Re: parallelizing mkdep?

2020-09-27 Thread Xiang Xiao
Matias, please make a patch, let's improve it step by step. On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:48 PM Matias N. wrote: > > With the code I shown here it would be still an all or nothing generation of > Make.dep > as I remove all .d files. I didn't want to change that to avoid breaking > anything. > Do

Re: parallelizing mkdep?

2020-09-27 Thread Matias N.
With the code I shown here it would be still an all or nothing generation of Make.dep as I remove all .d files. I didn't want to change that to avoid breaking anything. Do you intend to create a PR in this regard? Otherwise I can create one with this code Best, Matias On Sun, Sep 27, 2020, at

Re: parallelizing mkdep?

2020-09-27 Thread Xiang Xiao
Yes, this is what we are considering to change. It desn't only improve the parallelization, but also avoids generating the full library(e.g. libc) dependency if the user just changes one source file. On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:55 AM Matias N. wrote: > > Hi, > as a test I changed the depend

RE: Stack size alignment on arm

2020-09-27 Thread Schock, Johannes - NIVUS GmbH
> So in px4, I end up seeing stack usage 100% on some threads (in "ps"), which > I want to fix. PR #1900 (https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1900) fixes the issue. > In the past (9 or so years ago) there was an issue with floating point that > required the stack to be 8 byte