All,
Given the issues I am canceling this vote. Once the three issues outlined by
Joe, tickets copied below, are resolved I will generate a new RC. Please look
for an updated vote RC and helper soon.
Thank you for your efforts and I apologize for not finding these issues prior
to initiating
After some discussion it is likely that the functional issue is a result of a
specific configuration combined with this PR [1] for NIFI-1981 [2]. I don’t
have access to Joe’s system to debug that specific issue, but I vote -1 until
we know what is going on.
[1]
This feels like a newbie question, but the release tag "nifi-0.7.0-RC1"
points to commit c9d9485, one commit ahead of the stated release commit
56dc8ae. Is that expected as part of generating the RC?
Thanks,
James
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Joe Percivall <
Requesting a courtesy extra day please :-)
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Timing these is not easy. But requesting a courtesy weekend extra day is
> totally reasonable and has been done in the past.
> On Jun 25, 2016 8:09 AM, "Ryan H"
In that case, I'd like to request the vote be extended to Tuesday
afternoon. There is at least one critical bug fix that just got in that we
haven't been able to test. We've only been able to reliably replicate the
problem on one system, and I do not have access to it over the weekend. It
is not
Timing these is not easy. But requesting a courtesy weekend extra day is
totally reasonable and has been done in the past.
On Jun 25, 2016 8:09 AM, "Ryan H" wrote:
> I'd love to get the opportunity to test the nifi-0.7.0-RC1 tag on my
> integration server at work..
Not quite ready to vote but here is the status of my review.
Checked out the build/commit/hashes/etc.. and all those things checked out.
Extraneous file:
- It has /appveyor.yml file. Obviously this is not a big deal but
should be ignored from source release somehow.
Recommendation: File a JIRA
Hi,
+1
Thanks Joe for the amazing work to have this RC out.
Ran through the helper release guide.
Signature and checksums are OK.
Maven build with tests and contrib-check OK on Windows 10.
Tested some flows and everything looks OK.
-Pierre
2016-06-24 21:34 GMT+02:00 Joe Percivall