Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/490
It remains an issue I have not been able to solve at this point: the case
where the new file contains more data than the tailed file before being moved.
In this case we ends up in the same
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/490
NIFI-1959 Added length and timestamp to detect rollover
It improves robustness of the processor in case the property âRolling
filename patternâ is not set and the tailed file is moved for some
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r65755477
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/ParseEvtx.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,352
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492
I am running out of time right now, but will have a deeper look later and
give it a try asap. As a general comment, I'd say, even if I know how boring it
can be, that some comments in the code
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257
@trixpan @olegz @michalklempa
I rebased the PR against master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
@olegz
Just to be sure before merging in: do you plan to add a unit test?
My guess is that it is not possible to simulate this server-side behavior,
but I want to confirm.
---
If your
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/486
+1 @mattyb149
merged in master and 0.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493
I have played with it and it works great.
One remark: I am wondering if the 'HDFS_PATH_TO_WATCH' property should be
improved:
- accept the expression language to handle time-stamped
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65879551
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/EventAttributes.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878804
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878170
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878313
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
Agree. Merging...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65967740
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493
@jjmeyer0 Yes you're absolutely right, I was not suggesting to have the
three options together but rather think about what could be done to give more
flexibility. I think there is a processor
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502
Thanks @mans2singh ! I'll have a look asap (probably on Sunday or next
week). Regarding the provenance event, I think we could have a SEND event for
each flow file successfully sent to Ignite
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66513208
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/PutIgniteCache.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66515866
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/AbstractIgniteProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66516313
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/resources/ignite-client.xml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+
+
+http
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66513705
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/PutIgniteCache.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66514855
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/PutIgniteCache.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66514230
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/AbstractIgniteCacheProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66513495
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/PutIgniteCache.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66510540
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/AbstractIgniteProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502
@mans2singh Could you check all the lines marked as removed? I believe
there should not be any and this is probably because of some settings in your
IDE.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502#discussion_r66512938
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ignite-bundle/nifi-ignite-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ignite/cache/PutIgniteCache.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/527
LGTM +1. Do you mind fixing the import auto-ordering?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/527
@olegz It seems it is in conflict with 0.x branch, could you check if I am
wrong and if not submit a PR for 0.x?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493
Your changes look good to me. Let me know if you want to have a look to
enable EL/RegEx on HDFS_PATH_TO_WATCH property (ReplaceText processor seems to
accept both regex and expression language
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/521
reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/521
LGTM +1. Merged both in 0.x and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/481
Good catch. Will merge.
However not sure why the travis build failed...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/466
LGTM +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502
@mans2singh
Just had a new look and ran a workflow to test the processor. Few remarks
even though I am not familiar with Ignite... First, I am not sure to see how I
can check the content
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257
@olegz half-time ;) done!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67423663
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -793,13 +798,21 @@ private void validateState(final FlowFile flowFile
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67424962
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/util/TestMockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -55,4 +55,35 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext ctx
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493
@jjmeyer0 LGTM +1 tested with workflows, mvn build OK.
Merged in master, but would you mind opening a specific PR for 0.x branch
(Java 7 compatible):
GetHDFSEvents.java:[208,78] error: local
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67428396
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-scripting-bundle/nifi-scripting-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/script/InvokeScriptedProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/551
Merged in master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/552
NIFI-2066 dynamic port allocation in SNMP processors unit tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi NIFI-2066
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/496#discussion_r67825492
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-enrich-bundle/nifi-enrich-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/AbstractEnrichProcessor.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/379#discussion_r67956841
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-alluxio-bundle/nifi-alluxio-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/alluxio/AbstractAlluxioProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/379
Thanks for the review @apiri!
I still need to take into account some of your comments but I rebased the
PR against master. While doing some additional testing, for a reason I can't
explain yet
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534
thanks @PuspenduBanerjee, I'm quite busy this WE, will have another look
asap
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/398
Hey @apiri,
Many thanks for the review!
Regarding HTTPS, at the time I submitted the PR I was testing it with
CCProxy (on Windows computer). I can't test it again with this setup
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/545
Thanks @olegz! I just merged it into 0.x, could you close the PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/547
NIFI-2060 - fixed unit tests to be compatible with 2.7.x
Itâs a shame to limit what is tested here (in terms of event types) but
it seems to be the only way to have both 2.6 and 2.7 lines
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/398
Yep, not sure it's worth it. I think it is fine to let the PR as is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272
It should be OK, let me know if not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67390898
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/util/TestMockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
*/
package org.apache.nifi.util
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67391289
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/util/TestMockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ public void testPenalizeFlowFileFromProcessor
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67392290
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/util/TestMockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -55,4 +55,35 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext ctx
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r67390513
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -587,13 +589,15 @@ public void transfer(final FlowFile flowFile, final
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/534#discussion_r68430574
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-scripting-bundle/nifi-scripting-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/script/InvokeScriptedProcessor.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/536
Thanks @JPercivall! I didn't realize that...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/502
Hi @mans2singh, I didn't find time to give it a new try, but I hope I will
this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pvillard31 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/401
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/536
@jjmeyer0 Thanks! I just merged it in 0.x branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/226
NIFI-1063
NIFI-1063 Logging exception in PutHDFS
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi NIFI-1063
Alternatively you
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/228
NIFI-1282
Fixed error message when attempting to start a disabled port
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi NIFI
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/229
NIFI-1252
Allows empty private key passphrase by removing the validator on the
property.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232
NIFI-1521 Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor
Allows use of SSL in AMQP Processor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185270244
Well I must admit I locally tested the change with a RabbitMQ server,
but that's all. I had a look at the existing unit tests for AMQP processors but
I am not sure
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#discussion_r53195449
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-amqp-bundle/nifi-amqp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/amqp/processors/AbstractAMQPProcessor.java
---
@@ -84,6
Github user pvillard31 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185598549
Should I consider a modification on the SSL context to let the user choose
the client authentication policy?
From what I see in the InvokeHTTP, this is NONE
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-185642080
I added the use of SSL context and modified the pom file of
nifi-amqp-processors to have:
```xml
org.apache.nifi
nifi
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-194834756
I just re-based the PR. Let me know if something else is needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272#issuecomment-196200486
Definitely agree with you that this API should not act this way.
Anyway, just to clarify, this is only in the case there is no body/content
sent
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272#issuecomment-195793923
Due to JIRA unavailability, I think the PR has not been linked to issue in
JIRA. Just adding a comment to mention the PR in JIRA.
---
If your project is set up
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272#issuecomment-196309847
@joewitt yes I can have a look this afternoon. I'll try to propose
something before the end of the day.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/347
NIFI-1755 Fixed remote process group status counts by only considering
connected remote ports
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/324#issuecomment-208369542
@olegz Tests on master are OK but not when testing this PR.
Windows 10 / Maven 3.3.9 : Java 1.0.8_74
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/348
NIFI-1724 Added properties to configure log level when file not found and
permission denied on FetchFile processor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/337
NIFI-1732 Added timeout property to override 30s default when handling HTTP
requests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/337#issuecomment-207403440
@markap14 Thanks for the comments, I updated the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/292#issuecomment-199134795
Everything OK, I'm a :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272#issuecomment-199144952
I updated the PR with a true/false "send body" property, should be in line
with last comments. Let me know if not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/272#issuecomment-199714780
@taftster Thanks Adam. I updated the PR regarding your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/297#issuecomment-199874747
I'm a +1, all tests previously in failure are now OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/297#issuecomment-199871907
Testing on Windows 7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/304#discussion_r57464551
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestPutSQL.java
---
@@ -144,6
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/291#issuecomment-198968796
Tried a mvn clean install without success on my side (I missed something?):
[mvn_output.txt](https://github.com/apache/nifi/files/181411/mvn_output.txt
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/291#issuecomment-198987604
@trkurc I am currently checking on my side why the other unit tests are in
failure. But as you said, this is not related to this PR, so it is OK for me.
---
If your
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/291#issuecomment-198970178
Windows 7 Pro / Maven 3.3.9 / Java 1.8.0_74
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/291#issuecomment-198982574
Sorry for the delay... I am on a different computer than usual and forgot
to check the git property. Did a full clone again (so slow with airport
wifi...) and checked
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/291#issuecomment-198994990
Just for the record, the error is because of my local env. This is fixed by
setting the locale to US on the scanner:
`scanner.useLocale(java.util.Locale.US
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257#issuecomment-200748951
@olegz I just rebased the PR.
As @michalklempa mentioned, you can use online SNMP service provided by
snmpsim (http://snmpsim.sourceforge.net/public-snmp
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257#discussion_r55185061
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-snmp-bundle/nifi-snmp-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/snmp/processors/SNMPUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,268
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257
NIFI-1537 Added SNMP processors
Processors for SNMP set/get/walk operations over SNMP v1, v2c & v3 using
SNMP4J library.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by run
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257#issuecomment-193298687
Oleg, yes sure, will do!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/259
NIFI-1332 Fixed HTTP-204 handling + unit test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi NIFI-1332
Alternatively you can
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/257#issuecomment-193330177
Pre-requisite: NIFI-1595 has to be merged in before
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/304#issuecomment-202778901
Tested and contrib-checked.
Before:
Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestPutSQL
Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/232#issuecomment-205493328
@olegz Following comments on JIRA, I reverted modifications on SSL Context
service and added a Client Auth property (as it has been done in Cassandra
processors). I
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/366#issuecomment-213925464
@olegz @joewitt I updated my last comment to reflect the discussion I had
with Oleg regarding the task counter: there is no issue, it was my mistake
during debug
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/389#discussion_r61540826
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/HandleHttpResponse.java
Github user pvillard31 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/366#issuecomment-213764931
I think there is an issue on Consumer side. Here is my test case:
GenerateFlowFile -> ReplaceText -> PublishKafka
ConsuleKafka -> UpdateAttribute -
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/366#discussion_r60829110
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kafka-bundle/nifi-kafka-pubsub-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kafka/pubsub
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
