
Apache NiFi Community,
I am pleased to announce that the 0.6.0 release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
passes with
4 +1 (binding) votes
1 +1 (non-binding) votes
0 0 votes
0 -1 (binding) votes
0 -1 (non-binding) votes
Thanks to all who helped make this release possible.
Here is the PMC vote
József,
Thank you for your interest. You are now a contributor and should be able
to self assign. Please let me know if you have any issues. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:41 AM József Kett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to get contributor access to Apache Nifi and/or NiFi MiNiFi
> C++ on
Congrats!
On Thu, May 30, 2019, 2:58 PM Jeff wrote:
> Welcome to the PMC, Peter! Congrats!
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:45 PM Tony Kurc wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Peter!!
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:21 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> >
> > > NiFi Community,
> > >
> > > On behalf of the
Eric,
You could use LibMiNiFi as a library if that suits your purposes, but the
API is built in a way that lends itself to support an agent with its
various components ( repositories, threadpools, command and control, etc )
If you have small processes that are purpose built please take a look at
at it.
Thanks,
Marc Parisi
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-933
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-919
Congratulations!
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:23 AM Aldrin Piri wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Arpad
> has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache
> NiFi project.
> We greatly appreciate all of Arpad's hard work and generous
+1 Bryan,
Followed the release helper performing signature/hash verification,
build, and basic verification.
Thanks,
Marc
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:21 AM Matt Gilman wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Ran through release helper.
>
> Noticed one of the changes bumps the maven version to 3.1.1.
Hi Jeremy,
Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ python processors support virtual environments;
however, I don't think the library links, once the binary is built, will be
overridden through conda's environment activation ( only PATH is updated if
I recall correctly )
I could be off base on the problem
Hi Jeremy,
The env variable I sent can be set or appended prior to running minifi,
without the need to recompile.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 3:38 PM Jeremy Dyer wrote:
> So are you saying I need to build and link against my conda python binary?
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:47 AM Ma
+1 (binding). I built and tested according to the release helper guide.
Demo app, hashes, readmes, and notices all look good.
Thanks Scott!
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:09 AM Matt Gilman
wrote:
> +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-fds-0.2.0
>
> Ran through release helper. Checked out demo
t; > > >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:37 PM Arpad Boda
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Happy to take RM roles as well.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:30 AM Arpad Boda <
> a
Congrats!
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 11:51 PM Sivaprasanna
wrote:
> Congratulations, Daniel. All the very best.
>
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 6:01 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Dániel!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 8:21 PM Otto Fowler
> wrote:
> >
> > > std::cout << “Congratulations” <<
+1
Verified sigs/hashes, built and ran example flows on my server
machine(s) running the same flow across different operating systems. Used
Apache NIFi MiNiFi as an ingress to NiFi for common test flow that I use.
Awesome work getting this out!
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:56 PM Robert
Congrats Rob!
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:59 AM Rob Moran wrote:
> Thanks for all your work, Rob -- congrats!
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:29 AM Andrew Lim
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Rob!
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 24, 2019, at 7:56 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> > >
> > > Apache NiFi community,
> > > On
+1 binding
Verified sigs, hashes, etc per the typical release helper process.
Since the list of resolved issues were so small I verified most, with the
exception of 7051, 7080, and 7069. All others appear to be resolved.
Only built on PopOS and Centos due to superbowl -- but everything
+1 binding. Validated release and tested some of the conditions experienced
with open files ( with reporting tasks ) and did not encounter any issues.
Awesome work.
Marc
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:10 AM Chad Zobrisky wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
> Ran through verify release checklist and
ran this over the weekend but forgot to respond.
I saw the other chain, which reminded me to respond. Sorry about that...
Ran my typical release build following the helper guide. Used my typical
test flow.
+1 if we can extend the vote, otherwise I'll jump on RC2.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at
Mike my osx builds are also Catalina based. I usually add -T2C but don't
recall if I added that to the release vote build. The output was
successful, though.
If it only sporadically occurs I can retry a few more times or run in a
loop tomorrow.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 7:10 PM Joe Witt wrote:
>
+1 (binding)
Ran through helper guide for validation.
Built on pop os and osx.
Ran a high throughout test flow, where I encountered no regressions across
several record oriented processors and non secure site to site.
Thanks,
Marc
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, 4:43 PM Andrew Lim wrote:
> +1
+1 Binding to release
Followed the release helper guide -- didn't see any license issues, all
looks good.
I built and ran with some custom NARs on a sizable Apache NiFi Cluster
running a high throughput workload that I used to validate 1.10 -- no
issues encountered or performance
May 4, 2020 at 11:38 AM Marc Parisi wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> When merging I did not use the NiFi processors to test as I already have
> tooling around H20 driven ML in my home. While I don't admittedly use it
> very often, I thought the python processors were quite cool and could
&
are the JIRAs still open if this is merged? Can you please
> close them and assign to the proper fix version if these are 'done'?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:46 AM Marc Parisi wrote:
>
> > "We should find a way for vendors to offer extension points like this
Hi Joe,
When merging I did not use the NiFi processors to test as I already have
tooling around H20 driven ML in my home. While I don't admittedly use it
very often, I thought the python processors were quite cool and could
certainly be useful for others. My rationale is that the dependencies are
AWS, Azure, GCP, etc..
> > >
> > > So in the case of minificpp we are certain there is no L concern
> > > regarding either our source OR convenience binary?
> > >
> > > Lastly, why are the JIRAs still open if this is merged? Can you please
07ddc69#diff-fa43d8bfc508fc5db1c2a320e3d03cb5R33
>
> Does that seem fine to you?
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:29 PM Marc Parisi wrote:
>
> > Hey Joe,
> >
> > "Yeah for the three/commit James replied on in that link - i dont see how
> > we
> > can keep those. They import from so
+1 binding
* Ran through release helper guide.
* Ran build and tested in clustered mode.
*Tested site to site with minifi java without any issues or perceived
leakage.
Thanks,
Marc
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:21 AM Andrew Lim
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -Ran full clean install on OS X
+1 (binding )
Ran through helper guide with clean build env . Ran flows that ingest and
query Apache hbase and accumulo from a 10 VM secured cluster in my local
environment with jdk11.
Thanks,
Marc
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 7:11 AM Kotaro Terada wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signatures
Congrats Drew!
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:14 PM Andrew Lim
wrote:
> Thanks everyone! Excited about NiFi's future with you all!
>
> -Drew
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:24 PM Mike Thomsen
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:56 PM Peter Turcsanyi
> > wrote:
> >
> >
Congrats Arpad!
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:25 PM Mike Thomsen wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:55 PM Peter Turcsanyi
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Arpad!
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:46 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats and thank you!
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020
+1 to 0.8.0. Been keeping up with changes and I think the progress is
great.
In my opinion the breaking changes are long coming and probably would be
appreciated by the community.
Arpad are you thinking of going to 1.x? You're discussing 0.8, but is there
any reason to not jump to 1.x after
+1 binding
Verified sigs and hashes
Built and run on Linux LXC (Java 11) w/ Secured Apache NiFi built and run
in the same container. All looked good
Perused L and it looked good.
Thanks,
Marc
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:48 PM Peter Turcsanyi
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - verified signatures
Marton,
Sorry for the late reply, I gave you perms to add and update the spaces.
Please let me know if you have any issues.
Thanks,
Marc
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:27 AM Marton Szasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask for write access to the MiNiFi space on Confluence to
> create release
+1
Verified sigs and hashes
Built on PopOS ( based-off of U20.04 ). I haven't tried this release on my
ARM platforms, but will try as soon as I can.
Ran basic flow pulling log data (TailFile) and sending to an Apache NiFi
node via SiteToSite.
I think the work done in 0.9.0 has been great and
+1
- Verified sigs and hashes
- Built on PopOS w/ java 8 && 11
- Tested with basic flow sending data to various devices w/ Secured
transport
- Tested secured w/ secured nifi reg.
Thanks,
Marc
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:56 PM Andrew Lim
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Tested secure NiFi with secure
Hi Matt,
I think this is great. I like the MVP set of features.
Considering use cases and potential maintenance needs, are there thoughts
on including RESTART in the MVP for cases where agent UPDATES may be
blocked for whatever reason ( I/O, agent problems, etc )?
Does the risk of the RESTART
as any others the community
> would like to offer) should be discussed too. If these are not
> necessary for MVP, perhaps we can get the work going on the API and
> MVP and continue the discussions on the Wiki and/or mailing list as
> folks want to contribute the extra goodies :)
>
> Thank
+1 verified sigs and hashes and ran some test flows from a local cluster
gathering log data sending to nifi via site to site.
Works great!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 6:51 AM Ádám Markovics wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Verified and built on Ubuntu 20.04. Ran tests and also ran a simple
>
Thanks Marton. Sorry about that Adam!
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:40 AM Marton Szasz wrote:
> For the record, there were actually 5 +1 (binding) votes and 5 +1
> (non-binding) votes.
>
> I'm assuming the miscategorized vote was from Marc, who didn't specify
> the kind of vote in the email, but he
Really awesome work from a great team so I think a release is in order as
well. +1
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:48 AM Gábor Gyimesi wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 11:30, Pierre Villard
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Le mar. 17 mai 2022 à 10:02, Ádám Markovics a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
+1
verified sigs and hashes.
Ran a simple flow, starting, stopping, and changing flow with c2 protocol.
Everything looks good. Great stuff!
Thanks,
Marc
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:56 AM Martin Zink wrote:
> Good idea, I've renamed the convenience binary
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 2:54 PM
+1 (binding)
Simple test capturing WEL sending to NiFi. Verified build on u22 as well,
verifying sigs and hashes.
Thanks,
Marc
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:56 PM Marton Szasz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Followed the release helper guide steps, everything was in good order.
> - Tested build on
+1 binding.
Typical build I do with docker builds on a U22 base. Followed release
guide, confirmed sigs and hashes, and ran my prototypical flows which
include NiFi WEC -> MiNiFi -> Kafka . Didn't notice any issues with Readme
+ NOTICE or LICENSE files
Great work team!
Thanks,
Marc
On Thu, Dec
63 matches
Mail list logo