Re: Request for enhancement

[Gunjan Dave]

Hi Joe, I dont seem to have access to nifi jira to create one. Can it be
given? Or if not, could someone help raising it.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, 7:49 AM Joe Percivall  wrote:

> - Moving users list to BCC
>
> Hello Gunjan,
>
> This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the
> suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be
> discussed and worked on there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
>
>
> Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
>
> Joe
> - - - - - -
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <
> gunjanpiyushd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like below didnot get delivered.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> > I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> > be incorporated in the provenance graph.
> >
> > Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> > can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> > would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually
> intuitive.
> >
> > just a suggestion, not mandatory.
> >
>

Re: Request for enhancement

[Joe Percivall]

- Moving users list to BCC

Hello Gunjan,

This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the 
suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be discussed 
and worked on there.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI


Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!

Joe 
- - - - - - 
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com



On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave  
wrote:



Seems like below didnot get delivered.


On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave 
wrote:

> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>